RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      一元論的 隱喩觀 = A Monistic View of Metaphor

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2076569

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Many contemporary discussions of metaphor have taken for granted the primacy of literal language. They tried to interpret Mataphor in the light of literal, normal languages on condition that there are such things.
      These attitudes on metaphor resulted in theories such as Comparison theory, Interaction theory, and Feature theory,‥‥etc.
      All of these views failed in explaining and apprehending the full impact of metaphor, though they provided source understanding of it.
      The failure was due to the dualistic view which lays emphasis on the literal side of metaphor.
      It says that metaphors can be understood better or only through literal paraphrase.
      The view didn't understand the metaphorical nature of language.
      There are proofs that language is metaphorical in its nature considering the metaphoricalness in the human nature and in everyday language.
      On the basis of these proofs, this paper presents a new view of metaphor.
      "The point is that certain ways of apprehending things under the aspect of other things or qualities, usually spoken of as metaphor, operate to focus our thought on conditions and qualities in experiences and situations that we are dealing with"(G,Yoos)
      Thus, metaphors function much the same as felling someone to look out the window instead of a description of what is out the window. They are not literally descriptions but they are substitutes for descriptions.

      번역하기

      Many contemporary discussions of metaphor have taken for granted the primacy of literal language. They tried to interpret Mataphor in the light of literal, normal languages on condition that there are such things. These attitudes on metaphor result...

      Many contemporary discussions of metaphor have taken for granted the primacy of literal language. They tried to interpret Mataphor in the light of literal, normal languages on condition that there are such things.
      These attitudes on metaphor resulted in theories such as Comparison theory, Interaction theory, and Feature theory,‥‥etc.
      All of these views failed in explaining and apprehending the full impact of metaphor, though they provided source understanding of it.
      The failure was due to the dualistic view which lays emphasis on the literal side of metaphor.
      It says that metaphors can be understood better or only through literal paraphrase.
      The view didn't understand the metaphorical nature of language.
      There are proofs that language is metaphorical in its nature considering the metaphoricalness in the human nature and in everyday language.
      On the basis of these proofs, this paper presents a new view of metaphor.
      "The point is that certain ways of apprehending things under the aspect of other things or qualities, usually spoken of as metaphor, operate to focus our thought on conditions and qualities in experiences and situations that we are dealing with"(G,Yoos)
      Thus, metaphors function much the same as felling someone to look out the window instead of a description of what is out the window. They are not literally descriptions but they are substitutes for descriptions.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서 론
      • Ⅱ. 이원론적 은유관
      • 1. 비교론
      • 2. 상호작용론
      • 3. 자질이론
      • Ⅰ. 서 론
      • Ⅱ. 이원론적 은유관
      • 1. 비교론
      • 2. 상호작용론
      • 3. 자질이론
      • Ⅲ. 일원론적 은유관
      • 1. "문자적"이란 말의 의미
      • 2. 인간본성의 은유성
      • 3. 일상언어의 은유성
      • Ⅳ. 결 론
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼