调解中自愿原则制度化前后样态对比分析 : 比较法视角下的考察及启示

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

自愿原则作为调解的基本原则，这基本上是中外学者们的共识。虽然自愿原则获得普遍性的珍视，人们普遍反对对自愿原则的侵犯，但是国内的理论研究中却忽视了一个非常重要的问题：正如人们经由自然状态转入市民社会时，人所享有的原初自然权利会受到限制一样，调解中的自愿原则在制度化时，也会受到某些限制。国内理论研究对此问题的忽视，会导致对制度化后的自愿原则形态发生错误的认识，进而错误的批判一些立法与司法现象。比较法视角下对调解中自愿原则制度化前后样态的对比分析，将有助于避免此类错误。

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Chinese and foreign scholars have consensus that Voluntary principle is a fundamental principle of mediation in the civil procedure. Although the value of the voluntary principle is cherished by all persons, but the domestic theoretical studies ignore one very important question: As one state changed from natural state to civil society, the original natural rights people enjoyed will be limited, the voluntary principle in mediation is institutionalized, it will be subject to some restrictions too. Ignoring this problem will lead to some mistakes, and thus wrongly critique some legislative and judicial phenomenon. With the help of comparative method, contrasting the state of voluntary principle before it being institutionalized and the state of voluntary principle after it being institutionalized will help avoid such mistakes.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 一、引 言
• 二、调解自愿原则的原初样态
• （一）调解启动上的原初样态
• （二）调解演进中的原初样态
• （三）调解终结时的原初样态
• 三、制度化后调解自愿原则的新生样态
• （一）调解启动上的强制因素
• （二）调解演进中的强制因素
• （三）调解终结时的强制因素
• 四、对比分析及启示

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 宋明志, "论法院调解的强制性——以我国台湾地区民事强制调解程序为比较" (1) : 2008

2 肖建华和杨兵, "论我国诉讼调解原则体系之重构" (2) : 2005

3 范愉, "纠纷解决的理论与实践" 清华大学出版社 2007

4 李浩, "民事诉讼法学" 法律出版社 2011

5 肖建华和杨兵, "对抗制与调解制度的冲突与融合-美国调解制度对我国的启 示" (4) : 2006

6 Leonard L. Riskin, "Understanding Mediators' Orientations, Strategies, and Techniques: A Grid for the Perplexed" (1) : 1996

7 Hazel Genn, "Twisting arms court referred and court linked mediation under judicial pressure" Crown Copyright 2007

8 Matthew Brunsdon-Tully, "There is an A in ADR but does anyone know what it means any more?" 28 (28): 218-237, 2009

9 Lela P. Love, "The Top Ten Reasons Why Mediation Should Not Evaluate" 24 : 937-, 1996

10 Nancy A. Welsh, "The Thinning Vision of Self-Determination in Court- Connected Mediation: The Inevitable Pice of Institutionalization?" 6 : 2001

11 A.M. Pugh, "The Inherent Power of the Federal Courts to Compel Participation in Nonbinding Forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution" 42 : 1-, 2003

12 Marc Galanter, "The Emergence of the Judge as a Mediator in Civil Cases" 69 : 257-, 1985

13 Roselle L. Wissler, "The Effects of Mandatory Mediation: Empirical Research on the Experience of Small Claims and Common Pleas Court" 33 : 565-, 1997

14 Jennifer Beer Et Al, "Peacemaking in Your Neighborhood: Mediator’s Handbook" 1982

15 Leonard L. Riskin, "Mediator Orientations, Strategies, and Techniques" 12 : 111-, 1994

16 Stephen B. Goldberg, "Dispute Resolution (Fifth Edition)" 2007

17 Simon Roberts, "Dispute Processes–ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision Making" Cambridge University Press 2007

18 Edward F. Sherman, "Court-Mandated Alternative Dispute Resolution: What From of Particpation Should Be Required?" 46 : 2079-, 1993

19 Richard Ingleby, "Court Sponsored Mediation: The Case Against Mandatory Participation" 56 : 1993

20 Shirley Shipman, "Compulsory mediation: the elephant in the room" 30 (30): 163-191, 2011

21 Shirley Shipman, "Compulsory mediation: the elephant in the" 30 (30): 163-191, 2011

22 Timothy Hedeen, "Coercion and Self-Determination in Court-Connected Mediation: All Mediations Are Voluntary, But Some Are More Voluntary Than Others" 26 : 273-, 2005