RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      咸安樣式古式陶質土器의 分布定型과 意味 = A Study on the Distribution Pattern of Early-style Stoneware of the Haman-style

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104692558

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      During the Early-style Stoneware period, the Youngnam region witnessed
      the appearance of pottery similar to that intensively excavated in the Haman
      area. Various arguments representing different viewpoints have been presented
      regarding this phenomenon. Although the kilns were limited to the Haman area,
      Haman-style pottery has been found throughout the Gimhae and Busan areas. It
      is therefore possible that pottery originating in the Haman area may have moved
      into other places. This study thus aims to examine the distribution pattern of
      Haman-style pottery. It also looks into the background of this phenomena by
      identifying Haman-style pottery and by assuming its movement and influences.
      Based on changes in distribution pattern, Haman-made pottery can be
      divided into three phases. The distribution of Haman-made pottery began in the
      latter half of the 3rd century AD. Only one or two examples of paddled pottery
      with corded ware design have been identified in limited areas. In the 4th
      century, the distribution of Haman-style pottery expanded greatly in terms of
      range, quantity and type. The areas showing the distribution of this pottery type
      can be divided into 1) the East Nakdong River region (including Gimhae and
      Changwon), 2) the Southern West Nakdong River region, and 3) the Northern
      West Nakdong River region. Finally, the fourth quarter of the 4th century to the
      first quarter of the 5th century witnessed a significant decrease in terms of both
      the range and amount of pottery distributed.
      To conclude, the above changes in distribution pattern may be seen to
      directly reflect the distribution network of Haman-made pottery. In other words,
      the changing patterns of distribution represent the formation and development of
      the Haman-made pottery distribution network. The distribution network of
      Haman-made pottery was set up in the latter half of the 3rd century AD, followed by the establishment of two distribution spheres (located in the eastern area of
      Nakdong River and the southern area west of Nakdong River) in the 4th century.
      Both distribution spheres were wide reaching but each contained different
      characteristics. In the eastern area of Nakdong River, a good relationship appears
      to have been maintained between Haman and Gyeongju. In the southern area
      west of Nakdong River, it appears that Haman may have taken advantage of
      foreign trade through the Nam River and Masan Bay. Written records concerning
      “the war between eight countries which took place on the river/sea (浦上八國戰
      爭)” may be considered in reference to this, but the nature, period, and countries
      involved in this war remain unclear. The two distribution spheres continued into
      the fourth quarter of the 4th century to the first quarter of the 5th century, but
      witnessed decline in terms of the type, amount and range of pottery distributed.
      This indicates that the meaning of Haman-style pottery changed considerably at
      this time.
      번역하기

      During the Early-style Stoneware period, the Youngnam region witnessed the appearance of pottery similar to that intensively excavated in the Haman area. Various arguments representing different viewpoints have been presented regarding this phenomenon...

      During the Early-style Stoneware period, the Youngnam region witnessed
      the appearance of pottery similar to that intensively excavated in the Haman
      area. Various arguments representing different viewpoints have been presented
      regarding this phenomenon. Although the kilns were limited to the Haman area,
      Haman-style pottery has been found throughout the Gimhae and Busan areas. It
      is therefore possible that pottery originating in the Haman area may have moved
      into other places. This study thus aims to examine the distribution pattern of
      Haman-style pottery. It also looks into the background of this phenomena by
      identifying Haman-style pottery and by assuming its movement and influences.
      Based on changes in distribution pattern, Haman-made pottery can be
      divided into three phases. The distribution of Haman-made pottery began in the
      latter half of the 3rd century AD. Only one or two examples of paddled pottery
      with corded ware design have been identified in limited areas. In the 4th
      century, the distribution of Haman-style pottery expanded greatly in terms of
      range, quantity and type. The areas showing the distribution of this pottery type
      can be divided into 1) the East Nakdong River region (including Gimhae and
      Changwon), 2) the Southern West Nakdong River region, and 3) the Northern
      West Nakdong River region. Finally, the fourth quarter of the 4th century to the
      first quarter of the 5th century witnessed a significant decrease in terms of both
      the range and amount of pottery distributed.
      To conclude, the above changes in distribution pattern may be seen to
      directly reflect the distribution network of Haman-made pottery. In other words,
      the changing patterns of distribution represent the formation and development of
      the Haman-made pottery distribution network. The distribution network of
      Haman-made pottery was set up in the latter half of the 3rd century AD, followed by the establishment of two distribution spheres (located in the eastern area of
      Nakdong River and the southern area west of Nakdong River) in the 4th century.
      Both distribution spheres were wide reaching but each contained different
      characteristics. In the eastern area of Nakdong River, a good relationship appears
      to have been maintained between Haman and Gyeongju. In the southern area
      west of Nakdong River, it appears that Haman may have taken advantage of
      foreign trade through the Nam River and Masan Bay. Written records concerning
      “the war between eight countries which took place on the river/sea (浦上八國戰
      爭)” may be considered in reference to this, but the nature, period, and countries
      involved in this war remain unclear. The two distribution spheres continued into
      the fourth quarter of the 4th century to the first quarter of the 5th century, but
      witnessed decline in terms of the type, amount and range of pottery distributed.
      This indicates that the meaning of Haman-style pottery changed considerably at
      this time.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 콜린렌프류, "현대고고학의이해" 사회평론 2006

      2 洪潽植, "토기로본가야고분의전환기적양상 in: 가야와그전환기의고분문화" 국립창원문화재연구소 2006

      3 李柱憲, "토기로본安羅와新羅 in: 加耶와新羅" 김해시 1998

      4 李政根, "토기가마의조사와출토유물의정리" (재)영남문화재연구원 2008

      5 井上主稅, "왜계유물을 통해 본 금관가야 세력의 동향" 한국고고학회 57 : 125-152, 2005

      6 李熙濬, "신라고고학연구" 사회평론 2007

      7 河承哲, "스에키출현과정을통해본가야 in: 4~6세기가야·신라고분출토의외래계유물" 2007

      8 김태식, "미완의문명7백년가야사" 푸른역사 2002

      9 鄭仁盛, "낙동강유역권細形銅劍文化의전개" 慶北大學校大學院 1997

      10 申敬澈, "가야와그전환기의고분문화 in: 가야와그전환기의고분문화" 국립창원문화재연구소 2006

      1 콜린렌프류, "현대고고학의이해" 사회평론 2006

      2 洪潽植, "토기로본가야고분의전환기적양상 in: 가야와그전환기의고분문화" 국립창원문화재연구소 2006

      3 李柱憲, "토기로본安羅와新羅 in: 加耶와新羅" 김해시 1998

      4 李政根, "토기가마의조사와출토유물의정리" (재)영남문화재연구원 2008

      5 井上主稅, "왜계유물을 통해 본 금관가야 세력의 동향" 한국고고학회 57 : 125-152, 2005

      6 李熙濬, "신라고고학연구" 사회평론 2007

      7 河承哲, "스에키출현과정을통해본가야 in: 4~6세기가야·신라고분출토의외래계유물" 2007

      8 김태식, "미완의문명7백년가야사" 푸른역사 2002

      9 鄭仁盛, "낙동강유역권細形銅劍文化의전개" 慶北大學校大學院 1997

      10 申敬澈, "가야와그전환기의고분문화 in: 가야와그전환기의고분문화" 국립창원문화재연구소 2006

      11 鄭澄元, "釜山地域의古墳文化" 18 : 1994

      12 申敬澈, "金官加耶土器의編年" 伽耶文化硏究所 3 : 2000

      13 嶺南文化財硏究院, "達成汶陽里古墳群I" 嶺南文化財硏究院 2003

      14 李盛周, "辰·弁韓地域墳墓出土1~4世紀土器의編年" (24) : 1999

      15 朴天秀, "考古資料를통해본가야시기의昌寧地方 in: 가야시기창녕지방의역사·고고학적 성격" 2001

      16 朴天秀, "考古學으로본加羅國史 in: 가야각국사의재구성" 혜안 2000

      17 金正完, "筒形高杯再考 in: 石軒정징원교수정년퇴임기념논총" 2006

      18 金龍星, "第3章考察 in: 慶山林堂地域古墳群VI-林堂2號賁" 2002

      19 曺秀鉉, "火焰形透窓土器 硏究" 한국고고학회 (59) : 38-73, 2006

      20 朴光烈, "漆谷深川洞出土古式陶質土器에對한一考察" 38 : 1991

      21 慶南文化財硏究院, "梁山所土里古墳群" 2006

      22 金周龍, "昌原地域古墳의推移와性格" 釜山大學校大學院 2007

      23 李盛周, "新羅·加耶社會의起源과成長" 學硏文化社 1998

      24 崔夢龍, "新羅·伽耶土器의生産과分配에관한硏究" (18) : 1995

      25 李凡泓, "斯盧國地域의3~4世紀代土器硏究" 東亞大學校大學院 1992

      26 李盛周, "打捺文土器의展開와陶質土器發生" 42 : 2000

      27 金斗喆, "打捺技法의硏究-金海禮安里遺蹟出土品을中心으로-" (28) : 2001

      28 申東昭, "嶺南地方原三國時代鐵斧와鐵矛의分布定型硏究" 慶北大學校大學院 2007

      29 金相哲, "宜寧地域加耶文化에관한一考察" 慶尙大學校大學院 2007

      30 남재우, "安羅國史" 혜안 2003

      31 鄭朱喜, "咸安樣式古式陶質土器의 分布定型에 관한 硏究" 慶北大學校 2008

      32 國立金海博物館, "咸安宇巨里土器生産遺蹟" 2007

      33 李政根, "咸安地域古式陶質土器의生産과流通" 嶺南大學校大學院 2006

      34 김재철, "古式陶質土器의性格에대한再論-최근의조사성과를바탕으로-" 3 : 2006

      35 安在晧, "古式陶質土器에관한약간의考察" (1) : 1986

      36 朴普鉉, "古式陶質土器로본4世紀代의慶州" 7 : 1999

      37 金榮珉, "加耶地域有刺利器의性格과意味 in: 耶의精神世界" 金海市 2007

      38 李盛周, "伽耶土器生産·分配體系 in: 가야고고학의새로운조명" 혜안 2003

      39 安在晧, "三韓時代後期瓦質土器의編年" (14) : 1994

      40 安在晧, "VI. 考察 in: 金海禮安里古墳郡II(本文)" 釜山大學校博物館 1993

      41 李在賢, "IV. 考察-4世紀代福泉洞木槨墓의諸樣相 in: 東萊福泉洞古墳群III" 釜山大學校博物館 1996

      42 李政根, "IV. 考察 in: 咸安宇巨里土器生産遺蹟" 金海博物館 2007

      43 朱甫暾, "4~5세기釜山地域의政治的向方 in: 가야사복원을위한복천동고분군의재조명" 1997

      44 尹溫植, "3세기대동해남부지역토기양식의형성과변천" 慶北大學校大學院 2001

      45 朴廣春, "3~4世紀에있어伽耶土器地域色硏究" (19) : 1995

      46 禹枝南, "2.咸安地域出土陶質土器 in: 道項里·末山里遺蹟" 慶南考古學硏究所遺蹟發掘調査報告書 2002

      47 河承哲, "2. 진주 안간리출토고식도질토기에 대한일고찰 inL 晋州安間里遺蹟" 慶南發展硏究院歷史文化센터 2008

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2018-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.49 1.49 1.24
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.32 1.4 2.51 0.36
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼