RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    소유권의 소극적 침해 - 대법원 1995. 9. 15. 선고 95다23378 판결 - = Negative Infringement of Ownership

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105011691

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    ⅰ) This case was brought by alleging the negative infringement of ownership, not environmental pollution, is expected to arise from the fact that the construction of apartment complex near Pusan University will impair the natural scenery and educational environment.
    ii) The environmental pollution has regard to the positive infringement,but negative infringement means that an act or behavior in his or her lands takes up the interest of other lands, which is discussed as the issues of rights to sunshine and view. And similar one to negative infringement is the ideal infringement, which means such an act or behavior impairs other landowners' emotional feelings. For example, the businesses such as junkyard, charnel house and, brothels are operated near the land property so that the emotional infringement against property owner can be incurred.
    iii) Whether or not the environmental pollution includes negative infringement is disputable and a minority of domestic opinion insists that negative infringement corresponds to environmental pollution. But the diffusion of emissions, noise, sound, vibration, and others causes positive infringement, and the environmental pollution does not means such negative infringement without those unweighable stuffs.
    vi) The infringement under the Article 1004 of German Civil Act shall not mean and include the concept of negative infringement. But only if negative infringement may result in the violation against the articles of the neighbor-related laws, such infringement is constructed as the ownership infringement. But a majority of domestic opinions think that the above negative infringement attracts and means the infringement of ownership under the Article 204 of Korean Civil Act.
    v) The negative infringement, in principle, may not be construed as the infringement of ownership and, in my opinion, only the infringement in the violation against the articles of the neighbor-related act or construction act may be interpreted there exists negative infringement.
    Accordingly, this case shall not be agreed easily in the point that an injunction is awarded against the infringement of ownership.
    번역하기

    ⅰ) This case was brought by alleging the negative infringement of ownership, not environmental pollution, is expected to arise from the fact that the construction of apartment complex near Pusan University will impair the natural scenery and educati...

    ⅰ) This case was brought by alleging the negative infringement of ownership, not environmental pollution, is expected to arise from the fact that the construction of apartment complex near Pusan University will impair the natural scenery and educational environment.
    ii) The environmental pollution has regard to the positive infringement,but negative infringement means that an act or behavior in his or her lands takes up the interest of other lands, which is discussed as the issues of rights to sunshine and view. And similar one to negative infringement is the ideal infringement, which means such an act or behavior impairs other landowners' emotional feelings. For example, the businesses such as junkyard, charnel house and, brothels are operated near the land property so that the emotional infringement against property owner can be incurred.
    iii) Whether or not the environmental pollution includes negative infringement is disputable and a minority of domestic opinion insists that negative infringement corresponds to environmental pollution. But the diffusion of emissions, noise, sound, vibration, and others causes positive infringement, and the environmental pollution does not means such negative infringement without those unweighable stuffs.
    vi) The infringement under the Article 1004 of German Civil Act shall not mean and include the concept of negative infringement. But only if negative infringement may result in the violation against the articles of the neighbor-related laws, such infringement is constructed as the ownership infringement. But a majority of domestic opinions think that the above negative infringement attracts and means the infringement of ownership under the Article 204 of Korean Civil Act.
    v) The negative infringement, in principle, may not be construed as the infringement of ownership and, in my opinion, only the infringement in the violation against the articles of the neighbor-related act or construction act may be interpreted there exists negative infringement.
    Accordingly, this case shall not be agreed easily in the point that an injunction is awarded against the infringement of ownership.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김상용, "환경침해불법행위, 후암곽윤직선생고희기념, 민법학논총`第二" 박영사 1995

    2 윤진수, "환경침해를 이유로 하는 유지청구의 許容與否, 判例月報"

    3 오석락, "환경소송의 제문제" 일신사 1991

    4 구연창, "환경법(개정판)" 법문사 1993

    5 허 영, "헌법이론과 헌법(제7판)" 박영사 2002

    6 김종률, "조망권의 법적 구성론" 2003

    7 안경희, "임미시온에 대한 적극적·소극적 방어" 6 : 2001

    8 전경운, "소음침해에 대한 방해제거 및 방해예방청구권의 법적 근거와 인용의무 등 ― 대법원 2007. 6. 15. 선고 2004다37904,37911 판결 ―" 한국민사법학회 (42) : 405-456, 2008

    9 김재형, "소유권과 환경보호, 한국민법이론의 발전(Ⅰ)" 박영사 1999

    10 김증한, "물권법(제9판)" 박영사 1998

    1 김상용, "환경침해불법행위, 후암곽윤직선생고희기념, 민법학논총`第二" 박영사 1995

    2 윤진수, "환경침해를 이유로 하는 유지청구의 許容與否, 判例月報"

    3 오석락, "환경소송의 제문제" 일신사 1991

    4 구연창, "환경법(개정판)" 법문사 1993

    5 허 영, "헌법이론과 헌법(제7판)" 박영사 2002

    6 김종률, "조망권의 법적 구성론" 2003

    7 안경희, "임미시온에 대한 적극적·소극적 방어" 6 : 2001

    8 전경운, "소음침해에 대한 방해제거 및 방해예방청구권의 법적 근거와 인용의무 등 ― 대법원 2007. 6. 15. 선고 2004다37904,37911 판결 ―" 한국민사법학회 (42) : 405-456, 2008

    9 김재형, "소유권과 환경보호, 한국민법이론의 발전(Ⅰ)" 박영사 1999

    10 김증한, "물권법(제9판)" 박영사 1998

    11 곽윤직, "물권법(제7판)" 박영사 2002

    12 홍성재, "물권법" 대영문화사 2006

    13 이영준, "물권법" 박영사 1992

    14 김상용, "물권법" 화산미디어 2009

    15 전경운, "독일 환경사법론" 법문사 1998

    16 허상수, "교육환경의 침해로 인한 유지청구" 부산판례연구회 7 : 1995

    17 진순석, "교육환경권침해와 유지청구" 10 : 1995

    18 이용우, "공해방지소송" 법원행정처 2 : 1979

    19 안경희, "觀念的 侵害(Ideelle Einwirkung)에 대한 小考" 한국재산법학회 20 (20): 63-87, 2003

    20 조성민, "環境侵害와 妨害排除請求權의 認否" 考試界 1996

    21 곽윤직, "民法注解(Ⅴ)" 박영사 1992

    22 곽윤직, "債權各論(新訂版)" 박영사 1995

    23 "Wilhelm Herschel, Zur Neugestaltung des Immissionsrechts, JZ 1959, 72"

    24 "Staudingers Komm., 13. Aufl."

    25 "Peter Marburger, Ausbau des Individualschutzes gegen Umweltbelastungen als Aufgabe des bürgerlichen und des öffentlichen Rechts, Das Gutachten Marburgers zum 56. DJT(1986), Bd. Ⅰ"

    26 "Peter Baumann, Die Haftung für Umweltschäden aus zivilrechtlicher Sicht, JuS 1989, 438"

    27 "Othmar Jauernig, Zivilrechtlicher Schutz des Grundeigentums in der neuern Rechtsentwicklung, JZ 1986, 606"

    28 "Münchener Komm., 3. Aufl."

    29 "Manfred Wolf, Sachenrecht, 13. Aufl."

    30 "Karl Heinz Schwab/Hanns Prütting, Sachenrecht, 32. Aufl."

    31 "Jürgen F. Baur/Rolf Stürner, Lehrbuch des Sachenrechts, 16. Aufl."

    32 "Johannes Köndgen, Überlegungen zur Fortbildung des Umwelthaftpflichtrechts, UPR 1983, 349"

    33 "Johann W. Gerlach, Die Grundstrukturen des privaten Umweltrechts im Spannungsverhältnis zum öffentlichen Recht, JZ 1988, 174"

    34 "Hubert Webert/Christine Weber, Zu den Abwehransprüchen des Nacheren, VersR 1993, 16"

    35 "Hans Forkel, Immissionsschutz und Persönlichkeitsrecht, Köln"

    36 "Gert Brüggemeier, Deliktsrecht"

    37 "Dieter Medicus, Zivilrecht und Umweltschutz, JZ 1986, 771"

    38 "Christian von Bar, Zur Dogmatik des zivilrechtlichen Ausgleichs von Umweltschäden, Karlsruher Forum 1987, 5"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2014-01-13 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Journal of Civil Law KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.42 1.42 1.24
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.13 1.08 1.392 0.31
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼