RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    21세기 변화 중의 미중관계와 북핵문제 = The Evolving U.S.-China Relations in the 21st Century and North Korean Nuclear Issue

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103963435

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The 2nd North Korean Nuclear Crisis has been deteriorating since 2002 when it occurred. The North Korean nuclear issue has become the subject of complicated international political games. It provides the United States and China with a delicate juncture of cooperation. The U.S.-China relations will be the most important international variable in the process of North Korean nuclear crisis. It will be unrealistic if one neglects the variable. The purpose of this article is to find the correlation between the North Korean nuclear crisis and evolving the U.S-China relations and its implications.


    The nature of the U.S.-China relations can be characterized as 'subtlety' and 'complexity.' How to decipher the U.S.-China relations is critical of finding out the solution of the crisis. The U.S.-China relations have experienced a considerable change after Obama came to power. Understanding such evolving the U.S.-China relations is not an easy task, given the magnitude, complexity of issues involved.


    The North Korean nuclear crisis becomes a symbolic topos, illustrating the degree of the U.S.-China cooperation. Coincidently, the deeper the cooperation is, the more influence over the cooperation North Korea has. The U.S. and China's views over how to achieve the policy objective of denuclearization of North Korea are different although the U.S. and China shares the goals of denuclearization, non-proliferation, and priority on stability. These situations make the prospectus for denuclearization of North Korea difficult. It is the very time that South Korea must take more progressive and creative actions to resolve this crisis in which it becomes a political game between the U.S. and China.
    번역하기

    The 2nd North Korean Nuclear Crisis has been deteriorating since 2002 when it occurred. The North Korean nuclear issue has become the subject of complicated international political games. It provides the United States and China with a delicate junctur...

    The 2nd North Korean Nuclear Crisis has been deteriorating since 2002 when it occurred. The North Korean nuclear issue has become the subject of complicated international political games. It provides the United States and China with a delicate juncture of cooperation. The U.S.-China relations will be the most important international variable in the process of North Korean nuclear crisis. It will be unrealistic if one neglects the variable. The purpose of this article is to find the correlation between the North Korean nuclear crisis and evolving the U.S-China relations and its implications.


    The nature of the U.S.-China relations can be characterized as 'subtlety' and 'complexity.' How to decipher the U.S.-China relations is critical of finding out the solution of the crisis. The U.S.-China relations have experienced a considerable change after Obama came to power. Understanding such evolving the U.S.-China relations is not an easy task, given the magnitude, complexity of issues involved.


    The North Korean nuclear crisis becomes a symbolic topos, illustrating the degree of the U.S.-China cooperation. Coincidently, the deeper the cooperation is, the more influence over the cooperation North Korea has. The U.S. and China's views over how to achieve the policy objective of denuclearization of North Korea are different although the U.S. and China shares the goals of denuclearization, non-proliferation, and priority on stability. These situations make the prospectus for denuclearization of North Korea difficult. It is the very time that South Korea must take more progressive and creative actions to resolve this crisis in which it becomes a political game between the U.S. and China.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 신종호, "천안함사태이후미 중관계" 2010

    2 김흥규, "중국의부상, 동북아안보, 그리고한국의전략, In 동북아 국제정치와 한반도의 미래" NEAR 재단

    3 최우선, "중국의 부상과 미국의 대응, In 주요국제문제분석" 외교안보연구원 2011

    4 김흥규, "중국의 동반자외교 小考: 개념, 전개 및 함의에 대한 이해" 한국정치학회 43 (43): 287-305, 2009

    5 김흥규, "북핵문제와 한반도 평화정착, In 북핵문제와 한반도 평화정착" 한울 198-248, 2008

    6 김흥규, "미중정상회담이한국대외정책에주는교훈"

    7 김흥규, "미국 오바마 행정부의 출범과 전략적 미₩중관계의 형성, In 주요국제문제분석" 외교안보연구원 2009

    8 김재철, "미 중관계의변화와한국, In 우리에게중국은 무엇인가: 현대 중국의 분야별 진단" 경제인문사회연구회 2010

    9 人民日報, "開啓中美合作工?的新篇章"

    10 韓玉貴, "冷戰後的美中關係" 社會科學文獻出版社 2007

    1 신종호, "천안함사태이후미 중관계" 2010

    2 김흥규, "중국의부상, 동북아안보, 그리고한국의전략, In 동북아 국제정치와 한반도의 미래" NEAR 재단

    3 최우선, "중국의 부상과 미국의 대응, In 주요국제문제분석" 외교안보연구원 2011

    4 김흥규, "중국의 동반자외교 小考: 개념, 전개 및 함의에 대한 이해" 한국정치학회 43 (43): 287-305, 2009

    5 김흥규, "북핵문제와 한반도 평화정착, In 북핵문제와 한반도 평화정착" 한울 198-248, 2008

    6 김흥규, "미중정상회담이한국대외정책에주는교훈"

    7 김흥규, "미국 오바마 행정부의 출범과 전략적 미₩중관계의 형성, In 주요국제문제분석" 외교안보연구원 2009

    8 김재철, "미 중관계의변화와한국, In 우리에게중국은 무엇인가: 현대 중국의 분야별 진단" 경제인문사회연구회 2010

    9 人民日報, "開啓中美合作工?的新篇章"

    10 韓玉貴, "冷戰後的美中關係" 社會科學文獻出版社 2007

    11 陶文釗, "中美關係史1911-1950" 重慶出版社 1993

    12 何興强, "中美關係史" 中國社會科學出版社 2005

    13 熊志勇, "中美關係60年" 人民出版社 2009

    14 陶美心, "中美長期對話" 中國社會科學出版社 2001

    15 中國現代國際關係硏究院美國硏究所, "中美戰略關係新論" 時事出版社 2008

    16 中華人民共和國外交部, "中國同美國的關系"

    17 Shah, Anup, "World Military Spending: US Military Spending"

    18 Zeollick, Robert B, "Whither China: From Membership to Responsibility?"

    19 Lawrence Susan V, "US-China Relations: Policy Issues, In CRS Report for Congress" CRS 2011

    20 Independent Task Force, "U.S.-China Relations: An Affirmative Agenda, AResponsible Course" Council on Foreign Relations

    21 Mao, Zedong, "Two Intermediate Zones" Renmin Publisher (8) : 1999

    22 Mearsheimer, John J, "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" Norton 2001

    23 Wei, Da, "The Three Faces of Power" Contemporary International Relations 2010

    24 Brown, Michael E., "The Rise of China" The MIT Press 2000

    25 Kennedy, Paul M, "The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers" VintageBooks 1987

    26 Dai, Bingguo, "Stick to the Path of Peaceful Development" 2010

    27 Jiang, Ye, "Readjustment of China’s Major-Powers Strategy in Its All-Dimensional Diplomacy Since the Reform and Opening up" (90) : 28-29, 2009

    28 Lampton, David M, "Paradigm Lost: The Demise of ‘Weak China’" National Interest 2005

    29 Myers, Ramon H., "MakingChina Policy: Lessons from the Bush and Clinton Administrations" Rowman & Littlefield 2001

    30 Lieberthal, Kenneth, "How Domestic Forces Shape the PRC’s Grand Strategyand International Impact, In Domestic Political Change and Grand Strategy" NBR(The National Bureau of Asain Research) 29-68, 2007

    31 Heungkyu Kim, "From a Buffer Zone to a Strategic Burden: Evolving Sino-North Korea Relations during Hu Jintao Era" 한국국방연구원 22 (22): 57-74, 2010

    32 Shambaugh, David, "Coping with a Conflicted China" 34 (34): 7-27, 2011

    33 Yi, Shen, "Consensus Based on Mutual Respect and Equality: The Conerstoneof ‘Strategic Reassuarance’" 2009

    34 Bergsten, C. Fred, "China’s Rise: Challenges and Opportunities" United Book Press 2008

    35 Swaine, Michael D, "China: Domestic Change and Foreign Policy" RAND 1995

    36 Ash, Robert, "China Watching:Perspectives from Europe, Japan and the United States" Routledge 2007

    37 Mann, James, "About Face: A History of America’s Curious Relationship withChina, from Nixon to Clinton" Vintage Books 2000

    38 Hachigan, Nina, "A Global Imperative:A Progressive Approach to U.S.-China Relations in the 21st Century" Center for American Progress 2008

    39 이희옥, "2010년: 중국과한반도" 5 (5): 50-55, 2010

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-07-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korea and World Politics KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.92 0.92 0.91
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.88 0.95 1.328 0.24
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼