RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      W3 XML Schema와 XDR의 비교 연구 = Comparison W3 XML Schema with XDR

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19611997

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      With the development of aviation technology, it has diminished that the accident caused by the aircraft defect. The aircraft in air force is a very important war equipment and represents the strongest power, but as passing the hour, the accident caused by a human error has been increasing rather than a mechanical error.
      Considering that 65% of whole accidents are caused by human error, the systematic and scientific safety management is needed. The human error is caused by the involved elements affecting the psychological and physical environment, like condition, task and device etc., causing not only individual error but also behavioral error and working on the engineer.
      Therefore in this study, I will examine the inductive factors of aircraft maintenance error theoretically and than prove the factors affect the human error practically. I measured at 5 point degree index by dividing the human error factors into the environment nature, task nature, device nature, individual nature. The 250 questionnaires from the aircraft maintenance engineers were analyzed statistically by using the factor causing human error and correlation analysis, regression analysis among the human errors. As a result of analysis, the influence that each independence variation affect the subordination variance, human error, is identified meaningful statistically in 5% significant level, as device nature(β=-.1475), task nature(β=-.1320), environment nature (β=.1308), individual nature(β=.2806) and then all hypotheses are accepted.
      In this study, what I want to emphasize is to improve the quality of maintenance through improvement of physical working environment and the working place design, the offer of protection equipment and the instruction and training of task and to prevent the human error.
      번역하기

      With the development of aviation technology, it has diminished that the accident caused by the aircraft defect. The aircraft in air force is a very important war equipment and represents the strongest power, but as passing the hour, the accident cause...

      With the development of aviation technology, it has diminished that the accident caused by the aircraft defect. The aircraft in air force is a very important war equipment and represents the strongest power, but as passing the hour, the accident caused by a human error has been increasing rather than a mechanical error.
      Considering that 65% of whole accidents are caused by human error, the systematic and scientific safety management is needed. The human error is caused by the involved elements affecting the psychological and physical environment, like condition, task and device etc., causing not only individual error but also behavioral error and working on the engineer.
      Therefore in this study, I will examine the inductive factors of aircraft maintenance error theoretically and than prove the factors affect the human error practically. I measured at 5 point degree index by dividing the human error factors into the environment nature, task nature, device nature, individual nature. The 250 questionnaires from the aircraft maintenance engineers were analyzed statistically by using the factor causing human error and correlation analysis, regression analysis among the human errors. As a result of analysis, the influence that each independence variation affect the subordination variance, human error, is identified meaningful statistically in 5% significant level, as device nature(β=-.1475), task nature(β=-.1320), environment nature (β=.1308), individual nature(β=.2806) and then all hypotheses are accepted.
      In this study, what I want to emphasize is to improve the quality of maintenance through improvement of physical working environment and the working place design, the offer of protection equipment and the instruction and training of task and to prevent the human error.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서 론
      • Ⅱ. 안전관리의 이론적 고찰
      • Ⅲ. 항공기정비의 인적요인에 관한 고찰
      • Ⅳ. 실증적 분석
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • Ⅰ. 서 론
      • Ⅱ. 안전관리의 이론적 고찰
      • Ⅲ. 항공기정비의 인적요인에 관한 고찰
      • Ⅳ. 실증적 분석
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼