한국에서의 오염매체별 환경관리의 법적 문제점 = Legal Problems of Media-Specific environment Management in Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

So far, considerable policies for environment management of Korea have implemented by the government leadership. However, industrial environmental managers argue that self-control environmental management could be possible considering current level of environmental and social ethics. The environment friendly business system is a convincing example for the possibility of an autonomic environmental control. To be active in responding to rapid technological changes, production methods changes, and social changes as well as to be supportive regulation system for improving industries` competitiveness, it is important to shade new light on the fact that the regulatory system should consider industrial view points. Also, coordinating systems between authorities and industries or among industries are the most important aspect in securing institutional flexibility for pollution permit system. Providing continuous administrative experts is necessary to carry out the coordinating systems by improving expertise of the competent authorities and implementing teamwork system by integrating administrative offices. Building trusts and cooperative relationships between environmental agencies, proxies of caring out environment management as well as cooperation between industries and competent authorities are needed. Appropriate institutional backup is mandatory in setting up such cooperative system. Current regulatory system is media-specific control, and average numbers of pollution media are about three or four for one company to consider. Further, it is practically impossible for a company to response flexibly to regulatory provisions considering present facts such as customs of administrative authorities, procedures of transferring work loads between central and regional governments, and inflexible operation of provisions. Also, the costs are high for permit procedures and resulting production setbacks as well as investment of preventive installations. Therefore, it is important to reform the media specific environmental regulation to integrated regulation. Integrated regulation has advantages that are more appropriate to the practical substance of environment, drive more flexibility and consistency by minimize regulations, reduce regulatory burden, and is possible to use media effectively. To reflect the aspects in building regulatory flexibility and cooperative systems and autonomous environment management, transition of current media specific emission controls to integrated environmental control is required. Under the tradition of the scales of production which the production procedures and items are simple, strict permit regulation for new installations and modifications was required. However, today`s product life cycles has been shorten, thus flexible production system is required. Under the current industrial environment, the complex, discrete and inflexible regulation systems that reduce speed of productions is not desirable. Environment law which constituted 6 Article has been implemented in 1990 and amended in accordance with the social changes. They have been specialized and divided in to several relevant regulations. Current environmental regulations are media specific such as air, water, and wastes. Further, each media specific regulations are divided into each emission source. Damages form cross regional air pollution, harmful industrial waste disposal, in-door air pollution, ground water shortages, underground water damages, over use of insecticides and pesticides, disappearing natural regions and wild lives, soil erosion, wetlands loss, and depreciation of natural esthetic beauty are the remained unsolved. However, it should be considered to integrate pollution regulations to respond to social demand. It will be not easy way to implement integrated pollution prevention system and there are lots of practical obstacles remained. Limited budget, determine policy goals and procedural barriers, absence of integration and cooperatio

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "환경입법의 개선방향 환경법연구 제10권" 한국환경법학회 1988

2 "환경법의 이해" 성균관대학교 비교법연구소 1999

3 "환경문제와 국가정책 공간과 사회 제3호" 1993

4 "한국형사정책연구원 현행환경범죄처벌법규의 문제점과 대책" 1993

5 "통합적 환경관리체계 구축을 위한 정책방안 연구" 한국환경정책평가연구원 Ⅰ : 2006

6 "우리나라 환경법체계 정비에 관한 연구" 한국환경정책평가연구원 Ⅰ : 1997

7 "World Commission on Environment and Development The State of Environment" Oxford University Press 1987

8 "The Quest for Environmental Regulatory Integration in the European Union" The Netherlands 2006

9 "State of the Environment A View Toward the Nineties-A Reporter from the Conservation Foundation" 1987

10 "Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development The State of the Environment" OECD 1985

11 "National Academy of Public Administration Step Toward a Stable Future National Academy of Public Administration" 1984

12 "Ministry of Housing Central Department for Information and International Relations Environment Program of the Netherlands 1986-1990" 1985

13 "Message of the President Relative to Reorganization Plans nos 3 and 4 of 1970 in President’s council on Environmental Quality The First Annual Report of the Council on Environmental Quality" 19701970

14 "Integrated Pollution Control in Europe and North America" 1990

15 "Integrated Pollution Control in Europe and North America" 1990

16 "Implementation of Uniform Standards and" 1985

17 "Department of the Environment" 1988

18 "Controlling Pollution for Permanant Protection Toward a Whole Systems Approach to Environmental Policy speech to Natural Resources Council of America" 1985