RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      노인학대에 관한 법정책적 연구 = A Study on Current Legal System of Elder Abuse

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      A Study on Current Legal System of Elder Abuse Seon-Hyub Kim Professional Researcher, The Institute Comparative Law and Legal Culture Dongguk University

      The abuse of elders who violates the human rights of the elderly in association with the increase of the elderly population is continuously increasing, which is a social problem. Laws currently punishing elder abuse include the Elderly Welfare Act, the Criminal Code, the Special Act on the Punishment of Domestic Violence Crimes, and the Act on the Prevention of Domestic Violence and Victim Protection. However, the current law to which elder abuse is applied consists only of regulation and punishment in the legislative system, and it is not effective to cope with elder abuse because it is not specified and subdivided by legislative technology. Therefore, in order to effectively deal with elder abuse, a field of elder human rights, it was necessary to discuss legal policy for improving the current legislation of elder abuse.
      In this paper, we examined the legislative direction in terms of legislative system and legislative technology in terms of elder abuse. The special legislation related to the abuser or victim of elder abuse not only mimics the existing system and regulations of the old man's welfare law, but also does not have more detailed and detailed rules. In addition, it is considered that raising only relevant punishment provisions does not properly understand the characteristics of family crimes that occur among families in relation to elder abuse. Although the special law should have meaning and existence as a special law, the question is whether the special law enactment, which is one of the abusers or victims of elder abuse, is a fundamental countermeasure against elder abuse. The recently enacted special law enacts the system and regulations of the current Elderly Welfare Act as it is, thus raising the issue of double legislation and double legislation. Therefore, I would like to propose the following legislative direction.
      First of all, the second legislation, the second legislative bill, recently proposed a special law (special bill on the punishment of crimes for abused senior citizens, bill for the support of elderly victims of abuse, and protection of the rights and support of the victims of abused elders). In view of this, we propose the view that the legislation of the special law needs to considerably add to the regulations with the system and regulations covering elder abuse victims and perpetrators. Therefore, the legislative method of initiating and enacting a separate government bill that comprehensively replaces the three bills would be justified in terms of legal unity. The first measure, the best, is that the Elderly Welfare Act has been operated as a parental law on the prevention and eradication of elder abuse, and suggests that it is necessary to specify and refine the relevant regulations through complementary legislation on the existing Elderly Welfare Act.
      The following support the view on complementary legislation on the First Welfare Act on the Aged Welfare Act and reviewed some regulations. First, the necessity of expanding the subjects of criminal abuse and the abuse related to elder abuse, and the second, the necessity of expanding the manpower dedicated to elder abuse and the use of dedicated shelter, and third, the elderly We have thoroughly examined the necessity of implementing anti-abuse prevention measures and introducing a protection order system, and the fourth, the necessity of installing CCTVs for elderly nursing homes and the necessity of activating emergency telephones. It is expected to have a positive effect on the prevention and reduction of elder abuse. I hope these suggestions will be actively reflected in the policy.
      번역하기

      A Study on Current Legal System of Elder Abuse Seon-Hyub Kim Professional Researcher, The Institute Comparative Law and Legal Culture Dongguk University The abuse of elders who violates the human rights of the elderly in association with the increas...

      A Study on Current Legal System of Elder Abuse Seon-Hyub Kim Professional Researcher, The Institute Comparative Law and Legal Culture Dongguk University

      The abuse of elders who violates the human rights of the elderly in association with the increase of the elderly population is continuously increasing, which is a social problem. Laws currently punishing elder abuse include the Elderly Welfare Act, the Criminal Code, the Special Act on the Punishment of Domestic Violence Crimes, and the Act on the Prevention of Domestic Violence and Victim Protection. However, the current law to which elder abuse is applied consists only of regulation and punishment in the legislative system, and it is not effective to cope with elder abuse because it is not specified and subdivided by legislative technology. Therefore, in order to effectively deal with elder abuse, a field of elder human rights, it was necessary to discuss legal policy for improving the current legislation of elder abuse.
      In this paper, we examined the legislative direction in terms of legislative system and legislative technology in terms of elder abuse. The special legislation related to the abuser or victim of elder abuse not only mimics the existing system and regulations of the old man's welfare law, but also does not have more detailed and detailed rules. In addition, it is considered that raising only relevant punishment provisions does not properly understand the characteristics of family crimes that occur among families in relation to elder abuse. Although the special law should have meaning and existence as a special law, the question is whether the special law enactment, which is one of the abusers or victims of elder abuse, is a fundamental countermeasure against elder abuse. The recently enacted special law enacts the system and regulations of the current Elderly Welfare Act as it is, thus raising the issue of double legislation and double legislation. Therefore, I would like to propose the following legislative direction.
      First of all, the second legislation, the second legislative bill, recently proposed a special law (special bill on the punishment of crimes for abused senior citizens, bill for the support of elderly victims of abuse, and protection of the rights and support of the victims of abused elders). In view of this, we propose the view that the legislation of the special law needs to considerably add to the regulations with the system and regulations covering elder abuse victims and perpetrators. Therefore, the legislative method of initiating and enacting a separate government bill that comprehensively replaces the three bills would be justified in terms of legal unity. The first measure, the best, is that the Elderly Welfare Act has been operated as a parental law on the prevention and eradication of elder abuse, and suggests that it is necessary to specify and refine the relevant regulations through complementary legislation on the existing Elderly Welfare Act.
      The following support the view on complementary legislation on the First Welfare Act on the Aged Welfare Act and reviewed some regulations. First, the necessity of expanding the subjects of criminal abuse and the abuse related to elder abuse, and the second, the necessity of expanding the manpower dedicated to elder abuse and the use of dedicated shelter, and third, the elderly We have thoroughly examined the necessity of implementing anti-abuse prevention measures and introducing a protection order system, and the fourth, the necessity of installing CCTVs for elderly nursing homes and the necessity of activating emergency telephones. It is expected to have a positive effect on the prevention and reduction of elder abuse. I hope these suggestions will be actively reflected in the policy.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 국가인권위원회, 2003

      2 강동욱, "「노인복지법」상 노인학대에 관한 규정의 개정방안" 법학연구소 22 (22): 209-248, 2019

      3 이재상, "형법각론" 박영사 2016

      4 법제사법위원회 수석전문위원 남궁석, "형법 일부개정법률안 검토보고서" 2015

      5 민병두의원 대표발의, "형법 일부개정법률안"

      6 김재경, "한국에서 노인 학대에 관한 고찰" 한국효학회 0 (0): 203-237, 2017

      7 김동하, "한국 지역사회 거주 노인학대 연구의 체계적 고찰" 한국노년학회 36 (36): 1003-1024, 2016

      8 선영화, "학대피해노인의 보호를 위한 방안" 한국법정책학회 17 (17): 169-196, 2017

      9 보건복지위원회 수석전문위원 김승기, "학대피해노인의 권리보호와 지원에 관한 법률안검토보고서(인재근의원 대표발의)" 2016

      10 보건복지위원회 수석전문위원 김승기, "학대피해노인의 권리보호와 지원에 관한 법률안검토보고서" 2016

      1 국가인권위원회, 2003

      2 강동욱, "「노인복지법」상 노인학대에 관한 규정의 개정방안" 법학연구소 22 (22): 209-248, 2019

      3 이재상, "형법각론" 박영사 2016

      4 법제사법위원회 수석전문위원 남궁석, "형법 일부개정법률안 검토보고서" 2015

      5 민병두의원 대표발의, "형법 일부개정법률안"

      6 김재경, "한국에서 노인 학대에 관한 고찰" 한국효학회 0 (0): 203-237, 2017

      7 김동하, "한국 지역사회 거주 노인학대 연구의 체계적 고찰" 한국노년학회 36 (36): 1003-1024, 2016

      8 선영화, "학대피해노인의 보호를 위한 방안" 한국법정책학회 17 (17): 169-196, 2017

      9 보건복지위원회 수석전문위원 김승기, "학대피해노인의 권리보호와 지원에 관한 법률안검토보고서(인재근의원 대표발의)" 2016

      10 보건복지위원회 수석전문위원 김승기, "학대피해노인의 권리보호와 지원에 관한 법률안검토보고서" 2016

      11 인재근의원 대표발의, "학대피해노인의 권리보호와 지원에 관한 법률안"

      12 보건복지위원회 수석전문위원 석영환, "학대피해노인 지원법안 검토보고서" 2017

      13 박인숙 의원 대표발의, "학대피해노인 지원법"

      14 "충청북도노인전문보호기관 홈페이지"

      15 "충청남도노인보호전문기관 홈페이지"

      16 "전라북도노인보호전문기관 홈페이지"

      17 kbs 뉴스, "잊혀진 가정 폭력 ‘노인학대’ 체계적 대책 시급” 2017.4.17. 홈페이지"

      18 오윤진, "우리나라 노인 학대 현황과 노인 학대 예방을 위한 정책에 관한 연구" 한국공공정책학회 16 (16): 2009

      19 김은영, "여성노인의 노인학대 인식과 신고의향" 한국콘텐츠학회 14 (14): 238-249, 2014

      20 "서울특별시남부노인보호전문기관 홈페이지"

      21 "서영교의원 대표발의, 노인복지법 일부개정법률안"

      22 박종진, "사회적 약자 및 사회복지시설 분포특성" 동의대학교 대학원 2014

      23 표창원, "범죄 취약자 CCTV 등 범죄 감응 장치 설치에 관한 연구" 치안연구소 7 : 2001

      24 곽윤길, "범죄 예방과 대응을 위한 효율적인 CCTV 활용 방안" 한국치안행정학회 8 (8): 119-144, 2011

      25 법제사법위원회 전문위원 강남일, "민법 일부개정법률안 검토보고(민병두의원 대표발의)"

      26 민병두의원 대표발의, "민법 일부개정법률안"

      27 이미진, "노인학대유형별 노인 및 학대행위자 특성 비교: 노인보호전문기관의 노인학대사례 분석" 한국노인복지학회 71 (71): 53-89, 2016

      28 최영진, "노인학대에 관한 법적 대응방안" 법학연구소 27 (27): 65-93, 2019

      29 강동욱, "노인학대에 관한 법률의 입법방향에 대한비판적 고찰" 법학연구소 20 (20): 285-310, 2019

      30 박명재 의원 대표발의, "노인학대범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법안 검토보고서" 법제사법위원회 2016

      31 박명재 의원 대표발의, "노인학대범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법안 검토보고서" 법제사법위원회 2015

      32 박명재 의원 대표발의, "노인학대범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법안"

      33 박명재의원 대표발의, "노인학대범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법안"

      34 문영희, "노인학대방지를 위한 법정책적 개선방안" 법학연구소 21 (21): 199-235, 2018

      35 최상섭, "노인학대 현황 및 대책" 한국의료법학회 2008

      36 김원천, "노인학대 유형분석에 관한 연구 -중복학대를 중심으로-" 한국지역사회복지학회 (38) : 141-160, 2011

      37 황영희, "노인학대 실태와 대책방안 고찰" 한국사회복지지원학회 4 (4): 2009

      38 김혜성, "노인학대 사례 분석을 통하여 본 노인학대와 가정폭력 문제" 사단법인 인문사회과학기술융합학회 7 (7): 499-508, 2017

      39 이윤경, "노인학대 대응정책의 현황과 과제" 한국보건사회연구원 (239) : 2016

      40 김신겸, "노인학대" 대한노인정신의학회 14 (14): 3-8, 2010

      41 허은실, "노인인권개념 및 학대에 관한 고찰" 한서대학교 대학원 2010

      42 권중돈, "노인인권 길라잡이" 국가인권위원회 2014

      43 권금주, "노인인권 관점에서 노인학대 정책 방향 모색" 참여연대사회복지위원회 (211) : 2016

      44 최순옥, "노인복지의 이해" 태영출판사 2016

      45 보건복지위원회 수석전문위원 석영환, "노인복지법 일부개정법률안, 검토보고서" 2017

      46 심재원의원 대표발의, "노인복지법 일부개정법률안"

      47 배석연, "노인 학대의 예방에 관한 연구" 한국엔터테인먼트산업학회 6 (6): 328-338, 2012

      48 박금령, "노인 학대가 우울에 미치는 영향: 학대의 유형과 중복 경험, 성별 비교를 중심으로" 한국보건사회연구원 37 (37): 170-190, 2017

      49 김재곤, "노인 인권법 입법방안에 관한 연구 : 사전적 입법평가를 중심으로" 동신대학교 대학원 2013

      50 "경상북도노인보호전문기관홈페이지"

      51 김영일, "가정폭력의 법적대응과 개선방안" 원광대학교 대학원 2016

      52 강동욱, "「노인복지법」상 노인학대에 관한 규정의 검토와 개선방안" 법학연구소 32 (32): 23-49, 2015

      53 장윤정, "FSM을 이용한 노인학대 발생요인에 대한 사회복지사의 의식구조 분석" 한국지능시스템학회 26 (26): 458-463, 2016

      54 보건복지부, "2017 노인보건복지 사업안내(Ⅱ)" 2017

      55 통계청, "2016 고령자통계"

      56 보건복지부, "2015 노인학대 현황보고서" 보건복지부 2016

      57 통계청, "2015 고령자통계"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼