RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      방광의 요로상피세포종양의 ISUP/WHO등급에 대한 연구 = ISUP/WHO Classification of Papillary Urothelial Neoplasms of Urinary Bladder- Consensus Study Conducted by Korean Society of Urogenital Pathology -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101633259

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background : Pathologic grading, one of the most important prognostic factors of papillary urothelial neoplasia (PUN) of the urinary bladder, has been revised continuously. The current study focused on the analysis of interobserver agreement on PUN of...

      Background : Pathologic grading, one of the most important prognostic factors of papillary
      urothelial neoplasia (PUN) of the urinary bladder, has been revised continuously. The current
      study focused on the analysis of interobserver agreement on PUN of the urinary bladder between
      1973 WHO classification (WHO 1973) and 1998 WHO/ISUP classification. Methods :
      Seventy five cases from 15 institutions were collected, and after review by Korean Society of
      Urogenital Pathology (KSUP), 30 cases were selected as follows; group I, WHO grade 1 and
      papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential by ISUP (7 cases), group II, WHO grade
      2 and low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma (16 cases), and group III, WHO grade 3 and
      high-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma (7 cases). Seventy five general surgical pathologists
      who participated in this study were asked to grade the tumors based on WHO/ISUP classification.
      Interobserver agreement between the participants’ diagnosis and KSUP consensus diagnosis
      was analyzed by kappa value. Results : Interobserver agreement assessed by kappa
      value for all diagnostic groups was very low; for group I, kappa value was -0.900893722; for
      group II, -0.944650025, and for group III, -0.876728996. The overall kappa value of pathology
      residents was better than that of practicing pathologists. Conclusions : The 1998 WHO/
      ISUP classification could not be easily translated from the 1973 WHO classification and because
      of poor interobserver agreement, it appears that further work would be needed before it can
      be practically applied.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "nterobserver discrepancy using the 1998 World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathology classification of urothelial neoplasms:practicalchoices for patient care" 168 : 968-972, 2002

      2 "World Health Organization and International Society ofUrological Pathology classification and two-number grading systemof bladder tumors" 88 : 1509-1512, 2000

      3 "Urothelial papillary(exophytic)neoplasms" 441 : 109-116, 2002

      4 "The reliability and reproducibility of the different classifications of bladder cancer" 2001 : 114-115, 2001

      5 "The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial(transitional cell)neoplasms of the urinary bladder" 22 : 1435-1448, 1998

      6 "The WHO/ISUP 1998 and WHO 1999 systemsfor malignancy grading of bladder cancer. Scientific foundation andtranslation to one another and previous systems" 441 : 105-108, 2002

      7 "Reproducibility of the 1998 World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathology classification of papillary urothelial neoplasms of the urinary bladder" 443 : 734-740, 2003

      8 "Precise microdissection of human bladder carcinomas reveals divergent tumor subclones in the same tumor" 104-110, 2002

      9 "Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential:evolving terminology and concepts" 175 : 1995-2003, 2006

      10 "Noninvasive urothelial neoplasia: WHO classification of noninvasive papillary urothelial tumors In World Health Organization classification of tumors." IARC Press 110-, 2004

      1 "nterobserver discrepancy using the 1998 World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathology classification of urothelial neoplasms:practicalchoices for patient care" 168 : 968-972, 2002

      2 "World Health Organization and International Society ofUrological Pathology classification and two-number grading systemof bladder tumors" 88 : 1509-1512, 2000

      3 "Urothelial papillary(exophytic)neoplasms" 441 : 109-116, 2002

      4 "The reliability and reproducibility of the different classifications of bladder cancer" 2001 : 114-115, 2001

      5 "The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial(transitional cell)neoplasms of the urinary bladder" 22 : 1435-1448, 1998

      6 "The WHO/ISUP 1998 and WHO 1999 systemsfor malignancy grading of bladder cancer. Scientific foundation andtranslation to one another and previous systems" 441 : 105-108, 2002

      7 "Reproducibility of the 1998 World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathology classification of papillary urothelial neoplasms of the urinary bladder" 443 : 734-740, 2003

      8 "Precise microdissection of human bladder carcinomas reveals divergent tumor subclones in the same tumor" 104-110, 2002

      9 "Papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential:evolving terminology and concepts" 175 : 1995-2003, 2006

      10 "Noninvasive urothelial neoplasia: WHO classification of noninvasive papillary urothelial tumors In World Health Organization classification of tumors." IARC Press 110-, 2004

      11 "Natural history of urothelial dysplasia of the bladder" 23 : 443-447, 1999

      12 "Natural history of early bladder cancer" 161 : 31-8, 1992

      13 "Impact of second opinion pathology in the definitive management of patients with bladder carcinoma" 91 : 1284-1290, 2001

      14 "Histological typing of urinarybladder tumors International histological classification of tumors" 1973

      15 "Histological typing of urinary bladder tumors" Springer Verlag 1999

      16 "Histologic grading of papillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder:prognostic value of the 1998 WHO/ISUP classification system and comparison with conventional grading systems" 55 : 900-905, 2002

      17 "Comparison of WHO/ISUP and WHO classification of noninvasive papillary urothelialneoplasms for risk of progression" 60 : 315-319, 2002

      18 "Classification and grading of the non-invasive urothelial neoplasms:recent advances and controversies" 56 : 91-95, 2003

      19 "Cancer heterogeneity and its biologic implications in the grading of urothelial carcinoma" 88 : 1663-1670, 2000

      20 "Biologic differences between noninvasive papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential and low-grade(grade 1)papillary carcinomas of the bladder" 25 : 1528-1533, 2001

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2014-12-24 학술지명변경 한글명 : The Korean Journal of Pathology -> Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Pathology -> Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine
      KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-04-13 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한병리학회지 -> The Korean Journal of Pathology KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.13 0.13 0.12
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.13 0.11 0.409 0.01
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼