I studied whether contents of Korea language curriculums, related to ``nature of Korean language``, are well embodied in Korean Language Textbook. And then I examined how teacher`s guidebooks and textbooks explain the contents. The following are my fi...
I studied whether contents of Korea language curriculums, related to ``nature of Korean language``, are well embodied in Korean Language Textbook. And then I examined how teacher`s guidebooks and textbooks explain the contents. The following are my findings.: Firstly, in the chapter, ``We know that Korean language is used creatively.``, the relation between ``creativity of language`` and learning substances of the connected units is not organized. Secondly, even though the contents in the curriculum manual, ``We know that there is rules in a language.``, are set up considered with grammatical rules, practically, there are more phonetic rules than grammatical rules in the substance of elementary school study. In addition, there is nothing about grammatical rules in the unit which is supposed to be composed of curricular substance, ``We know that there is rules in a language. As the result of searching the parts related to the content, ``We know that language is a sort of sign``, I also found that there`s no unit related to the substance, In view of the results so far achieved, we can see some certain problems in Korean Language Elementary school Textbook. I hope that this study is helpful to recognize and correct them, and furthermore, useful to make new curriculums, textbooks, and teacher`s guidebooks.