RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    명초 국제질서의 재편과 고려의 위상 = East Asian International Order Reorganized in the Early Ming Dynasty period, and the Status of Goryeo

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99784043

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The international order of East Asia shifted considerably after the foundation of the Ming dynasty in 1368. In the era of Hongmu(1368-1398), Ming was facing two international agendas. One was to revise the China-nearby relationship that had originally been established by the Mongol Yuan empire. The other was to establish new relationships with regions that had not been officially affiliated with China since the 14th century. Regions in the former category included the Mongols in the north, the Jurchens in the Northeast, polities in Central Asia s northwest, and Tibet. All these regions were connected to China by land. Regions in the latter category included regions south and east, the Southeast Asian states, Ryukyu and Japan. These regions were connected to China by sea. The Ming government sent envoys to establish diplomatic relationship with all of these regions.
    There were some characteristics shared by all the envoys that were dispatched to these regions. For envoys that would be dispatched to regions of the former category, which had prior relationships with Yuan, people who originally came from those regions, as well as merchants and Buddhist priests who had connections with those regions, were mobilized. For envoys for regions in the latter category, with which new relationships were to be attempted, eunuchs were drafted in most cases. Also, in case of the former, the Ming government wanted to utilize existing human resources and their institutional experiences inherited from Yuan, but in case of the latter, the Ming emperor wanted to use his own eunuchs. The Ming government wanted to insert all the inland regions of the former category into its military organizations(wei-so system), while other regions across the sea into the vassal states(tributary system).
    The envoys sent to Goryeo during the Hongmu era included many eunuchs who were originally from Goryeo and had been serving in the Yuan court ever since. We can see that Goryeo was a case that involved both categories. Goryeo was very much close to the Yuan court, and was also re-designated as a tributary state under Ming s authority. In other words, Goryeo was the only country that inherited a legacy in terms of its relationship with Yuan, and was also integrated into the new Ming-centric international order of East Asia.
    In the Yeong rak era, many of the envoys dispatched to foreign countries were eunuchs who had come to China from those very countries. We can see that the Hongmu era practice became a diplomatic convention for the Ming government in subsequent periods.
    번역하기

    The international order of East Asia shifted considerably after the foundation of the Ming dynasty in 1368. In the era of Hongmu(1368-1398), Ming was facing two international agendas. One was to revise the China-nearby relationship that had originally...

    The international order of East Asia shifted considerably after the foundation of the Ming dynasty in 1368. In the era of Hongmu(1368-1398), Ming was facing two international agendas. One was to revise the China-nearby relationship that had originally been established by the Mongol Yuan empire. The other was to establish new relationships with regions that had not been officially affiliated with China since the 14th century. Regions in the former category included the Mongols in the north, the Jurchens in the Northeast, polities in Central Asia s northwest, and Tibet. All these regions were connected to China by land. Regions in the latter category included regions south and east, the Southeast Asian states, Ryukyu and Japan. These regions were connected to China by sea. The Ming government sent envoys to establish diplomatic relationship with all of these regions.
    There were some characteristics shared by all the envoys that were dispatched to these regions. For envoys that would be dispatched to regions of the former category, which had prior relationships with Yuan, people who originally came from those regions, as well as merchants and Buddhist priests who had connections with those regions, were mobilized. For envoys for regions in the latter category, with which new relationships were to be attempted, eunuchs were drafted in most cases. Also, in case of the former, the Ming government wanted to utilize existing human resources and their institutional experiences inherited from Yuan, but in case of the latter, the Ming emperor wanted to use his own eunuchs. The Ming government wanted to insert all the inland regions of the former category into its military organizations(wei-so system), while other regions across the sea into the vassal states(tributary system).
    The envoys sent to Goryeo during the Hongmu era included many eunuchs who were originally from Goryeo and had been serving in the Yuan court ever since. We can see that Goryeo was a case that involved both categories. Goryeo was very much close to the Yuan court, and was also re-designated as a tributary state under Ming s authority. In other words, Goryeo was the only country that inherited a legacy in terms of its relationship with Yuan, and was also integrated into the new Ming-centric international order of East Asia.
    In the Yeong rak era, many of the envoys dispatched to foreign countries were eunuchs who had come to China from those very countries. We can see that the Hongmu era practice became a diplomatic convention for the Ming government in subsequent periods.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 머리말
    • 1. 하나의 교집합 : 고려 출신 환관 사신
    • 2. 두 개의 부분집합 : 현지출신자, 혹은 환관 사신
    • 3. 홍무 연간의 국제질서 재편과 사신 인선의 특징
    • 맺음말
    • 머리말
    • 1. 하나의 교집합 : 고려 출신 환관 사신
    • 2. 두 개의 부분집합 : 현지출신자, 혹은 환관 사신
    • 3. 홍무 연간의 국제질서 재편과 사신 인선의 특징
    • 맺음말
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 孫衛國, "論明初的宦官外交" (2) : 1994

    2 구범진, "청나라, 키메라의 제국" 민음사 2012

    3 구범진, "이문 역주" 세창출판사 2012

    4 정동훈, "명대의 예제 질서에서 조선국왕의 위상" 한국역사연구회 (84) : 251-292, 2012

    5 曺永祿, "鮮初의 朝鮮出身 明使考" 14 : 1990

    6 鄭求先, "鮮初 朝鮮出身 明 私臣의 行蹟" 23 : 2004

    7 鄭東勳, "高麗-明 外交文書 書式의 성립과 배경" 56 : 2010

    8 張存武, "說明代宦官" 大立出版社 2 : 1984

    9 孫衛國, "試說明代的行人" (1) : 1994

    10 구범진, "淸의 朝鮮使行 人選과 ‘大淸帝國體制’" 인문학연구원 (59) : 179-228, 2008

    1 孫衛國, "論明初的宦官外交" (2) : 1994

    2 구범진, "청나라, 키메라의 제국" 민음사 2012

    3 구범진, "이문 역주" 세창출판사 2012

    4 정동훈, "명대의 예제 질서에서 조선국왕의 위상" 한국역사연구회 (84) : 251-292, 2012

    5 曺永祿, "鮮初의 朝鮮出身 明使考" 14 : 1990

    6 鄭求先, "鮮初 朝鮮出身 明 私臣의 行蹟" 23 : 2004

    7 鄭東勳, "高麗-明 外交文書 書式의 성립과 배경" 56 : 2010

    8 張存武, "說明代宦官" 大立出版社 2 : 1984

    9 孫衛國, "試說明代的行人" (1) : 1994

    10 구범진, "淸의 朝鮮使行 人選과 ‘大淸帝國體制’" 인문학연구원 (59) : 179-228, 2008

    11 欒凡, "明朝對中朝朝貢的組織管理及其影響" 33 (33): 2007

    12 전순동, "明朝 前期 宦官 勢力의 推移와 機能" 중국사학회 (61) : 39-82, 2009

    13 李新峰, "明前期赴朝鮮使臣叢考" 4 : 2004

    14 刁書仁, "明前期明朝向朝鮮索征的“別貢”" (3) : 2009

    15 전순동, "明初 宦官의 外交 活動 實態와 그 特性" 중국사학회 77 (77): 109-155, 2012

    16 檀上寬, "明代「海禁」の實像-海禁=朝貢システムの創設とその展開, In 港町と海域世界" 靑木書店 2005

    17 徐玉虎, "明代琉球王國對外關係之硏究" 臺灣學生書局 1980

    18 河內良弘, "明代女眞史の硏究" 同朋舍出版 1992

    19 李登峰, "明代行人司與行人考" (1) : 2002

    20 彭蕙, "明代洪武年間出使南洋使節硏究" (1) : 2004

    21 葉泉宏, "明代前期中韓國交之硏究(一三六八-一四八八)" 臺灣商務印書館 1990

    22 孟憲堯, "明代出使朝鮮使臣類型探討" 31 (31): 2012

    23 孫衛國, "明代使臣述論" (2) : 1992

    24 鄭樑生, "明·日關係史の硏究" 雄山閣 1984

    25 劉喜濤, "封貢關系視角下明代中朝使臣往來硏究" 東北師範大學校 2011

    26 李龍範, "奇皇后의 册立과 元代의 資政院" 17 : 1962

    27 田中健夫, "中世における明·朝鮮·琉球との關係, In 對外關係と文化交流" 思文閣出版 1982

    28 杉山正明, "クビライの挑戰-モンゴル海上帝國への道" 朝日新聞社 1995

    29 Morris Rossabi, "Two Ming Envoys to Inner Asia" 62 (62): 1976

    30 Henry Serruys, "The Mongols in China During the Hung-wu Period(1368~1398)" l'Institut Belge des Hautes Etudes Chinoises 1959

    31 Morris Rossabi, "The Ming and Inner Asia" 8 : 1998

    32 David M. Robinson, "The Ming Court and the Legacy of the Yuan Mongols, In Culture, Courtiers, and Competition : The Ming Court(1368-1644)" Harvard University Press 2008

    33 Shih-shan Henry Tsai, "The Eunuchs in the Ming Dynasty" State University of New York Press 1996

    34 Henry Serruys, "Sino-J-ürčed Relations During the Yung-lo Period(1403~1424)" Otto Harrassowitz 1955

    35 Henry Serruys, "Remains of Mongol Customs in China During the Early Ming Period" 16 (16): 1957

    36 Wang Gungwu, "Ming Foreign Relations: Southeast Asia" 8 : 1998

    37 Wang Gungwu, "Early Ming Relations with Southeast Asia: A Background Essay, In Community and Nation: Essays on Southeast Asia and the Chinese" Heinemamn Educational Books 1981

    38 Mark Mancall, "China at the Center: 300 Years of Foreign Policy" The Free Press 1984

    39 Weirong Shen, "Accommodating Barbarians From Afar: Political and Cultural Interactions Between Ming China and Tibet" 56 : 2007

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-10-05 학술지명변경 한글명 : 역사와 현실 -> 역사와 현실
    외국어명 : 미등록 -> YŎKSA WA HYŎNSIL
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1998-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.91 0.91 0.87
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.87 0.92 1.68 0.36
    더보기
    해외이동버튼