RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    전환기의 한국 형법-사형제도의 새로운 시각- = Korean Criminal Law in Transition-Korean Death Penalty-

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Not executing anyone in 2007,Korea is close to being considered a country that has abolished death penalty by the international community. However, death penalty system is existing legally and the Supreme Court keeps it. Also, law abolishing the death penalty proposed by 175 lawmakers wasn't passed but has been a pending issue. It is believed to reflect the reality people have a strong sense of justice and commit a felony continually.
    The death penalty system is rather inhumane because death roll prisoners might tremble with fear for not knowing when would be the day of execution as no execiiting though prisoners are sentenced to death. Also, legislative reform and abolish of death penalty are needed as death roll prisoners can’t have corrective training during waiting for execution with criminal policy.
    The system of death penalty suspension should be introduced as a transitional one to abolish death penalty. We need this system which includes that we should distinguish between validity of death sentence and that of executing before people are convinced of abolition of death penalty system. It also includes that we should replace death penalty with life sentence through corrective training and court’s judgment during the death penalty suspension avoiding misjudgment. It contains that execution infringes on human rights because it is possible that death roll prisoners who can be changed might be executed.
    When it is legally convinced that Korean people reach a consensus to abolish death penalty, we should introduce special penal servitude for life, which is more strict than the present penal servitude for life. We should introduce special penal servitude for life which the day of parole is reckoned from the 20 years after the date of executing penal servitude for life rather than penal servitude for life without parole. Moreover, we should reform regulations of criminal law to be able to assign penal servitude for life as well as special one to criminals and several offences.
    번역하기

    Not executing anyone in 2007,Korea is close to being considered a country that has abolished death penalty by the international community. However, death penalty system is existing legally and the Supreme Court keeps it. Also, law abolishing the dea...

    Not executing anyone in 2007,Korea is close to being considered a country that has abolished death penalty by the international community. However, death penalty system is existing legally and the Supreme Court keeps it. Also, law abolishing the death penalty proposed by 175 lawmakers wasn't passed but has been a pending issue. It is believed to reflect the reality people have a strong sense of justice and commit a felony continually.
    The death penalty system is rather inhumane because death roll prisoners might tremble with fear for not knowing when would be the day of execution as no execiiting though prisoners are sentenced to death. Also, legislative reform and abolish of death penalty are needed as death roll prisoners can’t have corrective training during waiting for execution with criminal policy.
    The system of death penalty suspension should be introduced as a transitional one to abolish death penalty. We need this system which includes that we should distinguish between validity of death sentence and that of executing before people are convinced of abolition of death penalty system. It also includes that we should replace death penalty with life sentence through corrective training and court’s judgment during the death penalty suspension avoiding misjudgment. It contains that execution infringes on human rights because it is possible that death roll prisoners who can be changed might be executed.
    When it is legally convinced that Korean people reach a consensus to abolish death penalty, we should introduce special penal servitude for life, which is more strict than the present penal servitude for life. We should introduce special penal servitude for life which the day of parole is reckoned from the 20 years after the date of executing penal servitude for life rather than penal servitude for life without parole. Moreover, we should reform regulations of criminal law to be able to assign penal servitude for life as well as special one to criminals and several offences.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2014-12-23 학회명변경 영문명 : Law Research Institute, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies -> The HUFS Law Research Institute KCI등재
    2014-12-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> HUFS Law Review KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.97 0.97 0.75
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.72 0.69 0.856 0.38
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼