RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      2022 개정 통합교과 교육과정과 교과용 도서의 구조적 긴장에 대한 탐색: 주제의 성격 차이를 중심으로 = An Exploration of Structural Tensions between the 2022 Revised Integrated Curriculum and Textbooks: Focusing on Differences in the Characteristic of “Theme”

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109898984

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study explored whether substantive differences exist between the ‘themes developed by students and teachers’ intended in the 2022 revised integrated curriculum and the themes implemented in textbooks. To this end, the study compared and analyzed the characteristics of themes in curriculum documents and textbooks based on the criteria of status, function, and source. The analysis revealed that the intended themes in curriculum documents were unit titles derived from students’ lives and subject content, serving both as a principle for organizing learning experiences and as a starting point for inquiry. The implemented themes in textbooks largely retained these characteristics, while textbook themes and the lessons developed around them were used as additional sources. Furthermore, the implemented themes were presented not only at the level of unit titles but also at the level of subunit and lesson titles, and their functions were diversified depending on the textbook themes and content. These differences between intended and implemented themes were identified as a source of structural tension between the national curriculum and textbooks, while simultaneously providing meaningful support for feasible approaches to theme development in classroom practice.
      번역하기

      This study explored whether substantive differences exist between the ‘themes developed by students and teachers’ intended in the 2022 revised integrated curriculum and the themes implemented in textbooks. To this end, the study compared and analy...

      This study explored whether substantive differences exist between the ‘themes developed by students and teachers’ intended in the 2022 revised integrated curriculum and the themes implemented in textbooks. To this end, the study compared and analyzed the characteristics of themes in curriculum documents and textbooks based on the criteria of status, function, and source. The analysis revealed that the intended themes in curriculum documents were unit titles derived from students’ lives and subject content, serving both as a principle for organizing learning experiences and as a starting point for inquiry. The implemented themes in textbooks largely retained these characteristics, while textbook themes and the lessons developed around them were used as additional sources. Furthermore, the implemented themes were presented not only at the level of unit titles but also at the level of subunit and lesson titles, and their functions were diversified depending on the textbook themes and content. These differences between intended and implemented themes were identified as a source of structural tension between the national curriculum and textbooks, while simultaneously providing meaningful support for feasible approaches to theme development in classroom practice.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼