RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    발전사업 인허가 이양 확대에 대한 공무원 의견 조사

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=E1685090

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    1. 추진 배경
    ¡ 발전사업 인허가권 이양 추진 관련 허가권자인 지자체 및 피허가권자인 업계의 의
    견 수렴을 통해 필요성 및 적정 이양 범위 등 검토
    2. 설문조사 대상 및 응답률
    ¡ (조사대상) 발전사업 허가권을 가진 174개 지자체 및 태양광, 풍력 발전 관련 34개
    기업
    ¡ (응답률) 조사대상의 72%인 125개 지자체 및 53%인 18개 기업이 설문에 응답
    3. 설문조사 주요 결과
    ¡ (이양권 확대) 지자체는 반대 의견이 다수인 반면 업계는 중도적
    ? 지자체의 80.7%가 반대(광역 10/13, 기초 86/106, 업계는 55.6%가 찬성)
    ¡ (이양 범위_지자체) 태양광 및 풍력 모두 5MW 이하나 현행 유지를 선호
    ¡ (이양범위_업체) 태양광은 현행 유지, 풍력은 20MW 이하를 선호
    ¡ (인력현황) 지자체는 68.1%가 인력이 충분하지 못하다는 반면, 충분하단 의견은
    10.1%에 그침
    ¡ (역량 및 전문성) 지자체는 44.2%가 발전사업허가 인력의 전문성이 부족하다고 판
    단하였으며, 충분하다는 의견은 19.2%에 그침
    ¡ (이양과 보급과의 관계) 지자체는 이양 확대와 신재생 보급 확대의 관련성이 없다
    는 반면, 업계는 과반이 긍정적이라 답변함
    ¡ (AHP 분석) 발전사업허가와 관련한 16개 항목 중에서 지자체는 ‘이양범위유지’ 항
    목의 중요도가 가장 높게 부여함
    ¡ (전문가 의견) 인허가권한 이양 확대를 위해서는 사전 준비 및 체계 수립이 선행
    되어야 한다고 지적하였으며, 現체제의 유지 또는 인허가 전담 기관 등 다른 대
    안을 제안함
    ¡ (종합의견) 지자체는 인력 및 전문성 부족, 업무 과중 및 시스템 미비 등을 이유로
    반대 의견이 지배적이며, 신재생에너지 발전 비중 확대에 대해서도 회의적임
    4. 정책 제언
    ¡ 발전사업 허가 업무를 산업부, 광역지자체, 기초지자체로 명확하게 구분하는 법
    규정의 명문화 필요함
    ¡ 산업부는 5MW 초과, 광역지자체는 1MW초과-5MW 이하, 기초지자체는 1MW 이
    하 사업에 대한 발전사업 인허가 업무를 담당하는 것을 제언함
    ¡ 지자체로의 원활한 이양 확대를 위해서 담당 인력의 확충과 담당자의 교육 및 역
    량 개발이 가장 중요함
    ¡ 따라서, 발전사업허가 업무를 전담하는 담당자를 배치하고, 과거 발전사업허가 신
    청 건 수를 바탕으로 적정 인원에 대한 가이드라인을 제시
    ¡ 발전사업 허가 업무와 관련한 검토 기준이나 매뉴얼 또는 세부 기준을 산업부 차
    원에서 명확하게 제시하여 업무 담당자의 혼선 또는 부담을 경감해야 함
    번역하기

    1. 추진 배경 ¡ 발전사업 인허가권 이양 추진 관련 허가권자인 지자체 및 피허가권자인 업계의 의 견 수렴을 통해 필요성 및 적정 이양 범위 등 검토 2. 설문조사 대상 및 응답률 ¡ (조사�...

    1. 추진 배경
    ¡ 발전사업 인허가권 이양 추진 관련 허가권자인 지자체 및 피허가권자인 업계의 의
    견 수렴을 통해 필요성 및 적정 이양 범위 등 검토
    2. 설문조사 대상 및 응답률
    ¡ (조사대상) 발전사업 허가권을 가진 174개 지자체 및 태양광, 풍력 발전 관련 34개
    기업
    ¡ (응답률) 조사대상의 72%인 125개 지자체 및 53%인 18개 기업이 설문에 응답
    3. 설문조사 주요 결과
    ¡ (이양권 확대) 지자체는 반대 의견이 다수인 반면 업계는 중도적
    ? 지자체의 80.7%가 반대(광역 10/13, 기초 86/106, 업계는 55.6%가 찬성)
    ¡ (이양 범위_지자체) 태양광 및 풍력 모두 5MW 이하나 현행 유지를 선호
    ¡ (이양범위_업체) 태양광은 현행 유지, 풍력은 20MW 이하를 선호
    ¡ (인력현황) 지자체는 68.1%가 인력이 충분하지 못하다는 반면, 충분하단 의견은
    10.1%에 그침
    ¡ (역량 및 전문성) 지자체는 44.2%가 발전사업허가 인력의 전문성이 부족하다고 판
    단하였으며, 충분하다는 의견은 19.2%에 그침
    ¡ (이양과 보급과의 관계) 지자체는 이양 확대와 신재생 보급 확대의 관련성이 없다
    는 반면, 업계는 과반이 긍정적이라 답변함
    ¡ (AHP 분석) 발전사업허가와 관련한 16개 항목 중에서 지자체는 ‘이양범위유지’ 항
    목의 중요도가 가장 높게 부여함
    ¡ (전문가 의견) 인허가권한 이양 확대를 위해서는 사전 준비 및 체계 수립이 선행
    되어야 한다고 지적하였으며, 現체제의 유지 또는 인허가 전담 기관 등 다른 대
    안을 제안함
    ¡ (종합의견) 지자체는 인력 및 전문성 부족, 업무 과중 및 시스템 미비 등을 이유로
    반대 의견이 지배적이며, 신재생에너지 발전 비중 확대에 대해서도 회의적임
    4. 정책 제언
    ¡ 발전사업 허가 업무를 산업부, 광역지자체, 기초지자체로 명확하게 구분하는 법
    규정의 명문화 필요함
    ¡ 산업부는 5MW 초과, 광역지자체는 1MW초과-5MW 이하, 기초지자체는 1MW 이
    하 사업에 대한 발전사업 인허가 업무를 담당하는 것을 제언함
    ¡ 지자체로의 원활한 이양 확대를 위해서 담당 인력의 확충과 담당자의 교육 및 역
    량 개발이 가장 중요함
    ¡ 따라서, 발전사업허가 업무를 전담하는 담당자를 배치하고, 과거 발전사업허가 신
    청 건 수를 바탕으로 적정 인원에 대한 가이드라인을 제시
    ¡ 발전사업 허가 업무와 관련한 검토 기준이나 매뉴얼 또는 세부 기준을 산업부 차
    원에서 명확하게 제시하여 업무 담당자의 혼선 또는 부담을 경감해야 함

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제 1 장 서론 ························································································································································· 1
    • 1절. 연구의 배경 및 목적 ···························································································································· 2
    • 2절. 연구의 범위 및 내용 ······························································································································ 4
    • 제 2 장 발번사업허가 관련 현황 ···················································································································· 5
    • 1절. 발전사업허가 업무 관련 현황 ············································································································· 6
    • 제 1 장 서론 ························································································································································· 1
    • 1절. 연구의 배경 및 목적 ···························································································································· 2
    • 2절. 연구의 범위 및 내용 ······························································································································ 4
    • 제 2 장 발번사업허가 관련 현황 ···················································································································· 5
    • 1절. 발전사업허가 업무 관련 현황 ············································································································· 6
    • 1. 발전사업허가 개요 ·································································································································· 6
    • 2. 발전사업허가 업무 체계 ························································································································ 8
    • 3. 발전사업허가 관련 법규 ························································································································ 9
    • 2절. 발전사업허가 실행 현황 ······················································································································ 14
    • 1. 지자체별 태양광 발전사업허가 현황 ································································································· 14
    • 2. 지자체별 풍력 발전사업허가 현황 ····································································································· 15
    • 제 3 장 조사 및 분석 방법 ··························································································································· 16
    • 1절. 조사 대상 및 기간 ······························································································································ 17
    • 2절. 설문지 구성 및 분석 방법 ················································································································ 19
    • 1. 설문지 구성 및 내용 ···························································································································· 19
    • 2. 분석 방법 ················································································································································ 21
    • 제 4 장 조사 결과 ··········································································································································· 25
    • 1절. 지자체 조사 결과 ································································································································ 26
    • 1. 설문지 회수 결과 ·································································································································· 26
    • 2. 일반현황 분석 ········································································································································ 27
    • 3. 발전사업허가 업무 관련 중요도 AHP 분석 ····················································································· 30
    • 4. 발전사업인허가권 이양 확대 의견 분석 ··························································································· 34
    • 5. 기타 서술형 의견 ·································································································································· 45
    • 2절. 기업체 조사 결과 ·································································································································· 49
    • 1. 설문지 회수 결과 ·································································································································· 49
    • 2. 기업 의견 취합 결과 ···························································································································· 49
    • 3절. 전문가 자문의견 ·································································································································· 54
    • 1. 전문가 자문의견 요약 ·························································································································· 54
    • 2. 전문가 자문 전체 의견 ························································································································ 54
    • 제 5 장 결론 및 정책 제언 ··························································································································· 59
    • 1절 설문조사 및 자문의견 결론 ················································································································ 60
    • 2절 정책제언 ················································································································································· 62
    • [부록] 지자체 및 기업 대상 설문지 문항 ···································································································· 65
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼