정부 보조금 지원방식별 실업자 직업훈련의 성과 분석 = Analyzing the Outcomes of Training for the Unemployed by the Types of the Subsidization Payment System

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of the study was to analyze the performance of training for the unemployed by the types of the subsidization payment system: provider-oriented payment system vs. customer-oriented payment system. Pubic training system for the unemployed was originally set by the provider-oriented payment system, which means the government has been spending the subsidy to training institutions that provide the training service to the unemployment. Recently, the government was changing the payment system with the customer-oriented system, which means the unemployed has rights to pay their own training fee as the service recipients. We explored what types of the subsidy payment system have impacted on the unemployed`s re-employment and what factors have influenced these results by the types of payment system. The results were as follow. The provider-oriented payment system has outperformed the customer-oriented payment system in terms of employment rates, early employment rate, and the acquisition of professional certificates. Also, the influential factors impacting the performance of the unemployed were different by the types. That means, it is not conclusive that the provider-oriented payment system has been superior to the customer-oriented payment system due to the training cost per capita, training institutions, vocational counselling, and training management process. However, we need to examine the various types of training payment system to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the public payment system.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 남윤형, "훈련직종 개편 및 녹색성장 국가전략직종 등에 관한 훈련비 지원기준 연구" 한국산업인력공단 2010

2 최영섭, "훈련비용 기준단가 실태조사·분석연구" 한국산업인력공단 2009

3 남윤형, "훈련비 단가 결정체계 및 기준에 관한 연구" 한국산업인력관리공단 2009

4 이종훈, "훈련비 기준단가 체계 개편방안 연구" 한국노동경제학회 2008

5 강순희, "훈련비 기준단가 제도의 역할 및 발전 방안에관한 연구" 한국산업인력관리공단 2011

6 채창균, "평생직업능력개발 체제의 혁신" 한국직업능력개발원 2010

7 함성득, "총액배분자율편성제도의 효과에 관한 실증적 연구: 교육과학기술부 교육 분야 예산의 점증성을 중심으로" 한국행정연구소 48 (48): 295-323, 2010

8 정택수, "직업능력개발제도 변천사" 한국직업능력개발원 2008

9 박성정, "직업능력개발계좌제 참여 경력단절여성의 훈련성과 제고방안" 한국여성정책연구원 2011

10 나영선, "직업능력개발계좌제 발전방안 연구" 한국직업능력개발원 2009

11 이상준, "직업능력개발 계좌제의 정책 효과와 실업자 훈련의 잠금 효과" 한국경제학회 60 (60): 33-67, 2012

12 고혜원, "직업능력개발 계좌제 운영 현황과 향후 개선방향" 13 (13): 5-29, 2010

13 전유정, "주요국 연구기관의 블록펀딩(Block Funding) 지원 동향 및 시사점" 한국과학기술정책연구원 2011

14 장홍근, "자리창출 교육 및 훈련사업군 심층평가 - 실업자 훈련부문" 15-35, 2011

15 유경준, "실업자 직업훈련의 효과 추정" 한국노동경제학회 31 (31): 59-103, 2008

16 김병주, "대학재정 지원을 위한 포뮬러 지표개발 및 재정운용의자율성 확대방안 연구" 학술진흥재단 2008

17 나영선, "근로자자율적능력개발제도와 계좌제 통합방안" 14 (14): 69-86, 2011

18 이주원, "국내기업의 ABC(Activity Based Costing) 도입실태 및 활용특성에 관한 연구" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2003

19 반상진, "고등교육재정 지원제도 개선 방안" 교육인적자원부 2005

20 Barnow, B. S., "Vouchers in U.S. vocational training programs: an overview of what we have learned" 2008

21 Tessaring, M., "Vocational education and training – key to the future. Lisbon-Copenhagen-Maastricht: mobilising for 2010" Cedefop synthesisreport 2004

22 이석원, "Propensity Score Matching 방법에 의한 실업자 직업훈련 사업의 효과성 평가" 한국행정학회 37 (37): 181-199, 2003

23 Hipp, L., "Market forces for the unemployed? training vouchers in Germany and the U. S" 42 (42): 77-101, 2007

24 Renkema, A., "Individual learning accounts : a strategy for lifelong learning?" 18 (18): 384-394, 2006

25 CEDEFOP, "Individual learning accounts" European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training 2009

26 Falch, T, "Financing lifelong learning: Funding mechanisms in education and training" European Commision Education and Culture 2011

27 Oosterbeek, H., "Financing lifelong learning" The World Bank 2008