“Laozi” shows a peculiar property when compared to other pre-Qin literature in respect of rhymes. Amongst the present “Wang Bi (王弼) edition” of “Laozi”, comprising 81 chapters, above half of sentences have rhymes, and this leads to the...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103513923
한경호 (동국대학교)
2016
Chinese
郭店楚簡 ; 老子 ; 押韻 ; 論理展開 ; 上古音 ; Guodian Chu Slips ; Laozi ; rhyme ; logic development ; Old Chinese
KCI등재
학술저널
31-47(17쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
“Laozi” shows a peculiar property when compared to other pre-Qin literature in respect of rhymes. Amongst the present “Wang Bi (王弼) edition” of “Laozi”, comprising 81 chapters, above half of sentences have rhymes, and this leads to the...
“Laozi” shows a peculiar property when compared to other pre-Qin literature in respect of rhymes. Amongst the present “Wang Bi (王弼) edition” of “Laozi”, comprising 81 chapters, above half of sentences have rhymes, and this leads to the readers accept “Laozi” as a philosophical poem. This feature tell us that we must follow a unique methodology when we study the “Laozi” in philological approach. Upon the findings described above (especially the rhyming phrases), this article discusses about the relationship between the rhymes and the logic development pattern, as appearing in the “Laozi” Group Jia(甲組) of Chu bamboo strips. Following is the findings of this study: There exists a relationship between the rhymes and logic development pattern in the chapters containing rhymes.
There are relatively large numbers of discrepancies between the rhymes of the edition excavated from Guodian (郭店) and the present edition. These may be because of copying errors, but some of them may be the presentation of the differences of versions.
From the point of view of the rhymes, logic development patterns of “Laozi” can be classified into three types: tripartite (initial part as introduction of a chapter, development parts as deductions or inductions, and final part as summary of the statements of previous parts and conclusion), bipartite (omitting the development parts, directly concluding the chapter), and “statement listing” type where there is no meaning in rhyme.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
與有押韻的其它先秦文獻相比,老子 一書顯得格外特別。傳世的王弼 老子 注本共八十一章,其中有 韻語的佔了大半,這種情況足以讓人把 老子 看成是一種哲學詩。這特點告訴我們,若要...
與有押韻的其它先秦文獻相比,老子 一書顯得格外特別。傳世的王弼 老子 注本共八十一章,其中有 韻語的佔了大半,這種情況足以讓人把 老子 看成是一種哲學詩。這特點告訴我們,若要從文獻學角度研 究 老子,就得使用某種特別的方法。考慮到以上特點(尤其是韻語),本文將以楚簡 老子 甲組為例,對 其押韻與論理展開方式的關係進行研究。通過這樣研究,可知以下的幾個點: 1) 老子 中含押韻篇章的押韻情況與論理展開方式,互有相關。 2) 郭店本的押韻情況同傳世本相比不同之處較多,可能有轉抄的問題,有的地方呈示出版本的差異。 3) 從押韻角度看來,老子的論理展開方式分成三種:“開頭部分是一章節的導入部分,展開部分是演繹或 歸納論理部分,結尾部分綜合展開部分的陳述做出結論”的三分式;省略了論理展開,直接進入結尾部 分的“兩分式”;押韻無意義的“各句並列式”。
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 劉笑敢, "노자철학" 도서출판청계 1997
2 李若暉, "郭店竹書老子論考" 齊魯書社 2004
3 池田知久, "郭店楚簡老子研究" 永鎮文化社 1999
4 李零, "郭店楚簡校讀記" 北京大學出版社 2001
5 荊門市博物館, "郭店楚墓竹簡" 文物出版社 1998
6 淺野浴一, "諸子百家<再発見> 掘り起こされる古代中国思想" 岩波書店 2004
7 朱謙之, "老子校釋" 中華書局 1984
8 劉笑敢, "老子古今" 中國社會科學出版社 2006
9 李學勤, "紀念林劍鳴教授史學林文基" 中國社會科學出版社 2002
10 潘悟雲, "漢藏語同源詞研究(一):漢藏語研究的歷史回顧" 廣西民族出版社 2000
1 劉笑敢, "노자철학" 도서출판청계 1997
2 李若暉, "郭店竹書老子論考" 齊魯書社 2004
3 池田知久, "郭店楚簡老子研究" 永鎮文化社 1999
4 李零, "郭店楚簡校讀記" 北京大學出版社 2001
5 荊門市博物館, "郭店楚墓竹簡" 文物出版社 1998
6 淺野浴一, "諸子百家<再発見> 掘り起こされる古代中国思想" 岩波書店 2004
7 朱謙之, "老子校釋" 中華書局 1984
8 劉笑敢, "老子古今" 中國社會科學出版社 2006
9 李學勤, "紀念林劍鳴教授史學林文基" 中國社會科學出版社 2002
10 潘悟雲, "漢藏語同源詞研究(一):漢藏語研究的歷史回顧" 廣西民族出版社 2000
11 潘悟雲, "吳閩語中的音韻特徵詞–三等讀入二等的音韻特徵詞" 臺灣學生書局 12 : 2001
12 李承律, "出土文獻資料和中國古代思想史" 2008
13 鄭張尚芳, "上古音系" 上海教育出版社 2003
남송말 지방행정과 添差通判 - 黃震의 廣德軍 添差通判 활동을 중심으로 -
十二運星과 陽順陰逆의 상관성에 대하여 - 사주명리를 중심으로 -
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2027 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2021-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2018-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2015-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2013-06-12 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Oriental Studies | ![]() |
| 2013-03-13 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 동양학연구소 -> 동양학연구원영문명 : Dankook University Institute of Oriental Studies -> Academy of Asian Studies, Dankook University | ![]() |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2001-07-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.68 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.64 | 0.63 | 1.457 | 0.16 |