Comparison of shaping ability of the Reciproc Blue and One Curve with or without glide path in simulated S-shaped root canals|RISS 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the impact of a glide-path on the shaping ability of 2 single-file instruments and to compare the centering ability, maintenance of original canal curvatures and area of instrumentation in simulated S-shaped root canals.

Materials and Methods

Forty simulated S-shaped root canals were used and were prepared with One Curve (group OC), One G and OC (group GOC), Reciproc Blue (group RB) and R-Pilot and RB (group PRB) and scanned before and after instrumentation. The images were analyzed using AutoCAD. After superimposing the samples, 4 levels (D1, D2, D3, and D4) and 2 angles (Δ1 and Δ2) were established to evaluate the centering ability and modification of the canal curvatures. Then, the area of instrumentation (ΔA) was measured. The data were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test for multiple comparisons (p < 0.05).

Results

Regarding the centering ability in the apical part (D3, D4), the use of the glide-path yielded better results than the single-file groups. Among the groups at D4, OC showed the worst results (p < 0.05). The OC system removed less material (ΔA) than the RB system, and for Δ1, OC yielded a worse result than RB (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The glide-path improved the centering ability in the apical part of the simulated S-shaped canals. The RB system showed a better centering ability in the apical part and major respect of the canal curvatures compared with OC system.

번역하기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

번역하기

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Berutti E, "Use of nickeltitanium rotary PathFile to create the glide path: comparison with manual preflaring in simulated root canals" 35 : 408-412, 2009

2 Zhang L, "The shaping effect of the combination of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated S-shaped canals" 34 : 456-458, 2008

3 Abu Haimed A, "The root canal shaping ability of WaveOne and Reciproc versus ProTaper Universal and Mtwo rotary NiTi systems" 7 : 8-15, 2017

4 Patiño PV, "The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments" 31 : 114-116, 2005

5 Roland DD, "The effect of preflaring on the rates of separation for 0.04 taper nickel titanium rotary instruments" 28 : 543-545, 2002

6 De-Deus G, "The ability of the Reciproc R25 instrument to reach the full root canal working length without a glide path" 46 : 993-998, 2013

7 Özyürek T, "Shaping ability of reciproc, waveone gold, and hyflex edm single-file systems in simulated s-shaped canals" 43 : 805-809, 2017

8 Bürklein S, "Shaping ability of different nickel-titanium systems in simulated S-shaped canals with and without glide path" 40 : 1231-1234, 2014

9 Keskin C, "Shaping ability of Reciproc Blue reciprocating instruments with or without glide path in simulated S-shaped root canals" 12 : 63-67, 2018

10 Bürklein S, "Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper" 45 : 449-461, 2012