RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한국의학물리학회 선형가속기 외부 품질관리 실시 현황보고 = Report on the External Audits Conducted by Korean Society of Medical Physics

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100841596

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The aim of this work is to verify the self-quality assurances in medical institutions in Korea through the external audits by the group of experts and have a mutual discussion of the systematic problems. In order to validate the external audits 30 of 80 medical institutions across the nation were picked out considering the regional distribution and the final 25 institutions applied voluntarily to take part in this work. The basic rules were setup that any information of the participants be kept secrete and the measurements be performed with the dosimetry system already verified through intercomparision. The outputs for 2 or more photon beams, the accuracy of gantry rotation and collimator rotation and the poistional accuracy of MLC movement were measured. The findings for the output measurement showed the differences of -0.8%~4.5%, -0.79%~3.01%, and -0.7%~0.07% with respect to that of the verified dosimetry system for the 6MV, 10MV, and 15MV, respectively. For the reference absorbed dose 8 (16%) of 50 photon beams in 25 medical institutions differed 2.0% or greater from the reference value. The coincidences of Field size with x-ray beam and radiation isocenters of Gantry roration and collimator rotation gave the results of within ${\pm}2$ mm for every institute except 2 institutions. The positional accuracy of MLC movement agreed to within ${\pm}1$ mm for every institute. For the beam qualities of 6 MV photon beams kQ values showed the distribution within 0.4% between maximum and minimum. For the protocols 21 institutions (84%) used absorbed dose to water based protocol while 4 insitutions (16%) used air kerma based one. 22 institutions employed the SSD technique while 3 institutions did the SAD one. External audit plays an important role in discovering the systematic problems of self-performing Quality Assurances and having in depth discussion for mutual complementation. Training experts of international level as well as national support system are required so that both the group of experts of medical physicists and government laboratory could perform together periodical and constant external audits.
      번역하기

      The aim of this work is to verify the self-quality assurances in medical institutions in Korea through the external audits by the group of experts and have a mutual discussion of the systematic problems. In order to validate the external audits 30 of ...

      The aim of this work is to verify the self-quality assurances in medical institutions in Korea through the external audits by the group of experts and have a mutual discussion of the systematic problems. In order to validate the external audits 30 of 80 medical institutions across the nation were picked out considering the regional distribution and the final 25 institutions applied voluntarily to take part in this work. The basic rules were setup that any information of the participants be kept secrete and the measurements be performed with the dosimetry system already verified through intercomparision. The outputs for 2 or more photon beams, the accuracy of gantry rotation and collimator rotation and the poistional accuracy of MLC movement were measured. The findings for the output measurement showed the differences of -0.8%~4.5%, -0.79%~3.01%, and -0.7%~0.07% with respect to that of the verified dosimetry system for the 6MV, 10MV, and 15MV, respectively. For the reference absorbed dose 8 (16%) of 50 photon beams in 25 medical institutions differed 2.0% or greater from the reference value. The coincidences of Field size with x-ray beam and radiation isocenters of Gantry roration and collimator rotation gave the results of within ${\pm}2$ mm for every institute except 2 institutions. The positional accuracy of MLC movement agreed to within ${\pm}1$ mm for every institute. For the beam qualities of 6 MV photon beams kQ values showed the distribution within 0.4% between maximum and minimum. For the protocols 21 institutions (84%) used absorbed dose to water based protocol while 4 insitutions (16%) used air kerma based one. 22 institutions employed the SSD technique while 3 institutions did the SAD one. External audit plays an important role in discovering the systematic problems of self-performing Quality Assurances and having in depth discussion for mutual complementation. Training experts of international level as well as national support system are required so that both the group of experts of medical physicists and government laboratory could perform together periodical and constant external audits.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Khan FM, "The Physics of Radiation Therapy" Williams & Wilkins 481-506, 2003

      2 Chui CS, "Testing of dynamic multileaf collimation" 23 (23): 635-641, 1996

      3 Malhotra HK, "Technical and dosimetric considerations in IMRT treatment planning for large target volumes" 6 (6): 77-87, 2005

      4 Cung JB, "Statistical analysis of IMRT dosimetry quality assurance measurements for local delivery guideline" 6 : 1-8, 2011

      5 Moran JM, "Safety considerations for IMRT: Executive summary" 1 : 190-195, 2011

      6 Bayouth JE, "MLC quality assurance techniques for IMRT applications" 30 (30): 743-750, 2003

      7 Kataria t, "Intensity modulated radiotherapy in abdominal malignancies: our experience in reductiong the dose to normal structures as compared to the gross tumor" 2 (2): 161-165, 2006

      8 Losasso T, "IMRT delivery performance with a varian multileaf collimator" 70 (70): S85-88, 2008

      9 Ezzell GA, "Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee" 30 (30): 2089-2115, 2003

      10 "Basic application of multileaf collimators" American Association of Medical Physicists in Medicine 2001

      1 Khan FM, "The Physics of Radiation Therapy" Williams & Wilkins 481-506, 2003

      2 Chui CS, "Testing of dynamic multileaf collimation" 23 (23): 635-641, 1996

      3 Malhotra HK, "Technical and dosimetric considerations in IMRT treatment planning for large target volumes" 6 (6): 77-87, 2005

      4 Cung JB, "Statistical analysis of IMRT dosimetry quality assurance measurements for local delivery guideline" 6 : 1-8, 2011

      5 Moran JM, "Safety considerations for IMRT: Executive summary" 1 : 190-195, 2011

      6 Bayouth JE, "MLC quality assurance techniques for IMRT applications" 30 (30): 743-750, 2003

      7 Kataria t, "Intensity modulated radiotherapy in abdominal malignancies: our experience in reductiong the dose to normal structures as compared to the gross tumor" 2 (2): 161-165, 2006

      8 Losasso T, "IMRT delivery performance with a varian multileaf collimator" 70 (70): S85-88, 2008

      9 Ezzell GA, "Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee" 30 (30): 2089-2115, 2003

      10 "Basic application of multileaf collimators" American Association of Medical Physicists in Medicine 2001

      11 Sastre-Padro M, "An accurate calibration method of the multileaf collimator valid for conformal and intensity modulated radiation treatments" 49 (49): 2631-2643, 2004

      12 Klein EE, "AAPM Report 142: Quality assurance of medical accelerators" 36 : 4197-4212, 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2014-07-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Medical Physics -> PROGRESS in MEDICAL PHYSICS KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼