중등 예비 화학교사의 해결자·청취자 활동을 통한 지필평가 문항 제작 과정에서 언어적 행동 및 상호작용 = Verbal Behaviors and Interactions in Processes of Making Written Test Items Using Paired Think Aloud Problem Solving for Pre-Service Secondary Chemistry Teachers

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study investigated verbal behaviors and interactions in the processes of making written test items using paired think aloud problem solving for pre-service secondary chemistry teachers. The processes of making written test items using paired think-aloud problem solving in four small groups consisting of two pre-service chemistry teachers were recorded and transcribed. The analysis of the results revealed that ‘item making’ for ten subcategories for solver’s verbal behaviors were most frequently exhibited regardless of ‘integration’ among the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). The solver’s ‘provide’, ‘modify’, ‘require agreement’, ‘ask’, ‘agree’, and ‘justify’ were also frequently exhibited although fewer than ‘item making’. Especially, the solver’s ‘ask’ was more frequently used in ‘non-integration’, whereas ‘justify’ was more frequently used in ‘integration’. In listener’s verbal behaviors consisted of eight subcategories, ‘point out’, ‘ask’, and ‘agree’ were frequently exhibited regardless of ‘integration’. Listener’s ‘ask’ and ‘agree’ were exhibited more in ‘non-integration’, whereas ‘point out’ was exhibited more in ‘integration’. Many verbal interactions were analyzed to be in ‘symmetrical type’ more than ‘solver-dominant type’ or ‘listener-dominant type’. ‘Symmetrical type’ was also more frequently exhibited in ‘integration’, whereas ‘solver-dominant type’ was more frequently exhibited in ‘non-integration’. There were little differences between ‘integration’ and ‘non-integration’ in ‘listener-dominant type’. In 23 subcategories of ‘symmetrical type’, ‘ask-provide’ and ‘point out-justify’ were most frequently found. Especially, ‘ask-provide’ was more frequently found in ‘non-integration’, whereas ‘point out-justify’ was more frequently found in ‘integration’. ‘Point out-modify’ was the most frequent in 4 subcategories of ‘listener-dominant type’, while ‘item making-agree’ in three subcategories of ‘solver-dominant type’ regardless of ‘integration’. However, only a little of other subcategories of the three types were found.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김신영, "현장교사의 평가전문성 연구" 한국교육평가학회 15 (15): 67-85, 2002

2 박재성, "해결자⋅청취자 활동이 예비 화학교사의 지필평가 문항 제작 과정에서 고려된 교과교육학 지식(PCK) 구성 요소 사이의 상호작용에 미치는 영향" 한국과학교육학회 37 (37): 429-440, 2017

3 노태희, "해결자·청취자 활동에서의 언어적 상호작용: 성취도에 의한 소집단별 특성 비교" 대한화학회 47 (47): 519-529, 2003

4 고민석, "초등학교 교사의 탐구에 대한 신념과 과학과 수행평가의 실제" 대한지구과학교육학회 6 (6): 124-135, 2013

5 강훈식, "초등학교 교사의 과학 평가 전문성에 대한 자가진단 내용 분석" 한국초등과학교육학회 34 (34): 153-163, 2015

6 최정인, "초등학교 과학과 5, 6학년 서술형 평가문항의 행동영역 내용타당도 및 이에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석" 한국과학교육학회 36 (36): 87-101, 2016

7 노태희, "초등교사의 구성주의적 과학 평가관 및 관련 변인 탐색" 한국초등과학교육학회 28 (28): 352-360, 2009

8 주영, "중학생의 집단주의 성향에 따른 과학 협동학습에서 언어적 상호작용 양상의 비교" 한국과학교육학회 34 (34): 221-233, 2014

9 김형준, "중학생 과학탐구활동 수행평가 시 총체적 채점에서 나타나는 채점자간 불일치 유형 분석" 한국과학교육학회 32 (32): 160-181, 2012

10 박현주, "중학교 과학교사의 지필평가의 역할 및 실태에 대한인식 조사" 과학교육연구소 55 (55): 389-398, 2016

11 노태희, "중등 예비 화학교사의 지필평가 문항 제작 과정에서 고려된 교과교육학 지식(PCK) 구성 요소 사이의 상호작용" 한국과학교육학회 36 (36): 769-781, 2016

12 노태희, "중등 과학교사의 과학 평가 실태와 지향" 한국과학교육학회 35 (35): 725-733, 2015

13 최현숙, "예비 물리 교사들의 학생평가 문항 제작 수행 수준 조사 - 형성 평가를 위한 선다형 물리 개념 검사 문항 분석 중심으로" 과학교육연구소 37 (37): 458-475, 2013

14 장수미, "교사의 관심도에 기초한 초등 과학과 수행평가의 실태 분석" 한국초등과학교육학회 21 (21): 227-239, 2002

15 박현주, "과학과 행동영역에 대한 과학 교사들의 인식 조사" 한국과학교육학회 31 (31): 61-77, 2011

16 김경미, "과학과 평가 영역간의 중요도에 관한 교사들의 인식에 관한 연구" 한국과학교육학회 22 (22): 540-549, 2002

17 이은경, "과학 영재들의 학습양식에 따른 소집단 구성이 언어적 상호작용에 미치는 영향 탐색" 대한화학회 58 (58): 406-417, 2014

18 Black, P., "Working inside the black box : Assessment for learning in the classroom" 86 (86): 8-21, 2004

19 Kwon, J. -S., "Theories in science education [과학교육론]" Kyoyookbook Publication Co 2012

20 Kim, S. -W., "The study on the recognition of science teachers about the general matters of performance assessment and the appropriate performance assessment methods in middle school science curriculum" 9 (9): 213-232, 2005

21 Abell, S. K., "The professional knowledge base of science teaching" Springer 205-221, 2011

22 Aydin, S., "The nature of integration among PCK components : A case study of two experienced chemistry teachers" 14 (14): 615-624, 2013

23 Aydin, S., "The nature and development of interaction among components of pedagogical content knowledge in practicum" 46 : 37-50, 2015

24 Atjonen, P., "Teachers’ views of their assessment practice" 25 (25): 238-259, 2014

25 Shin, J., "Teachers’ needs and utilization of science performance assessment in the elementary schools" 22 (22): 18-29, 2016

26 Falk, A., "Teachers learning from professional development in elementary science : Reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogical content knowledge" 96 (96): 265-290, 2012

27 Park, S., "Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge(PCK) : PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals" 38 (38): 261-284, 2008

28 Siegel, M. A., "Preparing for the plunge : Preservice teachers’ assessment literacy" 22 (22): 371-391, 2011

29 Park, S., "Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge(PCK) : Examples from high school biology classrooms" 49 (49): 922-941, 2012

30 양일호, "Klopfer의 교육 목표 분류 체계에 의한 초등학교 과학과 지필 평가 문항 분석: 5학년 1학기를 중심으로" 한국초등과학교육학회 27 (27): 221-232, 2008

31 Brookhart, S. M., "Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers" 30 (30): 3-12, 2011

32 Min, H. J., "Development of assessment expertise model through analyzing realities of science teacher’s student assessment and teacher training" Korea National University of Education 2012

33 McMillan, J. H., "Classroom assessment : Principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction" Pearson 2014

34 Kim, H. -J., "An investigation on science teachers’ evaluation practices in the secondary schools" 20 (20): 101-111, 2000

35 Lee, I., "An exploratory study of professional standards of Korean secondary school science teacher’s assessment of students [과학과 교사의 학생 평가 전문성 신장 모형과 기준]" Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation 2004

36 Nam, M., "A study on teacher’s professional competency in students assessment (Ⅲ) [교사의 학생평가 전문성 신장 연구(Ⅲ)]" Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation 2006

37 Kim, K., "A study on management of standards-based assessment in secondary schools [중등학교의 성취평가제 운영 방안 연구]" Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation 2012