냉전 이데올로기의 구조화와 내셔널 아이덴티티의 형성의 상관관계: 한일비교 = The Correlation between Structuralization of Cold War Ideology and Formation of National Identities: Korea and Japan

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article aims to analyze the impact of Cold War ideology on the formation of national identities in South Korea and Japan, and then trace the reconstruction process of Cold War realities in Northeast Asia. The structuralization processes of Cold War ideology in the two countries were very different; the results, too, were very different. While ‘bulwark against communism’ primarily became South Korea’s self-image, a fairly large segment of the Japanese citizenry accepted pacifism as an integral part of their national identity despite their actual situation as a logistic base for the South Korean bulwark.
Geopolitical and other situational factors may well account for the divergence. But we should pay attention to the fact that each of the two countries constructed an inter-subjective reality of its own. South Korea, as a staunch anticommunist state, appropriated the Cold War exigency and volatilized it in dealing with a host of issues. Japan, on the other hand, tended to mitigate the tensions of the Cold War by invoking pacifist ideals.
In recent years, especially since the North-South Korea Summit of 2000, South Korea’s national identity has been moving from anticommunism to pacifism. By contrast, amid the rising tide of anti-North Koreanism (and anticommunism) since the Japan-North Korea Summit of 2002, Japan has shown less and less pacifism. This contrast means that there had been two different Cold War realities in Northeast Asia in the past.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article aims to analyze the impact of Cold War ideology on the formation of national identities in South Korea and Japan, and then trace the reconstruction process of Cold War realities in Northeast Asia. The structuralization processes of Cold War ideology in the two countries were very different; the results, too, were very different. While ‘bulwark against communism’ primarily became South Korea’s self-image, a fairly large segment of the Japanese citizenry accepted pacifism as an integral part of their national identity despite their actual situation as a logistic base for the South Korean bulwark.
Geopolitical and other situational factors may well account for the divergence. But we should pay attention to the fact that each of the two countries constructed an inter-subjective reality of its own. South Korea, as a staunch anticommunist state, appropriated the Cold War exigency and volatilized it in dealing with a host of issues. Japan, on the other hand, tended to mitigate the tensions of the Cold War by invoking pacifist ideals.
In recent years, especially since the North-South Korea Summit of 2000, South Korea’s national identity has been moving from anticommunism to pacifism. By contrast, amid the rising tide of anti-North Koreanism (and anticommunism) since the Japan-North Korea Summit of 2002, Japan has shown less and less pacifism. This contrast means that there had been two different Cold War realities in Northeast Asia in the past.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 古関彰一, "｢平和国家｣日本の再検討" 岩波書店 126-128, 2002

2 김영미, "해방 이후 주민등록제도의 변천과 그 성격 ―한국 주민등록증의 역사적 연원―" 한국사연구회 (136) : 287-323, 2007

3 이원덕, "한일과거사 처리의 원점: 일본의 전후처리 외교와 한일회담" 서울대학교 출판부 105-115, 1996

4 남기정, "한미지위협정체결의 정치과정 in: 한미동맹 50년: 법적쟁점과 미래의 전망" 백산서당 2004

5 손호철, "한국현대정치: 이론과 역사, 1945-2003" 사회평론 2004

6 "한국정부 외교문서, J-0002, 741.14, 232, 0096-0210, ｢주한미군이 사용중인 토지, 건물 및 시설에 관한 한미간의 협정안 기초 및 검토자료｣ 0104-0105"

7 박명림, "한국전쟁의 발발과 기원 II: 기원과 원인" 나남 140-, 1996

8 남기정, "한국전쟁과 일본: 기지국가의 전쟁과 평화" 고려대학교 평화연구소 9 : 2000

9 "한국일보 2004년 10월 13일자"

10 "한국일보 1986년 10월 14일자"

11 박찬표, "한국의 국가형성과 민주주의: 냉전 자유주의와 보수적 민주주의의 기원" 후마니타스 185-, 2007

12 서중석, "한국에서의 민족문제와 국가: 부르주아층 또는 지배층을 중심으로 in: 근대 국민국가와 민족문제" 지식산업사 126-127, 1995

13 최용호, "한국군 베트남파병과 박정희 in: 박정희시대 연구의 쟁점과 과제" 선인 372-, 2005

14 "한겨레 신문 2005년 10월 18일자"

15 김정훈, "지배담론으로서의 반공주의와 그 변화 in: 한국의 정치사회적 지배담론과 민주주의 동학" 함께읽는책 2003

16 "조선일보 2005년 7월 17일자"

17 강성현, "전향에서 감시 동원, 그리고 학살로: ‘국민보도연맹’ 조직을 중심으로" 선인 14 : 87-, 2004

18 서중석, "일제시기 국내 공산주의자들의 혁명노선의 성격" (7) : 32-37, 1991

19 남기정, "일본 ‘전후 평화주의’의 원류―전후적 의의와 태생적 한계―" 일본연구소 24 (24): 255-276, 2008

20 서중석, "이승만의 정치이데올로기" 역사비평사 235-236, 2005

21 양우정, "이승만 독립노선의 승리" 독립정신보급회 103-104, 1948

22 데이비드 맥렐런, "이데올로기와 담론 in: 이데올로기" 이후 194-195, 2002

23 김득중, "여순사건과 이승만정권의 반공이데올로기 공세" 선인 14 : 2004

24 전재호, "세계화 정보화 시대 한국의 정치적 정체성 변화: 반공의식을 중심으로 in: 세계화, 정보화, 남북한: 남북한의 국가-시민사회와 정체성" 이매진 2007

25 윤충로, "베트남과 한국의 반공독재국가 형성사" 선인 514-, 2005

26 장문석, "민족주의 길들이기" 지식의 풍경 200-, 2007

27 홍석률, "대한민국 60년의 안과 밖, 그리고 정체성" 창비 36 (36): 56-, 2008

28 송건호, "김구"

29 박원순, "국가보안법 연구 1" 역사비평사 44-, 1989

30 연정은, "감시에서 동원으로, 동원에서 규율로: 1950년대 학도호국단을 중심으로" 선인 14 : 206-212, 2004

31 基地問題調査委員会, "軍事基地の実態と分析" 三一書房 27-, 1954

32 川西正鑑, "東亜地政治学の構想" 実業之日本社 321-356, 1942

33 外務省アジア局第2課, "朝鮮政治会議を控えての国際情勢─我々として注意すべき点" 0148-0166, 1953

34 木村禧八郎他, "朝鮮戦争と日本経済の軍事化 in: 講和からMSAへ" 岩波書店 1953

35 外務省アジア局第2課, "朝鮮に関する高級政治会議の見通しについて─デリケートなバランス"

36 伊藤剛, "日越国交正常化と日米関係─東アジア国際システムの多極化と日本外交 in: 危機の日本外交─70年代(年報·政治学)" 岩波書店 64-73, 1997

37 五十嵐武士, "日米関係と東アジア─歴史的文脈と未来の構想" 東京大学出版会 151-, 1999

38 池田十吾, "戦後日米関係における日本外交のアイデンティティ in: 日本外交のアイデンティティ" 南窓社 195-197, 2004

39 赤沢史朗, "戦後思想と文化 in: 占領と戦後改革" 吉川弘文館 1994

40 丸山真男, "戦中と戦後の間, 1936-1957" みすず書房 516-517, 1976

41 平野義太郎他, "平和運動 in: 日本資本主義講座─軍国主義の復活" 岩波書店 1954

42 宮原誠一, "平和教育の動向 in: 日本資本主義講座─軍国主義の復活" 岩波書店 448-452, 1954

43 申旭熙, "冷戦期日米同盟の政治経済, 1954-1960─日本の役割 in: 市場·国家·国際体制" 慶応義塾大学出版会 2001

44 水谷三公, "丸山真男─ある時代の肖像" ちくま新書 2004

45 古矢旬, "アメリカニズム─｢普遍国家｣のナショナリズム" 東京大学出版会 227-, 2002

46 マイケル·ケニー, "アイデンティティの政治" 日本経済評論社 16-, 2005

47 Shiraishi Masaya, "apanese Relations with Vietnam: 1951-1987," Cornell Southeast Asia Program 38-39, 1990

48 Alexander Wendt, "The agent-structure problem in international relations theory" 41 (41): 1987

49 Akihiko Tanaka, "The New Middle Ages" Tokyo: The International House of Japan 1-21, 2002

50 Robert J. Smith, "Japanese Society: Tradition, Self and the Social Order" Cambridge:Cambridge University Press 131-, 1985

51 이경민, "FTA는 승공의 지름길이다" 174-175, 2006

52 Peter J. Katzenstein, "Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Postwar Japan in: 文化と国防─戦後日本の警察と軍隊" 日本経済評論社 2007

53 Victor D. Cha, "Alignment Despite Antagonism: The US-Korea-Japan Security Triangle" Stanford University Press 1999

54 김학재, "1950년대 국가권력과 행정말단기구: 국민반을 통한 감시와 동원" 14 : 2004