RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    정비구역 해제지역의 인구 및 가구 특성 변화 -서울 (구)중화재정비촉진2지구를 대상으로- = Changes in the Characteristics of Populations and Households in Areas Canceled from the Improvement Zone for Housing Redevelopment - For the Former Junghwa Urban Renewal Acceleration 2nd District in Seoul -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108816865

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    (Background and Purpose) Since 2002, the number of improvement zones for housing redevelopment projects has increased due to the New Town Project. As the real estate market fell after the 2008 financial crisis, the number of improvement projects which were not carried out increased. As of 2018, 393 improvement zones in Seoul have been canceled. Many were relatively good residential areas and had no management plans after the cancellation of the improvement zone. When considering the time from the designation of the improvement zone to its cancellation, regional changes must be observed over an extended period to establish management plans. Hence, this study aims to describe the regional differences in relatively good residential areas from the time of designation of the improvement zone to their cancellation. Doing so, it explores the management directions in these areas. (Method) A relatively good residential area, with detached houses formed by a land readjustment project designated as the improvement zone in New Town, but then canceled, is selected as the study site. The study's chosen site is Seoul's Jungwha Urban Renewal acceleration second district. From the designation of the improvement zone to its cancellation, changes in buildings, population, and households at the study site are compared with adjacent areas. (Results) Before the revocation of the improvement zone, the number of people and households have decreased rapidly, with restrictions on building activities. The number of single-person households and older adults has increased, but the number of households with children has declined rapidly. After the cancellation of the improvement zone, as restrictions on construction activities have been released, the population and households have increased again owing to intensive house construction in a short period. However, the number of households with children moving out is limited. (Conclusions) Although there are limitations to a single case study, the conclusions of this study are as follows. In residential areas with detached houses based on a land readjustment project, the designation of the improvement zone reduces the diversity of populations and households while quickly changing the residential area into a zone for elderly and single-person households. After the cancellation of the improvement zone, the population and number of households have been restored through housing construction, but the diversity of the previous populations and households has not recovered. As a result, the zone will be reconverted into residential areas of single-person households, similar to adjacent areas. Considering these changes, discussions about the populations and households in these areas must precede the establishment of management plans.
    번역하기

    (Background and Purpose) Since 2002, the number of improvement zones for housing redevelopment projects has increased due to the New Town Project. As the real estate market fell after the 2008 financial crisis, the number of improvement projects which...

    (Background and Purpose) Since 2002, the number of improvement zones for housing redevelopment projects has increased due to the New Town Project. As the real estate market fell after the 2008 financial crisis, the number of improvement projects which were not carried out increased. As of 2018, 393 improvement zones in Seoul have been canceled. Many were relatively good residential areas and had no management plans after the cancellation of the improvement zone. When considering the time from the designation of the improvement zone to its cancellation, regional changes must be observed over an extended period to establish management plans. Hence, this study aims to describe the regional differences in relatively good residential areas from the time of designation of the improvement zone to their cancellation. Doing so, it explores the management directions in these areas. (Method) A relatively good residential area, with detached houses formed by a land readjustment project designated as the improvement zone in New Town, but then canceled, is selected as the study site. The study's chosen site is Seoul's Jungwha Urban Renewal acceleration second district. From the designation of the improvement zone to its cancellation, changes in buildings, population, and households at the study site are compared with adjacent areas. (Results) Before the revocation of the improvement zone, the number of people and households have decreased rapidly, with restrictions on building activities. The number of single-person households and older adults has increased, but the number of households with children has declined rapidly. After the cancellation of the improvement zone, as restrictions on construction activities have been released, the population and households have increased again owing to intensive house construction in a short period. However, the number of households with children moving out is limited. (Conclusions) Although there are limitations to a single case study, the conclusions of this study are as follows. In residential areas with detached houses based on a land readjustment project, the designation of the improvement zone reduces the diversity of populations and households while quickly changing the residential area into a zone for elderly and single-person households. After the cancellation of the improvement zone, the population and number of households have been restored through housing construction, but the diversity of the previous populations and households has not recovered. As a result, the zone will be reconverted into residential areas of single-person households, similar to adjacent areas. Considering these changes, discussions about the populations and households in these areas must precede the establishment of management plans.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 크레스웰, "질적 연구방법론" 학지사 2016

    2 서울 중화동향토사연구회, "중화뉴타운으로 인해 잃어버린 12년" 서울 중화동향토사연구회 2017

    3 현수현 ; 이승주, "주택재개발사업의 추진 및 해제 의사결정에 영향을 미치는 특성에 대한 전문가와 주민의 차이 분석" 한국도시행정학회 27 (27): 143-165, 2014

    4 신중진 ; 김태엽 ; 임희지, "저층밀집주택지 환경개선사업의 소규모 공동주택 도입방안 연구" 대한건축학회 22 (22): 187-194, 2006

    5 배웅규 ; 김원, "재정비촉진지구 존치지역 및 해제구역의 기반시설 확충을 위한 연계개발 개념설정 연구" 서울연구원 16 (16): 41-63, 2015

    6 이도길, "재정비사업 해제구역 의사결정 특성 연구 - 의사결정나무기법 중심으로 -" 한국지역학회 37 (37): 49-59, 2021

    7 권혁삼 ; 이영환 ; 박준영 ; 김성훈, "소규모 근린재생을 위한 가로주택정비사업 주거모델 개발" 한국도시설계학회 14 (14): 35-48, 2013

    8 이도길 ; 윤병훈 ; 김사인, "서울시 주택재개발ㆍ주택재건축사업 추진 지역과 해제 지역의 특성 분석" SH공사 도시연구원 7 (7): 1-19, 2017

    9 송영선 ; 김지연 ; 이창무, "서울시 정비사업 수익률 분석을 통한 해제지역의 사업 재추진 가능성 연구" 한국주택학회 30 (30): 57-83, 2022

    10 전주혜 ; 김지엽, "서울시 소규모 주택정비사업의 개발특성에 관한 연구" 대한건축학회 39 (39): 181-192, 2023

    1 크레스웰, "질적 연구방법론" 학지사 2016

    2 서울 중화동향토사연구회, "중화뉴타운으로 인해 잃어버린 12년" 서울 중화동향토사연구회 2017

    3 현수현 ; 이승주, "주택재개발사업의 추진 및 해제 의사결정에 영향을 미치는 특성에 대한 전문가와 주민의 차이 분석" 한국도시행정학회 27 (27): 143-165, 2014

    4 신중진 ; 김태엽 ; 임희지, "저층밀집주택지 환경개선사업의 소규모 공동주택 도입방안 연구" 대한건축학회 22 (22): 187-194, 2006

    5 배웅규 ; 김원, "재정비촉진지구 존치지역 및 해제구역의 기반시설 확충을 위한 연계개발 개념설정 연구" 서울연구원 16 (16): 41-63, 2015

    6 이도길, "재정비사업 해제구역 의사결정 특성 연구 - 의사결정나무기법 중심으로 -" 한국지역학회 37 (37): 49-59, 2021

    7 권혁삼 ; 이영환 ; 박준영 ; 김성훈, "소규모 근린재생을 위한 가로주택정비사업 주거모델 개발" 한국도시설계학회 14 (14): 35-48, 2013

    8 이도길 ; 윤병훈 ; 김사인, "서울시 주택재개발ㆍ주택재건축사업 추진 지역과 해제 지역의 특성 분석" SH공사 도시연구원 7 (7): 1-19, 2017

    9 송영선 ; 김지연 ; 이창무, "서울시 정비사업 수익률 분석을 통한 해제지역의 사업 재추진 가능성 연구" 한국주택학회 30 (30): 57-83, 2022

    10 전주혜 ; 김지엽, "서울시 소규모 주택정비사업의 개발특성에 관한 연구" 대한건축학회 39 (39): 181-192, 2023

    11 노성호, "사회과학 연구방법론" 박영사 2020

    12 배웅규, "도시 및 주거환경정비법 개정에 따른 새로운 정비사업 등의 도입과 과제" 도시정보 2012

    13 고세범 ; 안건혁, "단독주택지내 아파트 건설에 따른 주거블록의 변화 - 서울시 토지구획정리사업으로 조성된 단독주택지를 중심으로" 한국도시설계학회 13 (13): 5-20, 2012

    14 이소영, "교육성과에 대한 네이버후드 효과 연구에서의 공간단위 적절성 문제: MAUP을 고려한 작동스케일 탐색" 대한지리학회 55 (55): 601-618, 2020

    15 김감영, "공간 상호작용 모델에 대한 공간단위 수정가능성 문제(MAUP)의 영향" 대한지리학회 46 (46): 197-211, 2011

    16 이희연, "고급통계분석론" 법문사 2012

    17 Glaeser, E., "Urban growth and housing supply" 6 : 71-89, 2006

    18 Yoon, Insook, "The limits of new-town development project as a means of regional balanced development in Seoul" 20 (20): 35-49, 2004

    19 Mayer, C., "Residential construction" 48 : 85-109, 2000

    20 Shin, Sangyoung, "Managing the safety of newtown-redevelopment cancelled areas in Seoul" The Seoul Institute 2020

    21 Jang, Namjong, "Analysis of condition surveys on newtown and redevelopment project-cancelled areas in Seoul" The Seoul Institute 2014

    22 Jang, Namjong, "An analysis condition surveys and housing regeneration direction newtown and redevelopment project-cancelled areas" The Seoul Institute 2018

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼