RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      懲罰的損害賠償의 機能과 限界 = Efficiency and Deterrence in the Law of punitive damages

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19622707

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In Korea, the Civil Law has no statutes providing generally for "punitive damages" awards in tort cases. The purposes of this article are focused on the reception of the punitive damages.
      The doctrine of punitive damages, with deep roots in ancient law, was first received by the English common law 1763. The punitive damages was rapidly transported to USA and by the middle of the 19 C. had gained substantial acceptance in this country.
      Since punitive damages are assessed for punishment and not for reparation, a positive element of consious wrongdoing is always required. It must be shown either that the defendant was actuated by ill will, malice or evil motive, which may appear by direct evidence of such motive, or from the inherent character of the tort itself, or from the oppressive character of his conduct.
      Few commentators today challenge the appropriateness of including a punitive damages claim in actions based on negligence or fraud and deceit, even in the area of products liability the litigation. But "Strict liability and punitive damages", it is asserted, "will not mix". In strict liability the character of the defendant's act is of no consequence; in the punitive damages claim based upon allegations of aggravated fault is logically incompatible with a strict products liability action in which the manufacturer's care is not relevant to the determination of liability for compensatory damages. But punitive damages awards habe been held appropriate in a number or cases involving various other causes of action based on strict principles of liability.
      There are difficulties in measuring and controlling punitive damages awards in all tort cases. It is suggested to determine a proper amount for such damages in consideration of the character of the defendant's act, nature and extent of the harm to the plaintiff. Insurance coverage of punitive damages assessments should be prohibited as contrary to public policy.
      번역하기

      In Korea, the Civil Law has no statutes providing generally for "punitive damages" awards in tort cases. The purposes of this article are focused on the reception of the punitive damages. The doctrine of punitive damages, with deep roots in...

      In Korea, the Civil Law has no statutes providing generally for "punitive damages" awards in tort cases. The purposes of this article are focused on the reception of the punitive damages.
      The doctrine of punitive damages, with deep roots in ancient law, was first received by the English common law 1763. The punitive damages was rapidly transported to USA and by the middle of the 19 C. had gained substantial acceptance in this country.
      Since punitive damages are assessed for punishment and not for reparation, a positive element of consious wrongdoing is always required. It must be shown either that the defendant was actuated by ill will, malice or evil motive, which may appear by direct evidence of such motive, or from the inherent character of the tort itself, or from the oppressive character of his conduct.
      Few commentators today challenge the appropriateness of including a punitive damages claim in actions based on negligence or fraud and deceit, even in the area of products liability the litigation. But "Strict liability and punitive damages", it is asserted, "will not mix". In strict liability the character of the defendant's act is of no consequence; in the punitive damages claim based upon allegations of aggravated fault is logically incompatible with a strict products liability action in which the manufacturer's care is not relevant to the determination of liability for compensatory damages. But punitive damages awards habe been held appropriate in a number or cases involving various other causes of action based on strict principles of liability.
      There are difficulties in measuring and controlling punitive damages awards in all tort cases. It is suggested to determine a proper amount for such damages in consideration of the character of the defendant's act, nature and extent of the harm to the plaintiff. Insurance coverage of punitive damages assessments should be prohibited as contrary to public policy.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼