RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Effects of dentin surface preparations on bonding of self-etching adhesives under simulated pulpal pressure

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108050613

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Objectives

    This study evaluated the effects of different smear layer preparations on the dentin permeability and microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of 2 self-etching adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond [CSE] and Clearfil Tri-S Bond Universal [CTS]) under dynamic pulpal pressure.




    Materials and Methods

    Human third molars were cut into crown segments. The dentin surfaces were prepared using 4 armamentaria: 600-grit SiC paper, coarse diamond burs, superfine diamond burs, and carbide burs. The pulp chamber of each crown segment was connected to a dynamic intra-pulpal pressure simulation apparatus, and the permeability test was done under a pressure of 15 cmH2O. The relative permeability (%P) was evaluated on the smear layer-covered and bonded dentin surfaces. The teeth were bonded to either of the adhesives under pulpal pressure simulation, and cut into sticks after 24 hours water storage for the µTBS test. The resin-dentin interface and nanoleakage observations were performed using a scanning electron microscope. Statistical comparisons were done using analysis of variance and post hoc tests.




    Results

    Only the method of surface preparation had a significant effect on permeability (p < 0.05). The smear layers created by the carbide and superfine diamond burs yielded the lowest permeability. CSE demonstrated a higher µTBS, with these values in the superfine diamond and carbide bur groups being the highest. Microscopic evaluation of the resin-dentin interface revealed nanoleakage in the coarse diamond bur and SiC paper groups for both adhesives.




    Conclusions

    Superfine diamond and carbide burs can be recommended for dentin preparation with the use of 2-step CSE.
    번역하기

    Objectives This study evaluated the effects of different smear layer preparations on the dentin permeability and microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of 2 self-etching adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond [CSE] and Clearfil Tri-S Bond Universal [CTS]) under dy...

    Objectives

    This study evaluated the effects of different smear layer preparations on the dentin permeability and microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of 2 self-etching adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond [CSE] and Clearfil Tri-S Bond Universal [CTS]) under dynamic pulpal pressure.




    Materials and Methods

    Human third molars were cut into crown segments. The dentin surfaces were prepared using 4 armamentaria: 600-grit SiC paper, coarse diamond burs, superfine diamond burs, and carbide burs. The pulp chamber of each crown segment was connected to a dynamic intra-pulpal pressure simulation apparatus, and the permeability test was done under a pressure of 15 cmH2O. The relative permeability (%P) was evaluated on the smear layer-covered and bonded dentin surfaces. The teeth were bonded to either of the adhesives under pulpal pressure simulation, and cut into sticks after 24 hours water storage for the µTBS test. The resin-dentin interface and nanoleakage observations were performed using a scanning electron microscope. Statistical comparisons were done using analysis of variance and post hoc tests.




    Results

    Only the method of surface preparation had a significant effect on permeability (p < 0.05). The smear layers created by the carbide and superfine diamond burs yielded the lowest permeability. CSE demonstrated a higher µTBS, with these values in the superfine diamond and carbide bur groups being the highest. Microscopic evaluation of the resin-dentin interface revealed nanoleakage in the coarse diamond bur and SiC paper groups for both adhesives.




    Conclusions

    Superfine diamond and carbide burs can be recommended for dentin preparation with the use of 2-step CSE.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Nagarkar S, "Universal dental adhesives: current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance" 107 : 2121-2131, 2019

    2 Saikaew P, "Ultra-morphological characteristics of dentin surfaces after different preparations and treatments" 128 : 246-254, 2020

    3 Tay FR, "Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives" 81 : 472-476, 2002

    4 Czonstkowsky M, "The smear layer in endodontics" 34 : 13-25, 1990

    5 Sherman VR, "The materials science of collagen" 52 : 22-50, 2015

    6 Oliveira SS, "The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system" 19 : 758-767, 2003

    7 Pashley DH, "The effects of acid etching on the in-vivo permeability of dentine in the dog" 28 : 555-559, 1983

    8 Saikaew P, "The effect of dentine surface preparation and reduced application time of adhesive on bonding strength" 47 : 63-70, 2016

    9 Van Landuyt KL, "Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives" 28 : 3757-3785, 2007

    10 Van Meerbeek B, "State of the art of selfetch adhesives" 27 : 17-28, 2011

    1 Nagarkar S, "Universal dental adhesives: current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance" 107 : 2121-2131, 2019

    2 Saikaew P, "Ultra-morphological characteristics of dentin surfaces after different preparations and treatments" 128 : 246-254, 2020

    3 Tay FR, "Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives" 81 : 472-476, 2002

    4 Czonstkowsky M, "The smear layer in endodontics" 34 : 13-25, 1990

    5 Sherman VR, "The materials science of collagen" 52 : 22-50, 2015

    6 Oliveira SS, "The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system" 19 : 758-767, 2003

    7 Pashley DH, "The effects of acid etching on the in-vivo permeability of dentine in the dog" 28 : 555-559, 1983

    8 Saikaew P, "The effect of dentine surface preparation and reduced application time of adhesive on bonding strength" 47 : 63-70, 2016

    9 Van Landuyt KL, "Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives" 28 : 3757-3785, 2007

    10 Van Meerbeek B, "State of the art of selfetch adhesives" 27 : 17-28, 2011

    11 Pashley DH, "Smear layer: overview of structure and function" 88 (88): 215-224, 1992

    12 Tay FR, "Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part I. Bond strength and morphologic evidence" 17 : 271-278, 2004

    13 Sattabanasuk V, "Resin-dentin bond strength as related to different surface preparation methods" 35 : 467-475, 2007

    14 Masic A, "Osmotic pressure induced tensile forces in tendon collagen" 6 : 5942-, 2015

    15 Sahin C, "In vitro permeability of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives used for immediate dentin sealing" 31 : 401-408, 2012

    16 Prati C, "Hydrostatic intrapulpal pressure and bond strength of bonding systems" 7 : 54-58, 1991

    17 Pashley DH, "Effects of the smear layer, Copalite, and oxalate on microleakage" 11 : 95-102, 1986

    18 Tay FR, "Effect of smear layers on the bonding of a self-etching primer to dentin" 2 : 99-116, 2000

    19 Tani C, "Effect of smear layer thickness on bond strength mediated by three all-in-one selfetching priming adhesives" 4 : 283-289, 2002

    20 Reis A, "Effect of smear layer thickness and acidity of self-etching solutions on early and long-term bond strength to dentin" 33 : 549-559, 2005

    21 Saikaew P, "Effect of smear layer and surface roughness on resin-dentin bond strength of self-etching adhesives" 37 : 973-980, 2018

    22 Sauro S, "Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin permeability and adhesion of self-etch adhesives" 23 : 705-713, 2007

    23 Hosaka K, "Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on all-in-one adhesive bond strengths to dentine" 35 : 207-213, 2007

    24 Moll K, "Effect of intrinsic and extrinsic moisture on bond strength to dentine" 27 : 150-165, 2000

    25 Semeraro S, "Effect of different bur grinding on the bond strength of self-etching adhesives" 31 : 317-323, 2006

    26 Carvalho AO, "Effect of adhesive system and application strategy on reduction of dentin permeability" 26 : 397-403, 2012

    27 Ciucchi B, "Dentinal fluid dynamics in human teeth, in vivo" 21 : 191-194, 1995

    28 Prati C, "Dentin morphology and permeability after brushing with different toothpastes in the presence and absence of smear layer" 73 : 183-190, 2002

    29 Pashley DH, "Dentin bonding: overview of the substrate with respect to adhesive material" 3 : 46-50, 1991

    30 Perdigão J, "Dentin bonding-variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment" 26 : e24-e37, 2010

    31 Siegel SC, "Dental cutting with diamond burs: heavy-handed or light-touch?" 8 : 3-9, 1999

    32 Yoshida Y, "Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers" 83 : 454-458, 2004

    33 Mahdan MH, "Combined effect of smear layer characteristics and hydrostatic pulpal pressure on dentine bond strength of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing adhesives" 41 : 861-871, 2013

    34 Wagner A, "Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes" 42 : 800-807, 2014

    35 Rosa WL, "Bond strength of universal adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis" 43 : 765-776, 2015

    36 Ermis RB, "Bond strength of self-etch adhesives to dentin prepared with three different diamond burs" 24 : 978-985, 2008

    37 Marchesi G, "Adhesive performance of a multi-mode adhesive system: 1-year in vitro study" 42 : 603-612, 2014

    38 Mitchem JC, "Adhesion to dentin with and without smear layer under varying degrees of wetness" 66 : 619-622, 1991

    39 do Amaral RC, "Active application improves the bonding performance of self-etch adhesives to dentin" 37 : 82-90, 2009

    40 Armstrong S, "Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using microtensile bond strength (μTBS) approach" 33 : 133-143, 2017

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2017-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.25 0.25 0.21
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.21 0.19 0.448 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼