RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    지역사회 참여를 통한 미국의 재생적 개발방식 연구 -뉴욕시 아틀란틱 야드 지역혜택협약을 중심으로- = A Study on US Urban Regenerative Development Methodology by Community Participation -Focusing on Atlantic Yard Community Benefits Agreement in NYC-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99927292

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recently, There are increasing numbers of important matters on achieving regenerative values by enforcing community participation in large scale redevelopments in urban areas. Community`s participations create on development that affects themselves provides checks and balance ability to gain consideration on the people in the affected community moreover equal profit sharing as well as minimizing possibilities on social conflicts. In the long run, aims to achieve community regenerative purposes by allowing economic equality between developers & communities. Within this context, this study looks into American history regarding civil participation and resistance against urban renewal to find development of theoretical background on the issue. Then analyze Atlantic Yards community benefits agreement as an institutional application focusing on contributions by its virtuous roles with following criteria to be used as implication possibly reflected on domestic situations. (1)Community`s upward check and balance authority by direct participations (2)Provision of benefits excluded in conventional land use process (3)Provision of development project`s certainty (4)Provision of benefits have superior socio-economic values compare to negotiating with public sectors (5)Reducing public sector`s political risks and burdens (6)Creating win-win-win strategy for all three parties(Community, Developer, Government)
    번역하기

    Recently, There are increasing numbers of important matters on achieving regenerative values by enforcing community participation in large scale redevelopments in urban areas. Community`s participations create on development that affects themselves pr...

    Recently, There are increasing numbers of important matters on achieving regenerative values by enforcing community participation in large scale redevelopments in urban areas. Community`s participations create on development that affects themselves provides checks and balance ability to gain consideration on the people in the affected community moreover equal profit sharing as well as minimizing possibilities on social conflicts. In the long run, aims to achieve community regenerative purposes by allowing economic equality between developers & communities. Within this context, this study looks into American history regarding civil participation and resistance against urban renewal to find development of theoretical background on the issue. Then analyze Atlantic Yards community benefits agreement as an institutional application focusing on contributions by its virtuous roles with following criteria to be used as implication possibly reflected on domestic situations. (1)Community`s upward check and balance authority by direct participations (2)Provision of benefits excluded in conventional land use process (3)Provision of development project`s certainty (4)Provision of benefits have superior socio-economic values compare to negotiating with public sectors (5)Reducing public sector`s political risks and burdens (6)Creating win-win-win strategy for all three parties(Community, Developer, Government)

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼