수사 초기단계에서 효과적인 진술의 확보방안에 관한 연구 -미국법과 비교법적 관점에서- = A Study on the security-Device of the effective statement in the early-Investigation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Until now well-organized man-power and tactics have been employed to cope with more serious kinds of crime such as corruption, violence and drugs. But from now on, facing new crime, it is necessary to build up investigation-device in a new shape to meet the goals which are suggested by the people. So to speak, it is time that a device on the security of the statement in the early-Investigation must be discussed to exercise the social justice. Because major crimes, such as corruption, financial fraud, organized violence, have no any evidence without the statement in the early-Investigation. If the testimony of a person is material in a criminal proceeding, and if it is shown that it may become impracticable to secure the presence of the person without the warrant, I think that a judicial officer must order the arrest of the person and treat the person in accordance with the provisions of criminal procedure. Of course, if the testimony of such witness can adequately be secured voluntarily, and if any detention is not necessary to prevent a failure of justice, a device on the security of the statement by the Witness won`t be adequate for the crimes committed. In this context, Investigator have to develop a strong sense of responsibility for the realization of nation-wide wishes for clean society. Especially, it is necessary to make effort toward the specialization of manpower and pratice such as seeking information from informants, checking departmental records and computor files including Plea Bargaining in newer types of crime such as hightech crime and more sophisticated crime. I think that the law must be enforced to be more efficiently and consistently through proactive procedures and reactive procedures.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 윤동호, "형사절차와 협상" 한국형사정책연구원 2003

2 하태훈, "형사소송절차상의 협상제도" 한국비교형사법학회 6 (6): 211-238, 2004

3 류전철, "형사소송에서 유죄협상제도(Plea Bargaining)의 도입가능성" 한국비교형사법학회 7 (7): 203-226, 2005

4 조동석, "허위진술죄의 도입제안" 2001

5 조상준, "허위진술죄 Ⅱ－허위진술에 의한 형사사법 부실에 대한 대책－참고인 진술확보 방안 연구 in: 미래기획단 연구총서 Ⅲ" 검찰미래기획단

6 조상준, "참고인 구인제도-참고인진술 확보 방안 연구 in: 미래기획단 연구총서Ⅲ" 검찰미래기획단

7 하홍식, "유죄협상에 관한 연구" 법무연수원 12 : 1995

8 정상환, "사법방해와 허위진술" 법무연수원 13 : 1997

9 박용철, "미국의 유죄 협상제(Plea Bargaining)에 대한 제고" 한국비교형사법학회 7 (7): 439-470, 2005

10 박미숙, "미국의 사법방해죄에 관한 연구" 한국형사정책연구원 1999

11 정석우, "미국의 검찰 벌칙부 소환영장제도" 법무연수원 15 : 1999

12 이영상, "면책조건부 증언취득제도 도입 시론" 대검찰청 (4) : 2006

13 금태섭, "Plea Bargaining 제도와 그 도입문제-Plea Bargaining 제도에 관한연구"

14 Stephen J. Schulhofer, "Plea Bargaining as Disaster" 101 : 1979

15 Robert E. Scott, "Plea Bargaining as Contract" 101 : 1909-, 1992

16 Rebecca Milne, "Investigative Interviewing: Psychology and Practice" John Wiley & Sons Inc 1999

17 서창희, "Grand Jury 및 Immunity를 이용한 수사" 법무연수원 11 : 1995

18 Roger C. Park, "EVIDENCE LAW(2nd ed. 2004)" 2004

19 LaFave, Wayne R, "Criminal Procedure(4th ed. 2004)" 2004