RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    일본의 전자파 규제법제와 관련 분쟁사례 분석 = Regulations and Legal Dispute related to the Electromagnetic Fields in Japan

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100096171

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    We are usually exposed to a lot of electromagnetic fields not only in electronic products such as TV, radio, cellular phones but also in diverse fields such as X-ray pictures or radioactive treatment etc. The fact that these electromagnetic fields can be harmful to human body now belongs to the common sense more or less to us. Of course, if we have obvious scientific supporting evidences or research results regarding the harmfulness of electromagnetic fields, we shall be able to open the possibility of the concrete relief or the regulation means to protect us from the harmfulness. However, in reality, it is difficult to search for the obvious scientific evidences as to the harmfulness of electromagnetic fields, and just only the possibility of danger is suggested. In these situations, the necessity is recognized to study the case of the disputes over the damages to the environment or health owing to electromagnetic fields in japan. So in this thesis we reviewed dispute cases and precedents related to the electromagnetic fields in Japan where the issues owing to electromagnetic fields have been recognized socially and the disputes therefrom have been experienced several times rather than in Korea. As the result of study, we could not confirm the precedent which accepted the request of construction prohibition, the request of withdrawal·transfer, the request of operation prohibition for the reason of health damages owing to electromagnetic fields related to power cables or mobile phone base stations in Japan. The biggest cause is in that the court doesn’t acknowledge concrete danger, high-degree probability, that is, the scientific cause and effect relationship between the exposure of electromagnetic fields and the damages thereby regarding the evidence as to the worry of health damage by electromagnetic fields the plaintiff submitted. At length, the portion to be confirmed through Japanese dispute cases and precedents means that the relief itself of the damages owing to electromagnetic fields is extremely difficult within the frame of previous judicial relief system. Therefore, as most of the countries don’t focus on the relief of the damages in the environmental health owing to the exposure of electromagnetic fields but they emphasize the prevention thereby and management, and a continuous research and development for the prevention of the damages, so it is important for us to establish the regulation standard by public law for the prevention of damage occurrence or management. Of course, we shall continue the study to verify the scientific cause and effect relationship between the exposure of electromagnetic fields and the damages therefrom.
    번역하기

    We are usually exposed to a lot of electromagnetic fields not only in electronic products such as TV, radio, cellular phones but also in diverse fields such as X-ray pictures or radioactive treatment etc. The fact that these electromagnetic fields can...

    We are usually exposed to a lot of electromagnetic fields not only in electronic products such as TV, radio, cellular phones but also in diverse fields such as X-ray pictures or radioactive treatment etc. The fact that these electromagnetic fields can be harmful to human body now belongs to the common sense more or less to us. Of course, if we have obvious scientific supporting evidences or research results regarding the harmfulness of electromagnetic fields, we shall be able to open the possibility of the concrete relief or the regulation means to protect us from the harmfulness. However, in reality, it is difficult to search for the obvious scientific evidences as to the harmfulness of electromagnetic fields, and just only the possibility of danger is suggested. In these situations, the necessity is recognized to study the case of the disputes over the damages to the environment or health owing to electromagnetic fields in japan. So in this thesis we reviewed dispute cases and precedents related to the electromagnetic fields in Japan where the issues owing to electromagnetic fields have been recognized socially and the disputes therefrom have been experienced several times rather than in Korea. As the result of study, we could not confirm the precedent which accepted the request of construction prohibition, the request of withdrawal·transfer, the request of operation prohibition for the reason of health damages owing to electromagnetic fields related to power cables or mobile phone base stations in Japan. The biggest cause is in that the court doesn’t acknowledge concrete danger, high-degree probability, that is, the scientific cause and effect relationship between the exposure of electromagnetic fields and the damages thereby regarding the evidence as to the worry of health damage by electromagnetic fields the plaintiff submitted. At length, the portion to be confirmed through Japanese dispute cases and precedents means that the relief itself of the damages owing to electromagnetic fields is extremely difficult within the frame of previous judicial relief system. Therefore, as most of the countries don’t focus on the relief of the damages in the environmental health owing to the exposure of electromagnetic fields but they emphasize the prevention thereby and management, and a continuous research and development for the prevention of the damages, so it is important for us to establish the regulation standard by public law for the prevention of damage occurrence or management. Of course, we shall continue the study to verify the scientific cause and effect relationship between the exposure of electromagnetic fields and the damages therefrom.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이종영, "전자파의 위험가능성에 관한 법적문제" 24 (24): 1996

    2 김상태, "전자파로 인한 신체적 손해배상에 관한 법리 -미국에서의 논의를 중심으로-" 한양법학회 23 (23): 37-65, 2012

    3 박종원, "전자파 분쟁 해소를 위한 환경법의 역할, 미래·융합법제 연구보고서" 법제처 2013

    4 김은주, "송전탑 건설을 중심으로 한 전자파 분쟁의 현황과 법적 과제" 한국토지공법학회 40 : 293-315, 2008

    5 박종원, "송전선로 건설에 따른 전자파 분쟁과 환경법의 역할" 한국환경법학회 35 (35): 241-274, 2013

    6 김현수, "미국법상 전자파에 의한 손해와 불법행위책임" 법학연구소 5 (5): 209-230, 2012

    7 이준서, "독일의 전자파 관리법제의 동향" 한국법제연구원 2011

    8 이종태, "대기오염의 건강 영향 평가를 위한 역학연구 설계 및 방법론" 34 (34): 2001

    9 김민규, "경관이익의 침해와 불법행위책임법의 만남" 한국토지법학회 27 (27): 117-140, 2011

    10 이상욱, "경관이익의 법적 보호에 관한 연구- 일본에서의 학설과 판례를 참조하여 -" 한국비교사법학회 13 (13): 403-426, 2006

    1 이종영, "전자파의 위험가능성에 관한 법적문제" 24 (24): 1996

    2 김상태, "전자파로 인한 신체적 손해배상에 관한 법리 -미국에서의 논의를 중심으로-" 한양법학회 23 (23): 37-65, 2012

    3 박종원, "전자파 분쟁 해소를 위한 환경법의 역할, 미래·융합법제 연구보고서" 법제처 2013

    4 김은주, "송전탑 건설을 중심으로 한 전자파 분쟁의 현황과 법적 과제" 한국토지공법학회 40 : 293-315, 2008

    5 박종원, "송전선로 건설에 따른 전자파 분쟁과 환경법의 역할" 한국환경법학회 35 (35): 241-274, 2013

    6 김현수, "미국법상 전자파에 의한 손해와 불법행위책임" 법학연구소 5 (5): 209-230, 2012

    7 이준서, "독일의 전자파 관리법제의 동향" 한국법제연구원 2011

    8 이종태, "대기오염의 건강 영향 평가를 위한 역학연구 설계 및 방법론" 34 (34): 2001

    9 김민규, "경관이익의 침해와 불법행위책임법의 만남" 한국토지법학회 27 (27): 117-140, 2011

    10 이상욱, "경관이익의 법적 보호에 관한 연구- 일본에서의 학설과 판례를 참조하여 -" 한국비교사법학회 13 (13): 403-426, 2006

    11 永野秀雄, "電磁波訴訟の判例と理論" 三和書籍 2008

    12 鈴木美惠子, "電磁波被曝で7つの腫瘍勞動基準局に再審査請求" (223) : 2010

    13 清瀬信次郎, "眺望権論" 19 (19): 1985

    14 大塚直, "環境法" 有斐閣 2006

    15 星野英一, "現代社会と民法学の動向(上)" 有斐閣 1992

    16 吉川日出男, "民法学と比較法学の諸相Ⅰ" 信山社 1996

    17 長尾英彦, "景観権」論の現状" 40 (40): 2006

    18 岩間徹, "國際環境法上の予防原則について" (1264) : 2004

    19 堀口健夫, "予防原則の規範的意義" (18) : 2002

    20 松村弓彦, "ロースクール 環境法" 成文堂 2006

    21 Sherry Young, "Regulatory and Judicial Responses to the Possibility of Biological Hazards from Electromagnetic Fields Generated by Powerlines" 36 : 129-, 1991

    22 박종원, "REACH 규칙과 사전배려원칙" 한국환경법학회 31 (31): 109-148, 2009

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.14 1.14 1.15
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.04 0.97 1.226 0.39
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼