건강보험 기본급여의 우선순위 = Priority-setting in Expanding the Basic Benefit Package in Korean Health Insurance Scheme

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Universal health insurance normally requires a basic benefit package, whose design intersects with almost all other aspects of the health insurance debate. Despite its central importance, basic benefit package has not received the analysis it deserves in Korea. The issue of how to decide which health services should be delivered and to whom has been a matter for consistent policy debate. Many industrialized countries observed in this study have been dealing explicitly or implicitly with the basic benefit package. The methods vary from having a specific positive list of services (Bismarkian countries) to the use of guidelines (Beveridgian countries). The purpose of this paper is to form the underlying principles and process for determining what is included or left out by getting accurate and representative responses from health-related personnel. Mail survey is used. Economic burden for treatment, seriousness of disease and urgency of treatment are ranked at the first three priorities. Services that had been suspended because of financial crisis in health insurance scheme in 2001 were selected as items which should firstly be expanded into coverage. Diagnostic test against heart disease and vaccination were also selected as items which should additionally belong to the list of covered services.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "질병위험 보장성 강화를 위한 건강보험 본인부담 구조조정 방안" 한국보건사회연구원 2003

2 "무료예방접종사업의 효율적 추진을 위한 업무개발과 정보관리 방안 연구" 국립보건원 2003

3 "근거 중심 보건의료정책 수립: 보건의료서비스의 우선순위결정과 보건목표 설정" 4 : 2001

4 "건강보험제도 발전을 위한 국민 인식도 조사연구" 국민건강보험공단 2003

5 "건강보험 재정설계 연구" 국민건강보험공단 2000

6 "건강검진ㆍ암검사 사례연구-해외출장보고서-" 국민건강보험공단 2003

7 "保險と年金の動向" 厚生統計協會 2001

8 "Towards high-performing health system" OECD 2004

9 "The public/private mix in health care, parts 1 and 2. Ottawa: national forum on health" 1995

10 "The Oregon experiment: the role of cost-benefit analysis in the allocation of medicaid funds" 45 (45): 545-554, 1997

11 "Setting Priority Again" Lønning Committee(NOU) 1997

12 "Public participation in public health decision cited from Bradley DP, Burds DA. Ethics in Public and Community Health" Routledge 2000

13 "Priority setting" HMSO(DOH) 1995

14 "Prioritization of health services: a report to the governor and the 72nd oregon legislative assembly" Oregon Health Services Commission 2003

15 "Prioritization of health services a report to the governor legislature" Oregon Health Services Commission 1991

16 "Priorities in health care: ethics, economy, implementation" Swedish Parliamentary Priorities Commission 1995

17 "Opening the debates on DALYs" 11 : 179-183, 1996

18 "OECD 기준에 따른 국민의료비의 추계를 통해 본 의약분업 전후 우리나라 의료비의 구조변화" 19 (19): 2003

19 "OECD 국가의 의료보장제도 건강보험연구센터" 건강보험연구센터 2003

20 "International perspectives on priority-setting in health care cited from Bradley DP, Burds DA. Ethics in Public and Community Health" Routledge 2000

21 "Health and health care in the Netherlands" De Tijdstroom 1997

22 "Grunddaten zur Vertragsärtztlichen Versorgung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland" 1999

23 "Government response to the first report of the health committee, Session 1994-95 Priority Setting" HMS 1995

24 "Government committee on choices in health care" governmentcommitteeonchoicesinhealthcare

25 "Defining a package of health care services the NHS is responsible for: the case for" 314 : 503-505, 1997

26 "Core services and priority-setting:the New Zealand experience" 29 : 41-60, 1994

27 "Core services" National Advisory Committee on Core Health and Disability Support Services 1995

28 "CNAMTS "