RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      노인의 임상시험 참여에 대한 현황과 향후 발전 방향 : 임상시험 전문가를 대상으로 한 설문조사 분석 = Current State and Future Improvement of the Elderly Participation in Clinical Trials

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104556309

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: Clinical trials are widely used to approve the efficacy and discover adverse reactions of new drugs. However, there has been much concern about the unjustified exclusion of the older adults in clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to assess ageism in clinical trials and to find solution to any discovered discrimination.
      Methods: An online questionnaire was completed by 1,650 experts including doctors, pharmaceutical staff, and contract research organization members. An offline inquiry was conducted by 250 experienced professors from a single tertiary hospital and other allied professions. The questions covered the current state of elderly participation, possible reasons for under-representation, and plans for its solution.
      Results: Among 1,900 subjects, 246 (12.9%) individuals completed the survey. We excluded the six subjects who did not answer more than 10 questions, and analyzed the remaining 240 respondents. They agreed that there are tendencies to exclude the aged from clinical trials (69.2%), and that under-representation would cause difficulties for doctors and geriatric patients. Most people (84.6%) thought that treating older adults with the results from trials which exclude aged participants is inappropriate. Because respondents had difficulties explaining the trial process and obtaining informed consent, they thought establishing a geriatric clinical trial team would be highly effective. Experts also believed that financial inducements and legal regulations are required to increase elderly enrollment.
      Conclusion: Because the elderly have a unique physiology, the participation of older adults in clinical research is indispensable for verifying efficacy and determining potential adverse reactions. Consequently, clinical research professionals should be concerned about the participation of older subjects, and the authorities must begin to care about age discrimination in research fields.
      번역하기

      Background: Clinical trials are widely used to approve the efficacy and discover adverse reactions of new drugs. However, there has been much concern about the unjustified exclusion of the older adults in clinical trials. The purpose of this study was...

      Background: Clinical trials are widely used to approve the efficacy and discover adverse reactions of new drugs. However, there has been much concern about the unjustified exclusion of the older adults in clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to assess ageism in clinical trials and to find solution to any discovered discrimination.
      Methods: An online questionnaire was completed by 1,650 experts including doctors, pharmaceutical staff, and contract research organization members. An offline inquiry was conducted by 250 experienced professors from a single tertiary hospital and other allied professions. The questions covered the current state of elderly participation, possible reasons for under-representation, and plans for its solution.
      Results: Among 1,900 subjects, 246 (12.9%) individuals completed the survey. We excluded the six subjects who did not answer more than 10 questions, and analyzed the remaining 240 respondents. They agreed that there are tendencies to exclude the aged from clinical trials (69.2%), and that under-representation would cause difficulties for doctors and geriatric patients. Most people (84.6%) thought that treating older adults with the results from trials which exclude aged participants is inappropriate. Because respondents had difficulties explaining the trial process and obtaining informed consent, they thought establishing a geriatric clinical trial team would be highly effective. Experts also believed that financial inducements and legal regulations are required to increase elderly enrollment.
      Conclusion: Because the elderly have a unique physiology, the participation of older adults in clinical research is indispensable for verifying efficacy and determining potential adverse reactions. Consequently, clinical research professionals should be concerned about the participation of older subjects, and the authorities must begin to care about age discrimination in research fields.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Guyatt GH., "Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group" 270 : 2598-2601, 1993

      2 Guyatt GH., "Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature : XXV. Evidence-based medicine : principles for applying the Users’ Guides to patient care. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group" 284 : 1290-1296, 2000

      3 Cruz-Jentoft AJ., "Upper age limits in studies submitted to a research ethics committee" 22 : 175-178, 2010

      4 Bayer A., "Unjustified exclusion of elderly people from studies submitted to research ethics committee for approval : descriptive study" 321 : 992-993, 2000

      5 McMurray JJ., "Treatment of heart failure with spironolactone : trial and tribulations" 351 : 526-528, 2004

      6 Britton A., "Threats to applicability of randomised trials : exclusions and selective participation" 4 : 112-121, 1999

      7 Cherubini A., "The persistent exclusion of older patients from ongoing clinical trials regarding heart failure" 171 : 550-556, 2011

      8 Gurwitz JH., "The exclusion of the elderly and women from clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction" 268 : 1417-1422, 1992

      9 Pitt B., "The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators" 341 : 709-717, 1999

      10 Temple R., "The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics" Oxford University Press 577-588, 2011

      1 Guyatt GH., "Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group" 270 : 2598-2601, 1993

      2 Guyatt GH., "Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature : XXV. Evidence-based medicine : principles for applying the Users’ Guides to patient care. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group" 284 : 1290-1296, 2000

      3 Cruz-Jentoft AJ., "Upper age limits in studies submitted to a research ethics committee" 22 : 175-178, 2010

      4 Bayer A., "Unjustified exclusion of elderly people from studies submitted to research ethics committee for approval : descriptive study" 321 : 992-993, 2000

      5 McMurray JJ., "Treatment of heart failure with spironolactone : trial and tribulations" 351 : 526-528, 2004

      6 Britton A., "Threats to applicability of randomised trials : exclusions and selective participation" 4 : 112-121, 1999

      7 Cherubini A., "The persistent exclusion of older patients from ongoing clinical trials regarding heart failure" 171 : 550-556, 2011

      8 Gurwitz JH., "The exclusion of the elderly and women from clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction" 268 : 1417-1422, 1992

      9 Pitt B., "The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators" 341 : 709-717, 1999

      10 Temple R., "The Oxford textbook of clinical research ethics" Oxford University Press 577-588, 2011

      11 Townsley CA., "Systematic review of barriers to the recruitment of older patients with cancer onto clinical trials" 23 : 3112-3124, 2005

      12 Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service., "Statistics of total medical expenses: 2008-2012" Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service 2012

      13 Juurlink DN., "Rates of hyperkalemia after publication of the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study" 351 : 543-551, 2004

      14 Statistics Korea., "Population projections for Korea: 2010-2060" Statistics Korea 2011

      15 Son Y., "Points to consider in the evaluation of biopharmaceuticals : review of quality control" 1 : 15-23, 2006

      16 Fudge N., "Involving older people in health research" 36 : 492-500, 2007

      17 Barron JS., "Informed consent for research participation in frail older persons" 16 : 79-85, 2004

      18 McMurdo ME., "Including older people in clinical research" 331 : 1036-1037, 2005

      19 Food and Drug Administration., "Guideline for the study of drugs likely to be used in the elderly" Food and Drug Administration

      20 Working Group on Functional Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials., "Functional outcomes for clinical trials in frail older persons : time to be moving" 63 : 160-164, 2008

      21 Cherubini A., "Fighting against age discrimination in clinical trials" 58 : 1791-1796, 2010

      22 Bugeja G., "Exclusion of elderly people from clinical research : a descriptive study of published reports" 315 : 1059-, 1997

      23 Van Spall HG., "Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals : a systematic sampling review" 297 : 1233-1240, 2007

      24 Mo SH., "Decision-making power of the elderly in the family" 11 : 50-60, 1991

      25 Greenlee RT., "Cancer statistics, 2000" 50 : 7-33, 2000

      26 Johnson CL., "A longitudinal study of family supports to impaired elderly" 23 : 612-618, 1983

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-09-02 학술지명변경 한글명 : 노인병 -> Annals of geriatric medicine and research
      외국어명 : Journal of Geriatric Medicine and Research -> Annals of geriatric medicine and research
      KCI등재
      2016-07-12 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of The korean Geriatrics Society -> Journal of Geriatric Medicine and Research KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.27 0.27 0.29
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.4 0.39 0.678 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼