RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      푸틴 집권 시기 러시아의 민주주의 공고화에 대한 평가 = Evaluation of Consolidation of Democracy of Russia during Putin`s Ruling Period

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99879828

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to evaluate the consolidation of democracy of Russia during Putin`s rule. Consolidation of democracy does not mean that democracy retrogresses but continues. Considering the characteristic of modern society that aims representative democracy, the analysis of the consolidation of democracy of Russia based on the minimalist perspective has failed. This is because the consolidation of democracy, which experienced segmental times in 2003 and 2008, has been retrogressing from semi-consolidated authoritarian regimes to consolidated ones. As diverse variables such as weakness of civil society, national apathy for democracy, unfairness of elections, government`s control over national media, and formation of state-centric oligarchy economic society have been multiplying and interacting with one another, Russian democracy has been retrogressing, instead of continuing to develop. Characteristics of non-consolidated democracy, made out of the retrogression of democracy, have come to form the discourse structure called “Russian style democracy” represented by sovereign democracy, electoral democracy, or managed democracy. Serious challenges that inhibit the present government established through democratic procedures in Russian society have not been identified yet. However, the large scaled anti-government demonstration of civil society against the alleged election frauds of Duma in 2011 and 2012 and Putin`s re-seizure of political power demonstrate that the Third Putin Administration will be able to acquire legal legitimacy of power if the administration acknowledges democratic constitutionalism, rather than focusing on efficiency of the state affairs operation, as the “only game in town”.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to evaluate the consolidation of democracy of Russia during Putin`s rule. Consolidation of democracy does not mean that democracy retrogresses but continues. Considering the characteristic of modern society that aims repre...

      The purpose of this study is to evaluate the consolidation of democracy of Russia during Putin`s rule. Consolidation of democracy does not mean that democracy retrogresses but continues. Considering the characteristic of modern society that aims representative democracy, the analysis of the consolidation of democracy of Russia based on the minimalist perspective has failed. This is because the consolidation of democracy, which experienced segmental times in 2003 and 2008, has been retrogressing from semi-consolidated authoritarian regimes to consolidated ones. As diverse variables such as weakness of civil society, national apathy for democracy, unfairness of elections, government`s control over national media, and formation of state-centric oligarchy economic society have been multiplying and interacting with one another, Russian democracy has been retrogressing, instead of continuing to develop. Characteristics of non-consolidated democracy, made out of the retrogression of democracy, have come to form the discourse structure called “Russian style democracy” represented by sovereign democracy, electoral democracy, or managed democracy. Serious challenges that inhibit the present government established through democratic procedures in Russian society have not been identified yet. However, the large scaled anti-government demonstration of civil society against the alleged election frauds of Duma in 2011 and 2012 and Putin`s re-seizure of political power demonstrate that the Third Putin Administration will be able to acquire legal legitimacy of power if the administration acknowledges democratic constitutionalism, rather than focusing on efficiency of the state affairs operation, as the “only game in town”.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "헤리티지재단"

      2 "프리덤하우스"

      3 김유은, "푸틴의 공세적 외교정책과 러시아의 동북아 다자안보에 대한 입장" 아태지역연구센터 34 (34): 111-137, 2010

      4 두진호, "푸틴 집권 시기 러시아의 안보정책 평가와 전망: 경로의존성을중심으로" 70 (70): 13-41, 2012

      5 이상준, "유라시아 권위주의 국가와 대기업: 러시아 사례" 77-107, 2010

      6 "세계경제포럼"

      7 "레바다센터"

      8 "러시아중앙선거관리위원회"

      9 이홍섭, "러시아의 권력구조와 민주주의 - 제도적 특성과 정치문화" 아태지역연구센터 29 (29): 123-145, 2005

      10 유진숙, "러시아 민주주의 공고화와 정치과정" 아태지역연구센터 34 (34): 207-231, 2010

      1 "헤리티지재단"

      2 "프리덤하우스"

      3 김유은, "푸틴의 공세적 외교정책과 러시아의 동북아 다자안보에 대한 입장" 아태지역연구센터 34 (34): 111-137, 2010

      4 두진호, "푸틴 집권 시기 러시아의 안보정책 평가와 전망: 경로의존성을중심으로" 70 (70): 13-41, 2012

      5 이상준, "유라시아 권위주의 국가와 대기업: 러시아 사례" 77-107, 2010

      6 "세계경제포럼"

      7 "레바다센터"

      8 "러시아중앙선거관리위원회"

      9 이홍섭, "러시아의 권력구조와 민주주의 - 제도적 특성과 정치문화" 아태지역연구센터 29 (29): 123-145, 2005

      10 유진숙, "러시아 민주주의 공고화와 정치과정" 아태지역연구센터 34 (34): 207-231, 2010

      11 "러시아 공산당"

      12 김석준, "뉴거버넌스 연구" 대영문화사 2000

      13 "국제인권감시기구"

      14 "Федеральный закон “О политических партиях”"

      15 "Федеральный закон Российской Федерации от 20 июля 2012 г. N 121-ФЗ ≪О внесении изменений в отдельные законода тельные акты Российской Федерации в части регулиров ания деятельности некоммерческих организаций, выполн яющих функции иностранного агента≫"

      16 Human Right Watch, "Разрушительное законотворчество наст упление на гражданское общество в России после мая 2012 года"

      17 Подъячев К. В, "Протестное движение в России «нулевых»: генезис и специфика" (5) : 145-163, 2012

      18 Сурков В. Ю, "Национализация будущего // Эксперт № 43(537)"

      19 Путин В. В, "Демократия и качество государства"

      20 Schedler, Andreas, "What is Democratic Consolidation" 9 (9): 91-107, 1998

      21 Przeworski, Adam, "What Makes Democracies Endure?" 7 (7): 39-55, 1996

      22 Linz, Juan J, "Toward Consolidated Democracies" 77 (77): 14-33, 1996

      23 Huntington, Samuel P, "The Third Wave: Democratization in Late Twentieth Century" University of Oklahoma Press 1991

      24 Skillen, Daphne, "The Next General Elections in Russia: What Role for the Media?" 59 (59): 1263-1278, 2007

      25 Pridham, Geoffrey, "The International Context of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective, In The Politics of Democratic Consolidation" The Johns Hopkins University Press 166-203, 1995

      26 Gasiporowski, Mark J, "The Determinants of Democratic Consolidation: Evidence From the Third World" 31 (31): 740-771, 1998

      27 Przeworski, Adam, "Sustainable Democracy" Cambridge University Press 1995

      28 Linz, Juan J, "Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe" Johns Hopkins University Press 1996

      29 Mathews, J, "Power Shift" 76 (76): 50-66, 1997

      30 Dahl, Robert, "Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition" Yale University Press 1971

      31 Sartori, Giovanni, "Parties and Party Systems" Cambridge University Press 1976

      32 Held, David, "Models of Democracy" Stanford University Press 1987

      33 Putnam, Robert, "Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy" Princeton University Press 1993

      34 Chu, Yun-han, "How People View Democracy: Holting Progress in Korea and Taiwan" 12 (12): 122-136, 2001

      35 Diamond, Larry, "Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation" John Hopkins University Press 1999

      36 Przeworski, Adam, "Democracy and the Market" Cambridge University Press 1991

      37 O'Donnell, Guillermo, "Delegative Democracy" 5 (5): 55-69, 1994

      38 Anheier, Helmut K, "Civil Society: Measurement and Policy Dialogue" Earthscan 2004

      39 Schumpeter, Joseph, "Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy"

      40 Edwards, B, "Beyond Tocqueville: Civil Society and the Social Capital Debate in Comparative Perspective" University Press of New England 2001

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-06-27 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Locality and Globality: Korean Journal of Social Sciences -> Locality and Globality: International Journal of Social Sciences KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-04-17 학술지명변경 한글명 : 사회과학연구 -> 지역과 세계
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> Locality and Globality: Korean Journal of Social Sciences
      KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.68 0.68 0.64
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.62 0.66 0.95 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼