『고려국신조대장교정별록(高麗國新雕大藏校正別錄)』의 교감(校勘) 유형과 성격 = The Revise type and Personality in the `Koryokukshinjodaechangkyochongbyollock( 高麗國新雕大藏校正別錄)`

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study had been discussed with two ways about `Koryokukshinjodaechangkyochongbyollock`. By collecting existing research, `Koryokukshinjodaechangkyochongbyollock` is recognized the top of a revised scriptures. Various perception and method will build the foundation which strengthen understanding of `Koryokukshinjodaechangkyochongbyollock`.
However, following of the research, irrational case of research must be complemented. And comparison of the revised scriptures between `Koryokukshinjodaechangkyochongbyollock` and Tripitaka Koreana is necessary for study. Also, joint research with Historiography, Buddhology and bibliography must go ahead to encourage study of `Koryokukshinjodaechangkyochongbyollock`.
This is a part of author and translator who had included in scriptures `Koryokukshinjodaechangkyochongbyollock` as well as Dogam(都監) and period when it carved. The revised scriptures of `Koryokukshinjodaechangkyochongbyollock` was not processed for the whole of scriptures but for scriptures which is brought up problem. It is supposed to made by using Tripitaka Koreana`s list in the process of comparison with some scriptures. Revising of `Koryokukshinjodaechangkyochongbyollock` is mutually associated with its carving, so it efficiently went along with Daejangdogam(大 藏都監).
`Agrapradipadharanividyaraja(最勝燈王如來經)` and `Suvarnasaptati (金七十論)` -Scriptures which is the revising object in `Koryokukshinjodaechangkyochongbyollock`- is out of the ordinary. `Agrapradipadharanividyaraja` was later than another revised scriptures and `Suvarnasaptati` was confirmed not Buddhism scriptures.
`Agrapradipadharanividyaraja` was nonexistent in Song dynasty`s Tripitaka, however it was discovered in Liao Dynasty`s Tripitaka when Tripitaka Koreana was carved and added to Tripitaka Koreana. Tripita Koreana and part which added to `Koryokukshinjodaechangkyochongbyollock` respectively were same edition. But `Agrapradipadharanividyaraja` of the Tripitaka Koreana was carved in King Gojong 33 year, but `Agrapradipadharanividyaraja` of the `Koryokukshinjodaechangkyochongbyollock` was carved in King Gojong 34 year and different technicians conducted. In other words, it was added to Tripitaka Koreana additionally. To separate this, it was designed to if something had wrong letters, it could be marked `DanBon(丹本)` behind the first section and last section in the scripture`s name and small letter `丹(Dan)` behind Ham(函) to be revised.
`Suvarnasaptati` was not authentical Buddhism scriptures by comparison of the East Asia (Song, Goryeo, Liao Dynasty)`s Tripitaka. But it was added to Tripitaka Koreana. We can presume Reviser like monk Sugi(守其) had conducted the revising prudently.
Finally, Reviser of Tripitaka Koreana had a continuous interest to Tripitaka where located in East Asia and studied. They compared with various type of Tripitaka and added as well Certain nation`s system and list in the revising to Tripitaka Koreana. So this organization was not behind the times and not standardized but it showed operation with mutual and flexible process situationally.