RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      보건소 노인의치 보철사업 업무수행 평가 = The study on evaluation of the denture delivery program at the public health centers in Korea보건소 노인의치 보철사업 업무수행 평가

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76618320

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate denture delivery program for older people of the public health centers in Korea. Methods: The assessment tool developed in the study consists of the following three domains-`Construction,` `Process`, and `Outcome`. For the individual evaluation of denture delivery program, authors designed 6 question items on `Construction` domain, 5 question items on `Process` domain and 6 question items on `Outcome` domain. Validity test of all questionnaires were carried out by preliminary survey (Cronbach`s Alpha=0.753). Program self evaluation sheets were distributed to nationwide 242 public health center, and 103 centers replied. Mean evaluation score(full mark) and correlation between question items were produced from evaluation replies. Results: 1. Total self-evaluated score was relatively low as 64.15(100), so it needed the overall reappraise the program. 2. Construction indices were revealed as 21.94 (30), and administrative guidance should be suggested. 3. It revealed so low remarks on the process appraisal, estimated as 20.23 that we should consider for proper setting of dental workforces. 4. It was calculated as low score 21.98 (40) in the results indices, so organised systems should focus on the denture delivery program can make promotion of patients oral health. 5. The results indices score explained 20.9% of evaluation model(p<0.001) by the linear regression model analysis. Strategic plan, physical resources, program management were statistically significant variables effect on result score(p<0.05), but human power and organizational structure were not. Conclusions: Denture delivery program for older people need overall complement consideration about work process and more reliable evaluation system to be effectively performed.
      번역하기

      Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate denture delivery program for older people of the public health centers in Korea. Methods: The assessment tool developed in the study consists of the following three domains-`Construction,` `Process`, a...

      Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate denture delivery program for older people of the public health centers in Korea. Methods: The assessment tool developed in the study consists of the following three domains-`Construction,` `Process`, and `Outcome`. For the individual evaluation of denture delivery program, authors designed 6 question items on `Construction` domain, 5 question items on `Process` domain and 6 question items on `Outcome` domain. Validity test of all questionnaires were carried out by preliminary survey (Cronbach`s Alpha=0.753). Program self evaluation sheets were distributed to nationwide 242 public health center, and 103 centers replied. Mean evaluation score(full mark) and correlation between question items were produced from evaluation replies. Results: 1. Total self-evaluated score was relatively low as 64.15(100), so it needed the overall reappraise the program. 2. Construction indices were revealed as 21.94 (30), and administrative guidance should be suggested. 3. It revealed so low remarks on the process appraisal, estimated as 20.23 that we should consider for proper setting of dental workforces. 4. It was calculated as low score 21.98 (40) in the results indices, so organised systems should focus on the denture delivery program can make promotion of patients oral health. 5. The results indices score explained 20.9% of evaluation model(p<0.001) by the linear regression model analysis. Strategic plan, physical resources, program management were statistically significant variables effect on result score(p<0.05), but human power and organizational structure were not. Conclusions: Denture delivery program for older people need overall complement consideration about work process and more reliable evaluation system to be effectively performed.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 남철현, "지역사회보건과 건강증진" 도서출판테일사 193-201, 2001

      2 통계청, "연령별 추계인구(1960-2030). 서울:통계청"

      3 보건복지가족부, "사전정보공표자료"

      4 김철웅, "보건소 업무수행성과 평가 체계 개발" 건강증진사업지원단 2007

      5 서영준, "보건소 건강증진사업 수행과정의 질 평가지표 개발" 한국보건사회연구원 2003

      6 최영희, "노인과 건강. 개정판" 현문사 32-35, 2006

      7 보건복지부, "국민건강증진사업편람" 보건복지부 2001

      8 변종화, "국민건강증진사업의 운영 및 평가체계개발" 한국보건사회연구원 1999

      9 박덕영, "구강보건사업 평가 체계 개발에 관한 연구" 21-22, 2001

      10 Donabedian A, "The definition of quality and approaches to its assessments" 24 (24): 101-109, 1980

      1 남철현, "지역사회보건과 건강증진" 도서출판테일사 193-201, 2001

      2 통계청, "연령별 추계인구(1960-2030). 서울:통계청"

      3 보건복지가족부, "사전정보공표자료"

      4 김철웅, "보건소 업무수행성과 평가 체계 개발" 건강증진사업지원단 2007

      5 서영준, "보건소 건강증진사업 수행과정의 질 평가지표 개발" 한국보건사회연구원 2003

      6 최영희, "노인과 건강. 개정판" 현문사 32-35, 2006

      7 보건복지부, "국민건강증진사업편람" 보건복지부 2001

      8 변종화, "국민건강증진사업의 운영 및 평가체계개발" 한국보건사회연구원 1999

      9 박덕영, "구강보건사업 평가 체계 개발에 관한 연구" 21-22, 2001

      10 Donabedian A, "The definition of quality and approaches to its assessments" 24 (24): 101-109, 1980

      11 Meeuwissen JH, "Satisfaction with reduced dentition in elderly people" 22 (22): 397-401, 1995

      12 Gillbert GH, "Satisfaction with chewing ability in a diverse sample of dentate adults" 25 (25): 15-27, 1998

      13 Budtz-Jorgensen E, "Nutrition and oral health" 15 (15): 885-896, 2001

      14 Hirano H, "Masticatory ability in relation to oral status and general health on aging" 3 (3): 48-52, 1999

      15 Hawe H, "Evaluation Health Promotion" Sydney Philadelphia 86-173, 1994

      16 Ekelund R, "Dental state and subjective chewing ability of institutionalized elderly people" 17 (17): 24-27, 1998

      17 Boretti G, "A Review of masticatory ability and efficiency" 74 (74): 400-403, 1995

      18 보건복지가족부, "2009년도 구강보건사업안내" 보건복지가족부 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2014-09-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한구강보건학회 -> 대한예방치과·구강보건학회
      영문명 : Korean Academy Of Oral Health -> The Korean Academy of Preventive Dentistry and Oral Health
      KCI등재
      2012-05-03 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Academy Of Dental Health -> Korean Academy Of Oral Health KCI등재
      2012-05-03 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Journal of the Korean Academy of Dental Health -> Journal of Korean Academy of Oral Health KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.09 1.09 1.07
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.01 0.91 1.746 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼