복잡계 과학을 통한 이슈리더십이론의 해석

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Traditional views of leadership are based on an assumption of certainty. However, the complex systems science has challenged the certainty approach by arguing that uncertainty is a better starting point.
In this paper, we have interpreted the issue leadership theory(Baik, 2002) from the view of the complex systems science. Baik(2002) defines issue leadership as a process in which a person guides audience by creating issues, involving the audience, and implementing the issue. Also, he argues that the issue leader emerges from the result of social interaction.
In the view of complex systems science, the source of emergent leaders is self-organizing process; adaptive tension, collective intelligence, learning & adaptation. The issue leadership process also is similar to self-organizing process conceptually.
After a detailed interpretation of the issue leadership using complex systems science, we researched, and tried to answer the question. How do we apply the issue leadership theory to uncertainty of complex systems?

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 백기복, "이슈리더십의 3P 증진방안" 국민대학교 (10) : 353-366, 2006

2 백기복, "이슈리더십 측정도구 개발과 타당성 분석" 국민대학교 (8) : 335-351, 2004

3 백기복, "이슈리더십 스타일과 심리적 변수들 간의 관계" 국민대학교 (6) : 377-392, 2000

4 백기복, "리더십2001: 이슈리더십의 조절효과 검증" 국민대학교 (8) : 335-351, 2002

5 백기복, "리더십 ’97 :이슈 중심의 리더십 행동" 국민대학교 (4) : 309-329, 1998

6 Slywotzky, A., "Value migration" Harvard Business School Press 1996

7 Podsakoff, P. M., "Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers’ trust in leader, satisfaction, & organizational citizenship behaviors" 1 : 107-142, 1990

8 Chan, K. Y., "Toward a theory of individual differences and leadership: Understanding the motivation to lead" 86 (86): 481-498, 2001

9 Stacey, R. D., "The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change process" 16 : 477-495, 1995

10 Plowman, D. A., "The role of leadership in emergent, self-organization" 18 : 341-356, 2007

11 Kauffman, S. A., "The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution" Oxford University Press 1993

12 Drath, W., "The deep blue sea: Rethinking the source of leadership" Jossey-Bass & Center for Creative Leadership 2001

13 Burt, R. S., "The contingent value of social capital" 42 : 339-365, 1997

14 Mead, G. H., "The Philosophy of the Act" University of Chicago Press 1938

15 Burt, R. S., "Structural holes: The social structure of competition" Harvard University Press 1992

16 Stacey, R., "Strategy as order emerging from chaos" 26 (26): 10-17, 1993

17 Wheatley, M., "Self-organized networks" 25 (25): 7-8, 2008

18 Cowan, M., "Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity XIX" Addison-Wesley 1994

19 Plowman, D. A., "Radical change accidentally: The emergence and amplification of small change" 50 (50): 513-541, 2007

20 McKelvey, B., "Quasi-natural organization science" 8 : 351-380, 1997

21 Argote, L., "Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, & transferring knowledge" Kluwer 1999

22 Chiles, T., "Organizational emergence: The origin &transformation of Branson, Missouri’s musical theaters" 15 (15): 499-519, 2004

23 Prigogine, I., "Non-linear science and the laws of nature" 334 (334): 745-758, 1997

24 Guastello, S. J., "Non-linear dynamics & leadership emergence" 18 : 357-369, 2007

25 Lichtenstein, B. B., "Moving far-from-equilibrium: Opportunity tension as the driver of emergence" 2007

26 McKelvey, B., "Mobilizing the Self-Renewing Organization" Sage 2000

27 Crable, R., "Managing issues & influencing public" 11 (11): 3-15, 1985

28 Stacey, R. D., "Managing chaos" Kogan Page Publishers Ltd. 1992

29 Orton, J. D., "Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization" 15 (15): 203-223, 1990

30 Marion, R., "Leadership in complex organizations" 12 : 389-418, 2001

31 Day, D. V., "Leadership development: A review in context" 11 (11): 581-613, 2000

32 Wheatley, M., "Leadership and the New Science: Learning about Organization from an Orderly Universe" Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc 1994

33 Triandis, H. C., "Individualism and Collectivism" Westview Press 1995

34 Eden, D., "Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior scales" 60 : 736-741, 1975

35 Bak, P., "How nature works: The science of self-organized critically" Copernicus 1996

36 Holland, J. H., "Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity" Addison-Wesley 1995

37 Barney, J. B., "Firm resources & sustained competitive advantage" 17 : 99-120, 1991

38 Nicolis, G., "Exploring complexity" Freeman 1989

39 Shane, S., "Cultural differences in innovation championing strategies" 21 (21): 931-952, 1995

40 Anderson, P., "Complexity theory & organization science" 10 (10): 216-232, 1999

41 Uhl-Bien, M., "Complexity leadership Theory;Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era" 18 : 298-318, 2007

42 Marion, R., "Complexity in organizations: A paradigm shift" 206 : 247-269, 2006

43 Plowman, D. A., "Complexity Leadership, Part I: Conceptual Foundations" IAP 2008

44 Goldstein, J., "Complex Systems Leadership Theory" ISCE 2007

45 McKelvey, B, "Complex Systems Leadership Theory" 2007

46 Porter, M. E., "Competitive advantage" 74 : 61-78, 1996

47 Hamel, G., "Competing for the future" Harvard Business School Press 1994

48 Thietart, R. A., "Chaos theory & organizations" 6 : 19-31, 1995

49 Kauffman, S. A., "At home in the universe: the search for the laws of self-organization and complexity" Oxford University Press 1995

50 Masuch, M., "Artificial intelligence in organization and management theory" Elsevier Science 1992

51 Holland, H. H., "Artificial adaptive agents in economic theory" 81 : 365-370, 1991

52 백기복, "Anatomy of Issue Leaders' Behaviors" 한국인사관리학회 26 (26): 313-341, 2002

53 Hanges, P. J., "An information-processing perspective on leadership and culture: A case for connectionist architecture" 49 : 133-161, 2000

54 Levinthal, D. A., "Adaptation on rugged landscapes" 43 : 934-950, 1997