RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      동성혼에 관한 미국 판례의 전개 = Issues and Developments of Court Decisions on Same-Sex Marriage in the United States

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100091694

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This article explores the issues and developments of the U.S. court decisions on same-sex marriage, focusing on the major cases decided by the states` highest courts and the U.S. Supreme Court. The courts in the U.S. have shown dramatic changes during the last decades in their attitude towards same-sex marriage and the jurisprudence in interpreting their state and federal constitutions with respect to the right to marriage and the right to equality. This article analyzes the main issues raised and discussed in the U.S. court decisions and finds implications for Korean courts. This article begins with an overview of major court decisions since 1970s to the recent ones, including the U.S. Supreme Court decision in June 2013. Then, it discusses the main issues brought before courts regarding same-sex marriage, by dividing them into three categories. First, it discusses the issues around same-sex marriage itself, the definition of marriage and the right to marriage. They include the debates about the link between marriage and childbirth or child-rearing, marriage as institutional benefits and marriage as a civil right. Second, the article looks into the arguments by opponents of protecting the interests of third parties by banning same-sex marriage and how the U.S. courts have dealt with them. These issues include the freedom to object to same-sex marriage, protection of heterosexual marriage, and the welfare of children. Finally, it explores the issues around the tension between the legislature and the courts and how jurisprudence has developed to protect gay and lesbian people as a social minority group. It then concludes with a discussion on implications of the U.S. experience in the context of Korean jurisprudence.
      번역하기

      This article explores the issues and developments of the U.S. court decisions on same-sex marriage, focusing on the major cases decided by the states` highest courts and the U.S. Supreme Court. The courts in the U.S. have shown dramatic changes during...

      This article explores the issues and developments of the U.S. court decisions on same-sex marriage, focusing on the major cases decided by the states` highest courts and the U.S. Supreme Court. The courts in the U.S. have shown dramatic changes during the last decades in their attitude towards same-sex marriage and the jurisprudence in interpreting their state and federal constitutions with respect to the right to marriage and the right to equality. This article analyzes the main issues raised and discussed in the U.S. court decisions and finds implications for Korean courts. This article begins with an overview of major court decisions since 1970s to the recent ones, including the U.S. Supreme Court decision in June 2013. Then, it discusses the main issues brought before courts regarding same-sex marriage, by dividing them into three categories. First, it discusses the issues around same-sex marriage itself, the definition of marriage and the right to marriage. They include the debates about the link between marriage and childbirth or child-rearing, marriage as institutional benefits and marriage as a civil right. Second, the article looks into the arguments by opponents of protecting the interests of third parties by banning same-sex marriage and how the U.S. courts have dealt with them. These issues include the freedom to object to same-sex marriage, protection of heterosexual marriage, and the welfare of children. Finally, it explores the issues around the tension between the legislature and the courts and how jurisprudence has developed to protect gay and lesbian people as a social minority group. It then concludes with a discussion on implications of the U.S. experience in the context of Korean jurisprudence.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이준일, "헌법상 혼인의 개념 ― 동성간 혼인의 헌법적 허용가능성 ―" 공법연구 37 (3) : 165 ~ 194, 2009

      2 김지혜, "성적지향에 대한 평등권 심사기준과 배제금지원칙 ― 미국 소수자 평등보호 법리의 한국적 함의 ―" 헌법학연구 19 (3) : 199 ~ 234, 2013

      3 조홍석, "새로운 형태의 가족: 헌법적 가능성과 한계" 공법학연구 8 (4) : 221 ~ 242, 2007

      4 박승호, "미국헌법상 동성애자의 권리 —Romer 사건과 Lawrence 사건 검토를 중심으로—" 미국헌법연구 22 (2) : 203 ~ 242, 2011

      5 김지혜, "동성혼과 평등권 심사기준:미국 연방대법원 ‘결혼보호법(DOMA)’위헌 판결을 중심으로" 제129회 헌법실무연구회 월례발표회, 2013

      6 류민희, "동성결합의 법적 쟁점과 제도화 가능성" 제2회 SOGI콜로키움 자료집, 2013

      7 Daniel Farber, "The Pariah Principle" Constitutional Commentary 13 : 257 ~, 1996

      8 Kenji Yoshino, "The Paradox of Political Power : Same-Sex Marriage and the Supreme Court" Utah Law Review 2012 : 527 ~, 2012

      9 Erwin Chemerinsky, "Constitutional Law : Principles and Policies" Aspen Publishers, 2011

      10 William N.Eskridge,Jr, "Comparative Law and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate : A Step-by-Step Approach Toward State Recognition" McGeorge Law Review 31 : 641 ~, 2000

      1 이준일, "헌법상 혼인의 개념 ― 동성간 혼인의 헌법적 허용가능성 ―" 공법연구 37 (3) : 165 ~ 194, 2009

      2 김지혜, "성적지향에 대한 평등권 심사기준과 배제금지원칙 ― 미국 소수자 평등보호 법리의 한국적 함의 ―" 헌법학연구 19 (3) : 199 ~ 234, 2013

      3 조홍석, "새로운 형태의 가족: 헌법적 가능성과 한계" 공법학연구 8 (4) : 221 ~ 242, 2007

      4 박승호, "미국헌법상 동성애자의 권리 —Romer 사건과 Lawrence 사건 검토를 중심으로—" 미국헌법연구 22 (2) : 203 ~ 242, 2011

      5 김지혜, "동성혼과 평등권 심사기준:미국 연방대법원 ‘결혼보호법(DOMA)’위헌 판결을 중심으로" 제129회 헌법실무연구회 월례발표회, 2013

      6 류민희, "동성결합의 법적 쟁점과 제도화 가능성" 제2회 SOGI콜로키움 자료집, 2013

      7 Daniel Farber, "The Pariah Principle" Constitutional Commentary 13 : 257 ~, 1996

      8 Kenji Yoshino, "The Paradox of Political Power : Same-Sex Marriage and the Supreme Court" Utah Law Review 2012 : 527 ~, 2012

      9 Erwin Chemerinsky, "Constitutional Law : Principles and Policies" Aspen Publishers, 2011

      10 William N.Eskridge,Jr, "Comparative Law and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate : A Step-by-Step Approach Toward State Recognition" McGeorge Law Review 31 : 641 ~, 2000

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼