RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    옥수동 AID차관재개발 정책 실행 과정에 관한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82748917

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study focuses on the process being observed in the Guaranty Housing Redevelopment Program supported by(Agency for International Development), which was applied in Oksoo. A review of literature was first done, which revealed that the social and economic environment of the site (site location, poor physical conditions, and high aspiration of the community for improvement) was very appropriate for the application of this program. Next, how the program was applied in the site, and how it visibly changed the site’s physical environment, was discussed. As AID requires that the existing lot boundaries and the site’s basic framework be retained, the existing roads were only improved and not radically changed, and replotting was done.
    In the 1980s, when the replotting was finished, individual houses were built according to the rules of the housing market. As such, these houses, which are for diverse households, even have basements and roofs (ok-tap-bang). Additionally, the plans of these houses are like plans for apartments. Many problems came about, however, because Seoul City did not have any guideline for the construction of houses. Moreover, the officials of Seoul City and AID had differing opinions regarding the construction of houses. AID wanted to preserve the existing housing stock by upgrading it, which Seoul City Hall did not want. Even though Seoul City Hall had a different opinion from AID, it followed the latter’s wishes because it needed the agency’s guaranty. The following study may provide a solution to this problem and may pave the way for the evaluation of the Guaranty Housing Redevelopment Program from diverse viewpoints.
    번역하기

    This study focuses on the process being observed in the Guaranty Housing Redevelopment Program supported by(Agency for International Development), which was applied in Oksoo. A review of literature was first done, which revealed that the social and ec...

    This study focuses on the process being observed in the Guaranty Housing Redevelopment Program supported by(Agency for International Development), which was applied in Oksoo. A review of literature was first done, which revealed that the social and economic environment of the site (site location, poor physical conditions, and high aspiration of the community for improvement) was very appropriate for the application of this program. Next, how the program was applied in the site, and how it visibly changed the site’s physical environment, was discussed. As AID requires that the existing lot boundaries and the site’s basic framework be retained, the existing roads were only improved and not radically changed, and replotting was done.
    In the 1980s, when the replotting was finished, individual houses were built according to the rules of the housing market. As such, these houses, which are for diverse households, even have basements and roofs (ok-tap-bang). Additionally, the plans of these houses are like plans for apartments. Many problems came about, however, because Seoul City did not have any guideline for the construction of houses. Moreover, the officials of Seoul City and AID had differing opinions regarding the construction of houses. AID wanted to preserve the existing housing stock by upgrading it, which Seoul City Hall did not want. Even though Seoul City Hall had a different opinion from AID, it followed the latter’s wishes because it needed the agency’s guaranty. The following study may provide a solution to this problem and may pave the way for the evaluation of the Guaranty Housing Redevelopment Program from diverse viewpoints.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 본론
    • Ⅲ. 맺음말
    • 참고문헌
    • ABSTRACT
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 본론
    • Ⅲ. 맺음말
    • 참고문헌
    • ABSTRACT
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "주택재개발의 이론과 실제" 서울: 사법행정문화원 1995

    2 "주택개량재개발 연혁연구" 서울시정개발연구원 1996

    3 "건축법규 변화에 따른 다가구주택의 특성에 관한 연구" 19 : 2003

    4 "Postmodern Urbanism" Cambridge: Blackwell 1995

    5 "A case study of the Korean housing investment guaranty program 1971-1977" AID 1977

    6 "A Refrain with a View" 12 (12): 1999

    7 "1994 조선시대 서울의 경제생활 서울시립대학교 부설 서울학연구소"

    8 "1989 한국 도시 단독주택의 유형적 지속성과 변용성에 관한 연구"

    9 "1989 불량주택개량사업 추진방안 연구" 건설부

    10 "1978 사회경제성조사 3 및 옥수 1 서울산업대학부설주도권연구소" -1,

    1 "주택재개발의 이론과 실제" 서울: 사법행정문화원 1995

    2 "주택개량재개발 연혁연구" 서울시정개발연구원 1996

    3 "건축법규 변화에 따른 다가구주택의 특성에 관한 연구" 19 : 2003

    4 "Postmodern Urbanism" Cambridge: Blackwell 1995

    5 "A case study of the Korean housing investment guaranty program 1971-1977" AID 1977

    6 "A Refrain with a View" 12 (12): 1999

    7 "1994 조선시대 서울의 경제생활 서울시립대학교 부설 서울학연구소"

    8 "1989 한국 도시 단독주택의 유형적 지속성과 변용성에 관한 연구"

    9 "1989 불량주택개량사업 추진방안 연구" 건설부

    10 "1978 사회경제성조사 3 및 옥수 1 서울산업대학부설주도권연구소" -1,

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2025 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2020-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2019-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-10-02 학술지명변경 한글명 : 서울학연구 -> 서울학연구 KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL () KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.63 0.63 0.68
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.61 0.62 1.483 0.14
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼