RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      미국의 역외군사시설에 관한 환경보호법제 = 기지반환에 따른 제문제와 관련하여

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82685076

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Korean and the U.S. governments have been discussing on details surrounding the returns of the U.S. military bases since May 2005. However, the discussion is at a deadlock due to conflicting opinions between parties. Korean delegation argues that the U.S. Forces in Korea should burden to delete polluting factors in accordance with the ‘polluters pay principle’ and the ‘Tab A to the Joint Environmental Information Exchange and Access Procedures’ in 2003. However, based upon the provisions in the ‘Memorandum of Special Understandings on Environmental Protection’(hereinafter the ‘Special Understandings’), the U.S. delegation disagrees on the opinion of Korean delegation. In other words, under the Special Understandings, the U.S. Forces in Korea is responsible only when there is a clear and present danger to human health, and it is difficult to find such an eminent danger in the present issues.
      In particular, this article examined the U.S. laws, and the author concluded that the U.S. laws can apply unfavorably to hosting countries due to the lack of concreteness of the related legal standards. In addition, the passive attitude of the U.S. government on environmental harms by U.S. forces in foreign countries to minimize the environmental recovery payment is one of the reasons of spreading environmental conflicts between the U.S. forces and hosting countries.
      번역하기

      Korean and the U.S. governments have been discussing on details surrounding the returns of the U.S. military bases since May 2005. However, the discussion is at a deadlock due to conflicting opinions between parties. Korean delegation argues that the ...

      Korean and the U.S. governments have been discussing on details surrounding the returns of the U.S. military bases since May 2005. However, the discussion is at a deadlock due to conflicting opinions between parties. Korean delegation argues that the U.S. Forces in Korea should burden to delete polluting factors in accordance with the ‘polluters pay principle’ and the ‘Tab A to the Joint Environmental Information Exchange and Access Procedures’ in 2003. However, based upon the provisions in the ‘Memorandum of Special Understandings on Environmental Protection’(hereinafter the ‘Special Understandings’), the U.S. delegation disagrees on the opinion of Korean delegation. In other words, under the Special Understandings, the U.S. Forces in Korea is responsible only when there is a clear and present danger to human health, and it is difficult to find such an eminent danger in the present issues.
      In particular, this article examined the U.S. laws, and the author concluded that the U.S. laws can apply unfavorably to hosting countries due to the lack of concreteness of the related legal standards. In addition, the passive attitude of the U.S. government on environmental harms by U.S. forces in foreign countries to minimize the environmental recovery payment is one of the reasons of spreading environmental conflicts between the U.S. forces and hosting countries.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
      • Ⅱ. 미국의 군사시설에 대한 환경보호기준의 법적근거
      • Ⅲ. 역외군사시설에 대한 환경보호정책
      • Ⅳ. 맺는 말
      • 【참고문헌】
      • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
      • Ⅱ. 미국의 군사시설에 대한 환경보호기준의 법적근거
      • Ⅲ. 역외군사시설에 대한 환경보호정책
      • Ⅳ. 맺는 말
      • 【참고문헌】
      • 【Abstract】
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼