RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Cardinality Noun Phrases, Wh-Questions, and Scope Ambiguity

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19563947

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper deals with the scope properties of cardinality wh-phrases and proposes a decomposition analysis that treats these phrases as involving both a cardinality wh-operator and an existential group quantifier. This approach is motivated by examples involving cardinality noun phrases in which the cardinality quantifier and the existential group quantifier take separate scope. The decomposition analysis provides a precise and natural account of scope ambiguity in How many questions, which has not been explained in literature. We also examine constituent questions with quantificational noun phrases, and show that they may take scope over each other. Considering a wide range of examples, we argue against the view that the relative scope order between an interrogative operator and a universal quantifier exhibits subject-object asymmetry and is subject to a syntactic constraint.
    번역하기

    This paper deals with the scope properties of cardinality wh-phrases and proposes a decomposition analysis that treats these phrases as involving both a cardinality wh-operator and an existential group quantifier. This approach is motivated by example...

    This paper deals with the scope properties of cardinality wh-phrases and proposes a decomposition analysis that treats these phrases as involving both a cardinality wh-operator and an existential group quantifier. This approach is motivated by examples involving cardinality noun phrases in which the cardinality quantifier and the existential group quantifier take separate scope. The decomposition analysis provides a precise and natural account of scope ambiguity in How many questions, which has not been explained in literature. We also examine constituent questions with quantificational noun phrases, and show that they may take scope over each other. Considering a wide range of examples, we argue against the view that the relative scope order between an interrogative operator and a universal quantifier exhibits subject-object asymmetry and is subject to a syntactic constraint.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Scope Ambiguity of Amount Phrases
    • 3. Analysis
    • 4. More on Wh/Quantifier Scope Interaction
    • 5. Conclusion
    • 1. Introduction
    • 2. Scope Ambiguity of Amount Phrases
    • 3. Analysis
    • 4. More on Wh/Quantifier Scope Interaction
    • 5. Conclusion
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼