RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    토론 지도의 원리와 실제 ; 매크로 토론(Macro Debate)을 활용한 CEDA 방식 토론 교육 = Debate Education of CEDA Method Using Macro Debate Based Learning(MDBL)

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82648971

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In the CEDA(Cross Examination Debate Association) debating model, students make active use of listening and writing skills in accordance with the procedures. The listeners and the speakers reach a compromise and create a meaning through the debating model. I have designed the ``Micro Debate`` and the ``Macro Debate`` method as the teaching and learning methodology of the CEDA debating model. The Micro Debate model let students learn the procedures of debate from the curtailed CEDA debating model where each step is reduced to 10 minutes. The Macro Debate model is combination of the CEDA model and the text based debate that Koreans prefer. This study suggests the Macro Debate which is based on what is called ``marathon discussion`` of Lee Hwang and Lee Yee of Chosun Dynasty. They wrote 9 letters of debate to each other for 8 years. In the Micro Debate, the real debate is reduced to show the procedures of discussion. On the other hand, the Macro Debate is an extended form which is based on text. It is designed for students to learn the basic principles of argumentation and refutation. This study is significant because it represents a specific learning model for acquiring high level argumentation method of the CEDA, confirming the effectiveness of it.
    번역하기

    In the CEDA(Cross Examination Debate Association) debating model, students make active use of listening and writing skills in accordance with the procedures. The listeners and the speakers reach a compromise and create a meaning through the debating m...

    In the CEDA(Cross Examination Debate Association) debating model, students make active use of listening and writing skills in accordance with the procedures. The listeners and the speakers reach a compromise and create a meaning through the debating model. I have designed the ``Micro Debate`` and the ``Macro Debate`` method as the teaching and learning methodology of the CEDA debating model. The Micro Debate model let students learn the procedures of debate from the curtailed CEDA debating model where each step is reduced to 10 minutes. The Macro Debate model is combination of the CEDA model and the text based debate that Koreans prefer. This study suggests the Macro Debate which is based on what is called ``marathon discussion`` of Lee Hwang and Lee Yee of Chosun Dynasty. They wrote 9 letters of debate to each other for 8 years. In the Micro Debate, the real debate is reduced to show the procedures of discussion. On the other hand, the Macro Debate is an extended form which is based on text. It is designed for students to learn the basic principles of argumentation and refutation. This study is significant because it represents a specific learning model for acquiring high level argumentation method of the CEDA, confirming the effectiveness of it.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼