RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    르네상스 휴머니즘, 과거와 현재의 교차로 = Renaissance Humanism, a Crossroad between the Past and the Present

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82434639

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Renaissance humanism is one of the most controversial terms in Renaissance studies and the general history of ideas as well. The present study is a historiographical sketch of how such a contentious concept has been interpreted through the 20th century up to now. Further more, based upon that historiographical survey, it suggests a new approach toward the better understanding of Renaissance humanism and its historical significance. By the middle of the 20th century, the three broad tendencies were already in advance and prevailed the scholarship of Renaissance intellectual history: Eugenio Garin's view that Renaissance humanism was a philosophy of man, Hans Baron's understanding of it as a social reforming movement which he labelled civic humanism, and the interpretation of it as a literary and educational movement espoused by Paul Oskar Kristeller. In a word, Garin, Baron, and Kristeller were such gigantic figures who deepened and elaborated Renaissance studies after the Second World War. But, in spite of insightful, coherent, and historicist interpretation of Renaissance humanism based upon wide and thorough archival researches, their views are in need of redirection or correction. Simply put, as exemplified in new studies about Renaissance humanism in the second half of the twentieth century by Ronald G. Witt, Robert Black, and Riccardo Fubini, three giants' interpretations were either too static or limited to a particular intellectual tendency of the times, and even more they all strived to present a meta thesis about Renaissance humanism. The present study suggests the several works of Anthony Grafton, today's one of the most prolific researchers in Renaissance studies, as new possibilities of overcoming three giants's limits. In particular, Grafton's broad interest in material cultures in general would open the new horizon of understanding Renaissance humanism. Consequently, this study argues that the best way of interpreting Renaissance humanism is to understand it as a set of textual practice mediating between a venerated antiquity and the contemporary age, and as a critical culture emerged from classical studies.
    번역하기

    Renaissance humanism is one of the most controversial terms in Renaissance studies and the general history of ideas as well. The present study is a historiographical sketch of how such a contentious concept has been interpreted through the 20th centur...

    Renaissance humanism is one of the most controversial terms in Renaissance studies and the general history of ideas as well. The present study is a historiographical sketch of how such a contentious concept has been interpreted through the 20th century up to now. Further more, based upon that historiographical survey, it suggests a new approach toward the better understanding of Renaissance humanism and its historical significance. By the middle of the 20th century, the three broad tendencies were already in advance and prevailed the scholarship of Renaissance intellectual history: Eugenio Garin's view that Renaissance humanism was a philosophy of man, Hans Baron's understanding of it as a social reforming movement which he labelled civic humanism, and the interpretation of it as a literary and educational movement espoused by Paul Oskar Kristeller. In a word, Garin, Baron, and Kristeller were such gigantic figures who deepened and elaborated Renaissance studies after the Second World War. But, in spite of insightful, coherent, and historicist interpretation of Renaissance humanism based upon wide and thorough archival researches, their views are in need of redirection or correction. Simply put, as exemplified in new studies about Renaissance humanism in the second half of the twentieth century by Ronald G. Witt, Robert Black, and Riccardo Fubini, three giants' interpretations were either too static or limited to a particular intellectual tendency of the times, and even more they all strived to present a meta thesis about Renaissance humanism. The present study suggests the several works of Anthony Grafton, today's one of the most prolific researchers in Renaissance studies, as new possibilities of overcoming three giants's limits. In particular, Grafton's broad interest in material cultures in general would open the new horizon of understanding Renaissance humanism. Consequently, this study argues that the best way of interpreting Renaissance humanism is to understand it as a set of textual practice mediating between a venerated antiquity and the contemporary age, and as a critical culture emerged from classical studies.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. 르네상스 사학사의 부활과 휴머니즘 2. 20세기 거인의 등장과 휴머니즘 해석의 갈래 3. 거인의 발자취를 쫓아, 거인의 어깨 너머에서 4. 넓어지는 연구의 지평과 르네상스 휴머니즘에 대한 새로운 이해
    • 1. 르네상스 사학사의 부활과 휴머니즘 2. 20세기 거인의 등장과 휴머니즘 해석의 갈래 3. 거인의 발자취를 쫓아, 거인의 어깨 너머에서 4. 넓어지는 연구의 지평과 르네상스 휴머니즘에 대한 새로운 이해
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김영한, "휴머니즘 in: 서양의 지적운동 Ⅱ" 지식산업사 1998

    2 앨런 블록, "서양의 휴머니즘 전통" 범양사 1989

    3 임병철, "르네상스의 문을 연 포지오의 편지 두 통 in: 서양문화사 깊이읽기" 푸른역사 149-150, 2008

    4 임병철, "르네상스, 짜여진 신화에서 파편화된 역사로" 한국사학사학회 (11) : 193-218, 2005

    5 Randolph Starn, "Who's Afraid of the Renaissance? in: The Past and Future of Medieval Studies" 129-147, 1994

    6 Anthony Grafton, "What Was History?" 2007

    7 M. L. King, "Venetian Humanism in an Age of Patrician Dominance" 1986

    8 Riccardo Fubini, "Umanesimo e Secolarizzazione da Petrarca a Valla" 1990

    9 James Hankins, "Two Twentieth-century Interpreters of Renaissance Humanism: Eugenio Garin and Paul Oskar Kristeller" 23 : 2001

    10 E. H. Gombrich, "The Renaissance: Period or Movement? in: Background to the English Renaissance" 1974

    1 김영한, "휴머니즘 in: 서양의 지적운동 Ⅱ" 지식산업사 1998

    2 앨런 블록, "서양의 휴머니즘 전통" 범양사 1989

    3 임병철, "르네상스의 문을 연 포지오의 편지 두 통 in: 서양문화사 깊이읽기" 푸른역사 149-150, 2008

    4 임병철, "르네상스, 짜여진 신화에서 파편화된 역사로" 한국사학사학회 (11) : 193-218, 2005

    5 Randolph Starn, "Who's Afraid of the Renaissance? in: The Past and Future of Medieval Studies" 129-147, 1994

    6 Anthony Grafton, "What Was History?" 2007

    7 M. L. King, "Venetian Humanism in an Age of Patrician Dominance" 1986

    8 Riccardo Fubini, "Umanesimo e Secolarizzazione da Petrarca a Valla" 1990

    9 James Hankins, "Two Twentieth-century Interpreters of Renaissance Humanism: Eugenio Garin and Paul Oskar Kristeller" 23 : 2001

    10 E. H. Gombrich, "The Renaissance: Period or Movement? in: Background to the English Renaissance" 1974

    11 Paul Oskar Kristeller, "The Renaissance in the History of Philosophical Thought in: The Renaissance: Essays in Interpretation" 128-, 1982

    12 Charles L. Stinger, "The Renaissance in Rome" 1985

    13 Wallace K. Ferguson, "The Renaissance in Historical Thoughts: Five Centuries of Interpretation" 1948

    14 Peter Burke, "The Renaissance Sense of the Past" 1969

    15 Terry Jones, "The Middle Ages of Reason: It was the medieval world that dragged us into the future, not the reactionary Renaissance"

    16 Christopher S. Celenza, "The Lost Italian Renaissance: Humanists, Historians, and Latin Legacy" 2004

    17 A. J. Grieco, "The Italian Renaissance in the 20th Century" 2002

    18 Edward Muir, "The Italian Renaissance in America" 100 : 1096-, 1995

    19 Hans Baron, "The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance: Civic Humanism and Republican Liberty in an Age of Classism and Tyranny" 1966

    20 Jacob Burckhardt, "The Civilization of the Renaissance in Italy" 1990

    21 Paul F. Grendler, "Schooling in Renaissance Italy: Literary and Learning 1300-1600" 1989

    22 Renzo Raggianto, "Rinascimento mito e conceto" Pisa 2005

    23 Carol E. Quillen, "Rereading the Renaissance: Petrarch, Augustine, and the Language of Humanism" 1998

    24 John Addington Symonds, "Renaissance in Italy, vol. I, The Revival of Learning" 2002

    25 Ervin Panofsky, "Renaissance and Renascences in Western Art" 1972

    26 Paul Oskar Kristeller, "Renaissance Thought and Its Sources" 1979

    27 Randolph Starn, "Renaissance Redux" 103 : 124-, 1998

    28 Albert Rabil Jr., "Renaissance Humanism: Foundation, Forms, and Legacy, vol. 2, Humanism beyond Italy" 1988

    29 J. F. D'Amico, "Renaissance Humanism in Papal Rome: Humanists and Churchmen on the Eve of the Reformation" 1983

    30 James Hankins, "Renaissance Civic Humanism: Reappraisal and Reflections" 2000

    31 James Hankins, "Plato in the Italian Renaissance" 1991

    32 Kenneth Gowens, "Perceiving the Past: Renaissance Humanism after th ‘Cognitive Turn'" 103 : 55-82, 1998

    33 Jonathan Woolfson, "Palgrave Advance in Renaissance Historiography" 2005

    34 Anthony Grafton, "New Worlds, Ancient Texts: The Power of Tradition and the Shock of Discovery" 1992

    35 Anthony Grafton, "Leon Battista Alberti: Master Builder of the Italian Renaissance" 2000

    36 Eugenio Garin, "La filosofia come sapere storico" 1990

    37 Riccardo Fubini, "L'umansimo Italiane e i Suoi Storici: Origini Rinascimentali-Critica Moderna" 2001

    38 Robert Black, "Italian Renaissance Education: Changing Perspectives and Continuing Controversies" 52 : 315-334, 1991

    39 Eugenio Garin, "Italian Humanism: Philosophy and Civic Life in the Renaissance" 1965

    40 Angelo Mazzocco, "Interpretations of Renaissance Humanism" Leiden 2006

    41 Ronald G. Witt, "In the Footsteps of the Ancients: The Origins of Humanism from Lovato to Bruni" 22-53, 2003

    42 Hans Baron, "In Search of Florentine Civic Humanism: Essays on the Transition from Medieval to Modern Thoughts, 2 vols" 1988

    43 Anthony Grafton, "Idem, Bring Out Your Dead: The Past and Revelation" 2001

    44 Robert Black, "Humanism and Education in Medieval and Renaissance Italy: Tradition and Innovation in Latin Schools from the Twelfth to the Fifteenth Century" 2001

    45 Paul F. Grendler, "Georg Voigt: Historian of Humanism in: Humanism and Creativity in the Italian Renaissance: Essays in Honor of Ronald G. Witt" 291-321, 2006

    46 Anthony Grafton, "From Humanism to the Humanities: Education and Liberal Arts in Fifteenth- and Sixteenth-Century Europe" 1986

    47 Anthony Grafton, "Defenders of the Texts: The Traditions of Scholarship in an Age of Science 1450-1800" 1991

    48 Anthony Grafton, "Commerce with Classics: Ancient Books and Renaissance Readers" 1997

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-04-26 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Society of History of Historiography KCI등재후보
    2005-04-10 학술지등록 한글명 : 韓國史學史學報
    외국어명 : The Korean Journal of History of Historiography
    KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.47 0.47 0.62
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.61 0.54 1.937 0.12
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼