논항의 판별 기준 = A Criterion for Distinguishing between Arguments and Adjuncts in Korean

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

It is not easy to distinguish between arguments(especially com plements) and adjuncts. So it is necessary to establish a rigorous criterion for distinguishing between arguments and adjuncts in Korean syntax. There are two kinds of syntactic phenomena proposed by some syntactician or adoptable as such criterion. The one is a syntactic phenomenon which argument can become head noun of relative clause in relativization but adjuncts cannot. The other is a syntactic phenomenon which argument can be realized unmarked case in case marking but adjuncts cannot. But these phenomena are not rigorous criteria for distinguishing between arguments and adjuncts because of exceptions in actual syntactic facts. An alternative to these critria is particle-elimination phenomenon showed in focus position of “keot” cleft sentence. Particle is obligatorily eliminated from argument in focus position of “keot” cleft sentence. Contrary to this particle cannot be eliminated from adjunct in focus position of “keot” cleft sentence. So the particle-elimination phenomenon must be adopted a more rigorous criterion than any other syntactic phenomenon for distinguishing between arguments and adjuncts in Korean.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "｢무표격의 조건｣ 계명대학교 언어연구소" 1991

2 "｢논항과 부가어｣ 우리 말글 연구 1" 우리말학회 1994

3 "현대 한국어 동사 구문의 연구" 탑출판사 1987

4 "쪼갠문의 기능과 통사" 한국어문학회 69 : 65-90, 2000

5 "사격 표지와 후치사" 국어학회 34 : 31-58, 1999ᄂ

6 "보족어와 격 표시" 244 : 75-109, 1999ᄀ

7 "문장 구성 성분의 항가 의존성 검토" 173-215, 1996

8 "국어의 보충어와 부가어 판별 기준" 한국언어학회 34 : 75-111, 2002

9 "국어의 논항 구조 연구" 보고사 1995

10 "국어에서의 보충어 범위" 배달말학회 21 : 175-196, 1996

11 "The MIT Press" 1990

12 "On the Nature of Grammatical Relation The MIT Press" 1984