일제치하에서 계엄법 = The Martial Law under the Japanese Imperialism

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Material Law a nation`s emergency competence has worked out as a means in history to maintain national peace and social order. Such function and values are still valid nowadays, and the basic aim of the law is not defaced. and This paper is about The Martial Law under the Japanese Imperialism. Material law has security and meaning for maintain public order of the country when the country is dangerous. Martial law is the imposition of military rule by military authorities over designated regions on an emergency basis-(usually) only temporary-when the civilian government or civilian authorities fail to function effectively, when there are extensive riots and protests, or when the disobedience of the law becomes widespread. In most cases, military forces are deployed to subdue the crowds, to secure government buildings and key or sensitive locations, and to maintain order. Generally, military personnel replace civil authorities and perform some or all of their functions. In full-scale martial law, the highest-ranking military officer would take over, or be installed, as the military governor or as head of the government, thus removing all power from the previous executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government. Martial law has also been imposed during conflicts and in cases of occupations, where the absence of any other civil government provides for an unstable population. Examples of this form of military rule include post World War II reconstruction in Germany and Japan as well as the southern reconstruction following the U.S. Civil War. Typically, the imposition of martial law accompanies curfews, the suspension of civil law, civil rights, habeas corpus, and the application or extension of military law or military justice to civilians. Civilians defying martial law may be subjected to military tribunal.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Constitutional Rights of Servicemen Before Courts-Martial,

2 임덕규, "현행 국방관계 법령의 전시 시행에 관한 제 문제점 연구" 육사 화랑대연구소 1998

3 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2011

4 김철수, "헌법학개론" 박영사 2011

5 성낙인, "헌법학" 法文社 2012

6 김기범, "헌법상의 계엄조항에 있어서의 문제점" 법조협회 17 (17): 1968

7 허영, "한국헌법론" 박영사 2011

8 문홍주, "한국헌법" 해엄사 1987

9 김기범, "한국에 있어서의 국가긴급권" 9 : 1972

10 김도창, "영미 계엄제도"

11 김기범, "영국에 있어서의 국가긴급권" 2 : 1972

12 이혜광, "비상계엄하의 군법회의 재판권" 공군본부 5 : 1986

13 김도창, "비상계엄 해제후 군법회의 재판권 연장의 위헌성 여부"

14 김도창, "불ㆍ독의 계엄제도" 7 (7): 1965

15 김기범, "독일에 있어서의 국가긴급권" 6 : 1969

16 육군사관학교, "군사법원론" 일신사 2000

17 김영휴, "국가긴급권에 관한 연구, In 조선대사회과학연구" 1982

18 李銀模, "국가긴급권에 관한 비교법적 연구 : 독일·불란서·영국·미국을 中心으로" 延世大學校 大學院 1978

19 김도창, "국가긴급권론" 청운사 1972

20 이상철, "국가 위기관리 법규에 관한 연구" 육사 화랑대연구소 1998

21 유현석, "구 계엄법 제23조 제2항은 위헌인가" (108) : 1985

22 양건, "계엄해제후 군사재판권 연기규정의 위헌성, In 경사 이회창선생 화갑기념논문집" 박영사 1995

23 조용호, "계엄하의 군사재판권" 공군본부 1 : 1982

24 황형모, "계엄지역 군무이탈죄의 문제점 소고" 1 : 1982

25 이상철, "계엄의 통치행위여부와 사법심사가능성" 45 : 1993

26 김도창, "계엄에 관한 약간의 고찰" 6 (6): 1964

27 서원우, "계엄선포전의 행위에 대한 군법회의 재판권" (139) :

28 오병헌, "계엄법의 기원과 문제점" 한국사법행정학회 1994

29 김도창, "계엄론" 박영사 1968

30 윤대해, "계엄군사법원의 재판권" 7 (7): 2003

31 정종학, "계엄ㆍ비상조치와 사법적 통제" 국가고시학회 1986

32 김기범, "계엄" 국가고시학회 1967

33 鄭政夫, "大統領의 戰時權限의 限界에 관한 硏究: 美國 憲法을 中心으로" 동아대학교 대학원 1984

34 檜山武夫, "大統領の戰時權限: 戒嚴の布告および人身保護令狀停止の要件, In ジュリスト臨時增刊, 英美判例百選" 有斐閣 1964

35 李香美, "國家緊急權의 比較法的 考察" 慶北大學校 敎育大學院 1989

36 Karl Loewenstein, "Verfassungslehre, 2. Auflage, J.C.B. Mohr T?bingen"

37 Clinton Rossiter, "The American Presidency" Brace and Company 1956

38 Karl Loewenstein, "Political Power and the Governmental Process" The University of Chicago Press 1965

39 "Martial law and the new society in the Philippines / Philippines, In Supreme Court" Supreme Court of the Philippines 1976

40 Wiener, Frederick Bernays, "Harvard Law Review Association"

41 "Courts-Martial and the Constitution: The Original Understanding / Harvard law reivew v.71, no.2"

42 "Courts-Martial and the Bill of Rights: The Original Practice: Ⅱ / Harvard law reivew v.72, no.2"

43 "Courts - Martial and the Bill of Rights: The Original Practice: Harvard law reivew v.72, no.1"

44 Clinton Rossiter, "Constitutional Dictatorship" reprinted in New York 1963

45 Bishop Jr., "Columbia Law Review Association"

46 "Civilian Judges and Military Justice: Collateral Review of Court-Martial Convictions"

47 "Civilian Court Review of Court Martial Adjudications"

48 최기철, "1980년 계엄당국의 강박에 의한 계약의 효력" 고려대학교 2002