RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재 SCOPUS

    세무조정자료의 분석을 통해 살펴본 우리나라 기업의 재무이익과 세무이익의 차이 = Book-Tax Difference of Korean Firms Examined Using Actual Tax-Reconciliation Data

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A95939400

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study has descriptively explored the characteristics of the book-tax difference of Korean companies (BTD henceforth) over the period of 1993 through 2002. Specifically, this study has examined some static natures and dynamic trends of BTD and reconciling tax adjustments, using the real tax reconciliation data. A Korean corporation needs to reconcile its book income (i.e., income reported in the income statement) to arrive at the taxable income. This reconciliation consists of additions and deductions that need to be made due to various timing and permanent differences. Unlike in the U.S., this reconciliation data is publicly available in Korea in the statement of corporate income tax which is contained in the Business Report filed with the Financial Fiduciary Service (equivalent to the SEC in the U.S.) and in a tax footnote of audited financial statements. As far as the authors know, there has been no prior research in Korea which has conducted in-depth studies of tax recon- ciliations per se that cause the difference between book and tax incomes. This study will thus serve as a foundation study regarding BTD, and is expected to provide useful implications for future empirical research in this area. Major results of this study are summarized in what follows. First, Tables 2, 3 and 5 present descriptive statistics of additions, deductions and BTD on an annual basis. According to Table 2, over the 10 year period the adding amount ranges from ₩18.7 to ₩130.5 billion per firm. The 10-year average is ₩69.2 billion. In each year, the average far exceeds the median implying that a few companies have inordinately large adding amounts while most firms have relatively small amounts (the distribution is skewed to the right). Table 3 shows that the 10-year average deduction amounts to ₩61.8 billion, which is lower than the average addition by ₩7.4 billion. As in the case of the additions, the distribution of the deductions is skewed to the right and the time-series pattern of deductions resembles that of the additions. According to Table 5, the average BTD amounts to -₩7.4 billion, and each year reports a negative BTD as well except in the year of 1994. Further, it is observed that as compared to the 1993-1997 period, the BTD tends to increase (in absolute amounts) in the subsequent years (1998-2002). This is due to the fact that while in the latter sample period both additions and deductions rise, the increase in the additions outweighs the increase in the deductions. That the BTD of Korean companies is negative on average is in contrast to U.S. corporations showing positive BTD overall. The negative BTD of Korean corporations has been persistently observed in most years of the entire sample period. Panel 1 of Table 7 demonstrates that the mean BTD is significantly below zero in eight out of the ten years observed, while the median BTD is negative in each of the ten years. This phenomenon is prevalent regardless of firm size and industry. In Panel 2 of Table 7, the entire sample is divided into two groups according to size; small and large firms. The mean BTD of each group turns out to be negative for more than seven of the years. Panel 4 of Table 7 breaks down the sample into seven groups based on the industry code (light manufacturing, heavy manufacturing, information technology, construction, retail and wholesale, transportation, and miscellaneous). It is shown that in each industry both the mean and the median BTD are significantly negative. However, when the sample firms are divided into profit and loss firms, loss firms are more likely to have negative BTD than profit firms. Panel 3 of Table 7 reveals that profit firms have negative mean BTD for three years and negative median BTD for five years only, whereas loss firms show negative mean and median BTD in every year. This result seems to be related to differing incentives for earnings management between the two groups. It seems to be the case that profit firms may recognize income-increasing accounting accruals, most of which are deducted in the process of determining tax income. In contrast, loss firms may wish to take a ``big bath`` to boost future book incomes, and these income-decreasing accruals may need to be added back to determine tax income. A further study needs to be conducted to examine this possibility. The third major result of this study concerns the dynamic trend of BTD. The magnitude of BTD in the earlier period(1993-1996) fluctuated in a relatively stable fashion, but had increased substantially (in absolute amounts) in the later period(1997-2002). This study has found that such a time-series pattern of BTD was due to the increased discrepancy between the Korean tax rules and GAAP, which has accommodated IFRS(International Financial Reporting Standards) on a large scale since the Korean economic crisis of 1997. This finding enables us to predict the future trend of tax reconciliations and BTD. Since its inception, the KASB(Korean Accounting Standards Board) has made a great deal of effort to enhance the conformity of the Korean GAAP to IFRS. This massive effort of the KASB will extend into the foreseeable future, and will thus result in further adoption of fair value accounting, which differs considerably from the valuation rules for assets and liabilities in the Korean tax rules. Further, new GAAP such as pension accounting are waiting to be incorporated into Korean GAAP. All of these changes would further magnify the discrepancy between the Korean tax rules and GAAP, and will therefore increase the magnitude of tax reconciliations and consequently BTD in the future, as far as Korea maintains the positive system of tax law.
    번역하기

    This study has descriptively explored the characteristics of the book-tax difference of Korean companies (BTD henceforth) over the period of 1993 through 2002. Specifically, this study has examined some static natures and dynamic trends of BTD and rec...

    This study has descriptively explored the characteristics of the book-tax difference of Korean companies (BTD henceforth) over the period of 1993 through 2002. Specifically, this study has examined some static natures and dynamic trends of BTD and reconciling tax adjustments, using the real tax reconciliation data. A Korean corporation needs to reconcile its book income (i.e., income reported in the income statement) to arrive at the taxable income. This reconciliation consists of additions and deductions that need to be made due to various timing and permanent differences. Unlike in the U.S., this reconciliation data is publicly available in Korea in the statement of corporate income tax which is contained in the Business Report filed with the Financial Fiduciary Service (equivalent to the SEC in the U.S.) and in a tax footnote of audited financial statements. As far as the authors know, there has been no prior research in Korea which has conducted in-depth studies of tax recon- ciliations per se that cause the difference between book and tax incomes. This study will thus serve as a foundation study regarding BTD, and is expected to provide useful implications for future empirical research in this area. Major results of this study are summarized in what follows. First, Tables 2, 3 and 5 present descriptive statistics of additions, deductions and BTD on an annual basis. According to Table 2, over the 10 year period the adding amount ranges from ₩18.7 to ₩130.5 billion per firm. The 10-year average is ₩69.2 billion. In each year, the average far exceeds the median implying that a few companies have inordinately large adding amounts while most firms have relatively small amounts (the distribution is skewed to the right). Table 3 shows that the 10-year average deduction amounts to ₩61.8 billion, which is lower than the average addition by ₩7.4 billion. As in the case of the additions, the distribution of the deductions is skewed to the right and the time-series pattern of deductions resembles that of the additions. According to Table 5, the average BTD amounts to -₩7.4 billion, and each year reports a negative BTD as well except in the year of 1994. Further, it is observed that as compared to the 1993-1997 period, the BTD tends to increase (in absolute amounts) in the subsequent years (1998-2002). This is due to the fact that while in the latter sample period both additions and deductions rise, the increase in the additions outweighs the increase in the deductions. That the BTD of Korean companies is negative on average is in contrast to U.S. corporations showing positive BTD overall. The negative BTD of Korean corporations has been persistently observed in most years of the entire sample period. Panel 1 of Table 7 demonstrates that the mean BTD is significantly below zero in eight out of the ten years observed, while the median BTD is negative in each of the ten years. This phenomenon is prevalent regardless of firm size and industry. In Panel 2 of Table 7, the entire sample is divided into two groups according to size; small and large firms. The mean BTD of each group turns out to be negative for more than seven of the years. Panel 4 of Table 7 breaks down the sample into seven groups based on the industry code (light manufacturing, heavy manufacturing, information technology, construction, retail and wholesale, transportation, and miscellaneous). It is shown that in each industry both the mean and the median BTD are significantly negative. However, when the sample firms are divided into profit and loss firms, loss firms are more likely to have negative BTD than profit firms. Panel 3 of Table 7 reveals that profit firms have negative mean BTD for three years and negative median BTD for five years only, whereas loss firms show negative mean and median BTD in every year. This result seems to be related to differing incentives for earnings management between the two groups. It seems to be the case that profit firms may recognize income-increasing accounting accruals, most of which are deducted in the process of determining tax income. In contrast, loss firms may wish to take a ``big bath`` to boost future book incomes, and these income-decreasing accruals may need to be added back to determine tax income. A further study needs to be conducted to examine this possibility. The third major result of this study concerns the dynamic trend of BTD. The magnitude of BTD in the earlier period(1993-1996) fluctuated in a relatively stable fashion, but had increased substantially (in absolute amounts) in the later period(1997-2002). This study has found that such a time-series pattern of BTD was due to the increased discrepancy between the Korean tax rules and GAAP, which has accommodated IFRS(International Financial Reporting Standards) on a large scale since the Korean economic crisis of 1997. This finding enables us to predict the future trend of tax reconciliations and BTD. Since its inception, the KASB(Korean Accounting Standards Board) has made a great deal of effort to enhance the conformity of the Korean GAAP to IFRS. This massive effort of the KASB will extend into the foreseeable future, and will thus result in further adoption of fair value accounting, which differs considerably from the valuation rules for assets and liabilities in the Korean tax rules. Further, new GAAP such as pension accounting are waiting to be incorporated into Korean GAAP. All of these changes would further magnify the discrepancy between the Korean tax rules and GAAP, and will therefore increase the magnitude of tax reconciliations and consequently BTD in the future, as far as Korea maintains the positive system of tax law.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 전규안, "조세비용과 비조세비용의 상충관계가 재무보고이익과 세무보고이익의 차이에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 29 (29): 29-56, 2004

    2 고종권, "재무보고이익-세무보고이익의 차이와 이익, 현금흐름 및 발생액의 지속성과 자본시장의 반응" 한국회계학회 31 (31): 127-162, 2006

    3 주인기, "이익조정 행위의 측정치로서 회계이익과 과세소득 차이의 유용성에 관한 연구" 한국회계학회 30 (30): 237-275, 2005

    4 박종일, "세금비용과 이익조정이 회계이익과 과세소득의 차이에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 27 (27): 81-116, 2002

    5 고종권, "세금비용과 비세금비용이 재무보고이익과 세무보고이익의 차이에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 75-104, 2003

    6 신현걸, "상장법인의 세무조정 현황 실증분석" 한국세무학회 19 (19): 7-194, 2002

    7 김권중, "경상이익 구성요소와 특별손익의 지속성과 주가관련성" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 55-84, 2003

    8 박종일, "거래소와 코스닥기업의 회계이익과 과세소득의 차이 및 기업지배구조 비교분석" 한국경영학회 32 (32): 1-378, 2003

    9 Hanlon, M, "What Can We Infer About a Firm's Taxable Income from its Financial Statements?" 56 (56): 831-863, 2003

    10 Mills, L, "Trends in Book-Tax Income and Balance Sheet Differences" (19) : 1109-1124, 2002

    1 전규안, "조세비용과 비조세비용의 상충관계가 재무보고이익과 세무보고이익의 차이에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 29 (29): 29-56, 2004

    2 고종권, "재무보고이익-세무보고이익의 차이와 이익, 현금흐름 및 발생액의 지속성과 자본시장의 반응" 한국회계학회 31 (31): 127-162, 2006

    3 주인기, "이익조정 행위의 측정치로서 회계이익과 과세소득 차이의 유용성에 관한 연구" 한국회계학회 30 (30): 237-275, 2005

    4 박종일, "세금비용과 이익조정이 회계이익과 과세소득의 차이에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 27 (27): 81-116, 2002

    5 고종권, "세금비용과 비세금비용이 재무보고이익과 세무보고이익의 차이에 미치는 영향" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 75-104, 2003

    6 신현걸, "상장법인의 세무조정 현황 실증분석" 한국세무학회 19 (19): 7-194, 2002

    7 김권중, "경상이익 구성요소와 특별손익의 지속성과 주가관련성" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 55-84, 2003

    8 박종일, "거래소와 코스닥기업의 회계이익과 과세소득의 차이 및 기업지배구조 비교분석" 한국경영학회 32 (32): 1-378, 2003

    9 Hanlon, M, "What Can We Infer About a Firm's Taxable Income from its Financial Statements?" 56 (56): 831-863, 2003

    10 Mills, L, "Trends in Book-Tax Income and Balance Sheet Differences" (19) : 1109-1124, 2002

    11 Chaney, P. K, "The effect of deferred taxes on security prices" 9 (9): 91-116, 1994

    12 Manzon, G, "The Relation between Financial and Tax Reporting measures of income" (55) : 175-214, 2002

    13 U.S. Department of Treasury, "The Problem of Corporate Tax Shelters: Discussion, Analysis and Legislative Proposals." July Washington D.C.: Governmental Printing Offices. 1999

    14 "The Persistence and Pricing of Earnings, Accruals and Cash Flows When Firms Have Large Book-Tax Difference." 80 (80): 137-166, 2005

    15 Mills, L. F, "The Influence of Tax and Nontax Costs on Book-Tax Reporting Differences: Public and Private Firms" 23 (23): 1-19, 2001

    16 Desai, M, "The Divergence between Book income and Tax income" 169-206, 2003

    17 Lev, B., and D. Nissim, "Taxable income, future earnings, and equity values" 79 (79): 1039-1074, 2004

    18 Plesko, G. A, "Reconciling Corporation Book and Tax Net Income, Tax Years 1996-1998" 21 (21): 1-16, 2002

    19 Lenter, D, "Public Disclosure of Corporate Tax Return Information: Accounting, Economics, and Legal Perspectives" 56 (56): 803-830, 2003

    20 McGill, G. A, "Lost in Translation: Detecting Tax Shelter Activity in Financial Statement" 57 (57): 739-756, 2004

    21 Penman, S, "Financial statement analysis and security valuation." McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York. 2001

    22 Revsine, L, "Financial reporting and analysi" Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ 1999

    23 Guenther, D, "Financial Reporting, Tax Costs, and Book-Tax Conformity" (23) : 225-248, 1997

    24 Kelley, S., "Evidence on the Possible Information Loss of Conforming Book Income and Taxable Income. Working paper" University of Michigan and University of Washington. 2005

    25 Phillips, J, "Earning Management: New Evidence Based on Deferrred Tax Expense" 78 (78): 491-521, 2003

    26 Krishnan, G., "Do Auditors Use the Information in Book-Tax Differences?. Working paper" University of Michigan and George Mason University. 2005

    27 Choi, Jong-Seo, "Detecting Earnings Management Using Deferred Tax Metrics" (30) : 93-132, 2005

    28 "Corporate Tax Avoidance and the Properties of Corporate Earnings" 57 (57): 729-737, 2004

    29 Heltzer, W, "Conservatism and Book-Tax Differences. Working paper" University of Chicago 2006

    30 Palepu, K, "Business analysis and valuation using financial statements" outh-Western College Publishing. Cincinnati, Ohio 2000

    31 Mills, L, "Bridging the Reporting Gap: A Proposal for More Informative Reconciling of Book and Tax Income" 56 (56): 865-893, 2003

    32 Weber, D, "Book-Tax Differences, Analysts’ Forecast Errors, and Stock Returns. Dissertation. University of Colorado" 2005

    33 Shevlin, T., "Book-Tax Conformity for Corporate Income: An Introduction to the Issues. Working paper" University of Michigan and University of Washington 2004

    34 Heflin, F, "Book versus Taxable Income. Working paper" Northwestern University and Purdue University 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.96 1.96 2.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.65 2.74 5.829 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼