자연법은 헌법적 효력을 갖는가?

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The natural law problem of present times is fundamentally different from that of modern times. Modern natural law theorists have no positive natural law, but we have it. It was pure in their imagination, but it is not pure in our real world. Of course, we can not ignore this legal contradiction which reflects the social contradiction.
For that reason, we can hardly accept the modern concept of imaginary natural law outside the present positive law. I argue that the natural law have no direct constitutional effect. The Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court are also in the same position. However, on the other hand, I argue that the natural law have the indirect constitutional effect which comes from a logical coherence of the constitutional system.
Will there be a future role of the modern natural law? The modern imaginary natural law theorist had dismantled the ideology of medieval times. At the same time, they had justified the positive law of capitalism. In that way, we should sublate the contradiction of the present positive law which reflects the social contradiction.
In conclusion, I argue that the present natural law is immanent in the positive law as the anti-positive law. It is reason and conscience which cause creation, change and extinction of the positive law. We should admit the role of the natural law within the historical limits and develop its progressive spirit dialectically.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 유진오, "헌법해의" 명세당 1949

2 Weber, Max, "헌법해석의 기본문제, In 헌법재판의 이론과 실제" 박영사 1993

3 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2009

4 김철수, "헌법학신론, 제19전정신판" 박영사 2009

5 김동희, "행정법상의 허가와 특허의 구별에 관한 소고, In 현대공법논총: 월암 변재옥박사 화갑기념" 월암 변재옥박사 화갑기념논문집 간행위원회 1994

6 나종일, "자유와 평등의 인권선언 문서집" 한울 2012

7 박은정, "자연법의 현 위치, In 사회과학논집: 죽헌 서희원박사 화갑기념특집" 이화여자대학교 법정대학 1984

8 박은정, "자연법사상" 민음사 1987

9 Kelsen, Hans, "자연법론(부록: 정의의 문제), In 순수법학" 길안사 1999

10 Bloch, Ernst, "자연법과 인간의 존엄성" 열린책들 2011

11 Welzel, Hans, "자연법과 실질적 정의" 삼영사 2001

12 Aristoteles, Nik. Ethik, "자연법과 실질적 정의" 삼영사 2001

13 나종일, "인간과 시민의 권리선언, In 자유와 평등의 인권선언 문서집" 한울 2012

14 Sophokles, "안티고네, In 희랍비극 Ⅰ" 현암사 1969

15 Kelsen, Hans, "순수법학" 길안사 1999

16 Ishay, Micheline, "세계인권사상사" 길 2005

17 대법원, "선고 95누5714 판결"

18 대법원, "선고 80도 306 판결"

19 대법원, "선고 74도3323 판결"

20 김욱, "법을 보는 법" 개마고원 2009

21 Ely, John Hart, "민주주의와 법원의 위헌심사" 나남출판 2006

22 Bailyn, Bernard, "미국혁명의 이데올로기적 기원" 새물결 1999

23 Hartz, Louis, "미국의 자유주의 전통: 독립혁명 이후 미국 정치사상의 해석" 나남 출판사 2012

24 안경환, "미국 연방헌법 수정 제9조의 의미" 서울대학교 법학연구소 38 (38): 1997

25 나종일, "미국 독립선언, In 자유와 평등의 인권선언 문서집" 한울 2012

26 정종섭, "기본권의 개념" 금붕어 2007

27 "국립국어원"

28 Marx, Karl., "공산주의당선언, In 자유와 평등의 인권선언 문서집" 한울 2012

29 Kelsen, Hans, "공산주의 법이론" 명지사 1983

30 나종일, "The Virginia Declaration of Rights, In 자유와 평등의 인권선언 문서집" 한울 2012

31 Engels, Friedrich, "The Housing Question, In Marx and Engels on Law" Academic Press 1979

32 Mensch, Elizabeth, "The History of Mainstream Legal Though, In The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique" Basic Books 1998

33 Marx, Karl, "The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, In Marx and Engels on Law" Academic Press 1979

34 Marx, Karl, "The Civil War in France-Address of the General Council, In Marx and Engels on Law" Academic Press 1979

35 Locke, John, "Second Treatise, In Two Treatises of Government, intro. Peter Laslett, 2nd Edition(Reprinted with amendments)" Cambridge University Press 1970

36 Marx, Karl, "On the Jewish Question, In Marx and Engels on Law" Academic Press 1979

37 Wolfe, Christopher, "Natural Law Liberalism" Cambridge University Press 2009

38 Hobbes, Thomas, "Leviathan, edited with an introduction" C. B. Macpherson, Penguin Books 1985

39 "Calder v. Bull, 3 Dall"

40 Tribe, Laurence H, "American Constitutional Law, Vol. One, 3rd ed" Foundation Press 2000

41 헌재, "95헌바1 결정"

42 헌재, "89헌마88 결정"

43 나종일, "1791년 헌법, In 자유와 평등의 인권선언 문서집" 한울 2012