RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    A Comparative Study on Safe Harbor and Takedown Notice for Online Service Providers: Focusing on Section 512of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and Chapter 18.10 of the KORUS FTA

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104027729

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Among various legal issues arising from social network services (SNS), copyright infringement is one of the most frequently occurring legal violations. With dissemination of smart-phones, copyright infringement has escalated. Section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and Chapter 18 of the KORUS FTA handle the issue through safe harbor provision and takedown notice clause. Many legal disputes including Viacom v. YouTube have been brought to courts, and majority of the cases are still pending for the courts’decision in the United States. In addition, it is unfortunate that the number of copyright infringement in South Korea has not been decreased as much as expected since the ratification of the KORUS FTA. It is critical for service providers, copyright owners, and the SNS users to understand how safe harbor protection provision and takedown notice clause works. Therefore, this paper attempts to compare similarities and differences of safe harbor provision and takedown clause between the DMCA and KORUS FTA.
    번역하기

    Among various legal issues arising from social network services (SNS), copyright infringement is one of the most frequently occurring legal violations. With dissemination of smart-phones, copyright infringement has escalated. Section 512 of the Digita...

    Among various legal issues arising from social network services (SNS), copyright infringement is one of the most frequently occurring legal violations. With dissemination of smart-phones, copyright infringement has escalated. Section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and Chapter 18 of the KORUS FTA handle the issue through safe harbor provision and takedown notice clause. Many legal disputes including Viacom v. YouTube have been brought to courts, and majority of the cases are still pending for the courts’decision in the United States. In addition, it is unfortunate that the number of copyright infringement in South Korea has not been decreased as much as expected since the ratification of the KORUS FTA. It is critical for service providers, copyright owners, and the SNS users to understand how safe harbor protection provision and takedown notice clause works. Therefore, this paper attempts to compare similarities and differences of safe harbor provision and takedown clause between the DMCA and KORUS FTA.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정재준, "한미 FTA 협정문 제18장 저작권법의 형사정책적 고려" 법학연구소 (54) : 449-484, 2012

    2 신승남, "온라인 서비스 제공자의 미국 저작권법(DMCA)상의 면책 규정과 이에 대한 최신 판례 동향 연구" 법학연구소 17 (17): 303-332, 2013

    3 방석호, "글로벌·디지털 시대의 저작권 문제 - 한미FTA를 중심으로" 한국방송학회 (65) : 7-25, 2007

    4 "www.statista.com"

    5 "www.kookje.co.kr"

    6 "en.wikipedia.org"

    7 "Wolk v. Kodak Imaging Network, Inc., 2011 WL 940056, at*2; 98 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1152 (S.D.N.Y. March 17, 2011)"

    8 Latham & Watkins, "Viacom v. YouTube Safe Harbor Protection Upheld for Online Service Provider" Latham & Watkins Litigation Department 2-, 2013

    9 "Viacom Int’l Inc. v. YouTube, Inc., 676 F.3d 19 (2d Cir. 2012)"

    10 Drayton J., "The Implications of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act on Social Media Sites"

    1 정재준, "한미 FTA 협정문 제18장 저작권법의 형사정책적 고려" 법학연구소 (54) : 449-484, 2012

    2 신승남, "온라인 서비스 제공자의 미국 저작권법(DMCA)상의 면책 규정과 이에 대한 최신 판례 동향 연구" 법학연구소 17 (17): 303-332, 2013

    3 방석호, "글로벌·디지털 시대의 저작권 문제 - 한미FTA를 중심으로" 한국방송학회 (65) : 7-25, 2007

    4 "www.statista.com"

    5 "www.kookje.co.kr"

    6 "en.wikipedia.org"

    7 "Wolk v. Kodak Imaging Network, Inc., 2011 WL 940056, at*2; 98 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1152 (S.D.N.Y. March 17, 2011)"

    8 Latham & Watkins, "Viacom v. YouTube Safe Harbor Protection Upheld for Online Service Provider" Latham & Watkins Litigation Department 2-, 2013

    9 "Viacom Int’l Inc. v. YouTube, Inc., 676 F.3d 19 (2d Cir. 2012)"

    10 Drayton J., "The Implications of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act on Social Media Sites"

    11 "The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998"

    12 "Perfect10, Inc. v. CCBill LLC, 488 F.3d. 1102 (9th Cir. 2007)"

    13 Wilson, B., "Notice, Takedown, and the Good-Faith Standard: How to Protect Internet Users from Bad-Faith Removal of Web Content" 29 : 614-, 2010

    14 "In re Aimster Copyright Litig., 252 F. Supp. 2d 634, 658 (N.D.Ill. 2002)"

    15 "Free Trade Agreement between the Republic of Korea and the United States of America"

    16 Lee, E., "Decoding the DMCA Safe Harbors" 32 (32): 2-, 2009

    17 Westermeier, J.T., "DMCA Section 512(c) “Safe Harbor” Requirements, Strategies, and Risk" 29 (29): 2-, 2012

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.42 0.42 0.4
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.38 0.37 0.482 0.21
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼