임파워링 리더십의 권한과 책임에 따른 양면적 효과 = Two Faces of Authority Delegation and Accountability of Empowering Leadership

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study empirically examined the two faces of empowering leadership, i.e. the enabling process and the burdening process, when empowering leadership is decomposed into authority delegation and accountability with the sample of 219 followers in private companies. The enabling process, which means that the leader’s empowering leadership enhances the follower’s work role performance through increasing the follower’s self-efficacy, is empirically demonstrated when the empowering leadership is authority delegation and accountability respectively. The burdening process, which means that the leader’s empowering leadership undermines the follower’s work role performance through increasing the follower’s job induced tension, is not empirically demonstrated when the empowering leadership is authority delegation and accountability respectively. The follower’s job induced tension increases the follower’s work role performance unexpectedly. Furthermore, the follower’s job induced tension has an inverted U-shaped relationship with the follower’s task proactivity, which is a dimension of work role performance. The leader’s authority delegation of empowering leadership decreases the follower’s job induced tension unexpectedly. The leader’s accountability of empowering leadership increases the follower’s job induced tension more than the leader’s authority delegation of empowering leadership does. Based on the results, theoretical and practical implications are discussed, and recommendations for future research are provided.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 송경수, "직무만족과조직몰입의 조직시민행동에 대한 매개역할에 관한 탐색적 연구" 7 (7): 139-189, 1999

2 이준혁, "임파워먼트의 양면적 효과: 권한과 책임의 개별적 효과와 상호작용 효과를 중심으로" 한국인사조직학회 29 (29): 73-95, 2021

3 고승석 ; 신호철, "임파워링 리더십이 직무긴장을 매개로 직무만족에 미치는 효과: 간호사를 중심으로" 글로벌경영학회 16 (16): 115-135, 2019

4 하선미 ; 문재승, "임파워링 리더십이 잡크래프팅과 직무성과에 미치는 영향 : 신뢰받는 느낌, 심리적 안전감, 내적 동기의 매개효과" 한국인적자원개발학회 25 (25): 187-212, 2022

5 강윤진 ; 손영우, "임파워링 리더십이 구성원의 직무스트레스에 미치는 양면적 영향: 자아효능감과 책임감의 매개효과와 조직지원인식의 조절된 매개효과" 한국산업및조직심리학회 33 (33): 373-407, 2020

6 이준혁 ; 이의연 ; 전정호, "임파워링 리더십이 구성원들에게 미치는 부정적인 영향 - 임파워링 리더십의 통제권 부여 특성을 중심으로 -" 한국인적자원관리학회 26 (26): 1-31, 2019

7 이시영 ; 김선혁, "임파워링 리더십과 실패를 통한 학습이 발언 행동에 미치는 영향: 심리적 안정감의 매개효과" 한국인적자원개발학회 24 (24): 87-113, 2021

8 홍세희, "인사조직 연구를 위한 매개효과와 조절효과 검증 방법" 국민대학교 2009

9 김혜선 ; 탁진국, "리더의 임파워링 행동이 직무 열의에 미치는 영향: 직무 개선(job crafting)의 매개효과와 핵심자기평가 및 개인-직무 부합의 조절효과" 한국산업및조직심리학회 28 (28): 275-299, 2015

10 권상집, "리더의 임파워링 리더십, 구성원의 잡 크래프팅, 직무만족, 창의성 간의 구조적 관계 분석" 한국인적자원개발학회 26 (26): 85-104, 2023

11 정원호 ; 기호연 ; 박준호, "국내 임파워링 리더십 연구에 대한 고찰" 한국인적자원개발학회 23 (23): 1-29, 2020

12 Zivnuska, S., "What is too much or too little? The curvilinear effects of job tension on turnover intent, value attainment and job satisfaction" 32 (32): 1344-1360, 2002

13 Chen, G., "Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale" 4 : 62-83, 2001

14 Cheong, M., "Two faces of empowering leadership : Enabling and burdening" 27 (27): 602-616, 2016

15 Ahearne, M., "To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance" 90 : 945-955, 2005

16 Baron, R. M., "The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : Conceptual strategic and statistical considerations" 51 : 1173-1182, 1986

17 Chebat, J. C., "The impact of empowerment on customer contact followers' roles in service organizations" 3 : 66-81, 2000

18 Yun, S., "The forgotten follower : A contingency model of leadership and follower self-leadership" 21 : 374-388, 2006

19 Bandura, A., "The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory" 4 (4): 359-373, 1986

20 Conger, J. A., "The empowerment process : Integrating theory and practice" 13 (13): 471-482, 1988

21 Selye, H., "The Stress of Life" McGraw-Hill 1956

22 Lazarus, R. S., "Stress, Appraisal, and Coping" Springer 1984

23 Hobfoll, S. E., "Social and psychological resources and adaptation" 6 : 307-324, 2002

24 Stajkovic, A. D., "Self-efficacy and work-related performance : A meta-analysis" 124 : 240-261, 1998

25 Rizzo, J. R., "Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations" 15 : 150-163, 1970

26 House, R. J., "Role conflict and ambiguity as critical variables in a model of organizational behavior" 7 : 467-505, 1972

27 Spector, P. E., "Relation of job stressors to affective, health and performance outcomes : A comparison of multiple data sources" 73 : 11-19, 1988

28 Spreitzer, G. M., "Psychological empowerment in the workplace : Dimensions, measurement, and validation" 38 : 1442-1465, 1995

29 Kahn, R. L., "Organizational Stress" Wiley 1964

30 Van den Broeck, A., "Not all job demands are equal : Differentiating job hindrances and job challenges in the job demands-resources model" 19 (19): 735-759, 2010

31 Humborstad, S. I. W., "Mutuality in leader–subordinate empowerment expectation : Its impact on role ambiguity and intrinsic motivation" 24 (24): 363-377, 2013

32 Hackman, J. R., "Motivation through the design of work : Test of a theory" 16 (16): 250-279, 1976

33 Zhang, X., "Linking empowering leadership and follower creativity : The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement" 53 : 107-128, 2010

34 Sharma, P. N., "Leveraging leaders : A literature review and future lines of inquiry for empowering leadership research" 40 (40): 193-237, 2015

35 Schaufeli, W. B., "Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement : A multi-sample study" 25 (25): 293-315, 2004

36 Harris, T. B., "Getting what’s new from newcomers : Empowering leadership, creativity, and adjustment in the socialization context" 67 (67): 567-604, 2014

37 Cook, J. D., "Experience of Work : A Compendium and Review of 249 Measures and Their Use" Academic Press 1981

38 Lorinkova, N. M., "Examining the differential longitudinal performance of directive versus empowering leadership in teams" 56 (56): 573-596, 2013

39 Forrester, R., "Empowerment : Rejuvenating a potent idea" 14 (14): 67-80, 2000

40 Ford, R. C., "Empowerment : A matter of degree" 9 (9): 21-29, 1995

41 Humborstad, S. I. W., "Empowering leadership, employee goal orientations and work performance A competing hypothesis approach" 43 (43): 246-271, 2014

42 Langfred, C. W., "Effects of task autonomy on performance : An extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms" 89 : 934-945, 2004

43 Podsakoff, N. P., "Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover and withdrawal behavior : A meta-analysis" 92 (92): 438-454, 2007

44 Konczak, L. J., "Defining and measuring empowering leader behaviors : Development of an upward feedback instrument" 60 (60): 301-313, 2000

45 Hobfoll, S. E., "Conservation of resource : A new attempt at conceptualizing stress" 44 : 513-524, 1989

46 Thomas, K. W., "Cognitive elements of empowerment:An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation" 15 : 666-681, 1990

47 Kirkman, B. L., "Beyond self-management : Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment" 42 : 58-74, 1999

48 Takeuchi, R., "An integrative view of international experiences : An empirical examination" 48 : 85-100, 2005

49 Griffin, M. A., "A new model of work role performance : Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts" 50 : 327-347, 2007

50 Gilboa, S., "A meta-analysis of work demand stressors and job performance : Examining main and moderating effects" 61 : 227-271, 2008