RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    기여적 증세로의 전환에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Transition into the Contributive Tax Increase

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108919592

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study investigates whether the pincette taxation complies to the various justice concepts, and provides the contributive taxation as its alternative. The study employs a literature review approach, examining our tax rate structure, and verifies the valifities of the pincette taxation based on the literature and study of the justice concept of prominent philosophers including Bentham, Kant, Rawls, Sandel.
    Pincette taxation which imposes most of tax burden to the small number of taxpayer in the society isnot compliant to the justice concepts of Rule Utilitarianism, Kant’s deontological ethics, Rawls’ social cooperation, and Sandel’s contributive justice in that it excludes most of social participants from its burden. It is only partly justified by the Act Utilitarianism and Socialism. To be more universally just taxation, its system has to be transitted to the contributive taxation which put its obligations to most of members in the society.
    Pincette taxation may comply to the vertical equity concept;however, it is not compatible with various views of justice. To be compliant with the justive concept, tax increase has to include the burden from the most of society members, thereby in accordance with contributive justice.
    번역하기

    This study investigates whether the pincette taxation complies to the various justice concepts, and provides the contributive taxation as its alternative. The study employs a literature review approach, examining our tax rate structure, and verifies t...

    This study investigates whether the pincette taxation complies to the various justice concepts, and provides the contributive taxation as its alternative. The study employs a literature review approach, examining our tax rate structure, and verifies the valifities of the pincette taxation based on the literature and study of the justice concept of prominent philosophers including Bentham, Kant, Rawls, Sandel.
    Pincette taxation which imposes most of tax burden to the small number of taxpayer in the society isnot compliant to the justice concepts of Rule Utilitarianism, Kant’s deontological ethics, Rawls’ social cooperation, and Sandel’s contributive justice in that it excludes most of social participants from its burden. It is only partly justified by the Act Utilitarianism and Socialism. To be more universally just taxation, its system has to be transitted to the contributive taxation which put its obligations to most of members in the society.
    Pincette taxation may comply to the vertical equity concept;however, it is not compatible with various views of justice. To be compliant with the justive concept, tax increase has to include the burden from the most of society members, thereby in accordance with contributive justice.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 방승주, "헌법과 조세정의" 한국헌법학회 15 (15): 1-41, 2009

    2 Joan Williams, "초예측" 웅진 지식하우스 192-, 2019

    3 홍순만, "조세와 재정의 미래:지속가능한 복지를 위한 증세방향" 문우사 118-198, 2021

    4 M.Sandel, "정의란 무엇인가" 김영사 364-, 2010

    5 박지현, "재산세․종합부동산세의 역할 정립을 위한 보유세제 재설계 방향" 한국지방세연구원 73-123, 2021

    6 유호림, "우리나라의 조세정의(租稅正義)에 관한 고찰" 한국조세연구포럼 19 (19): 267-296, 2019

    7 김빛마로, "우리나라 법인세율 체계 개편 필요성 검토 : 해외 주요국 정책동향을 중심으로" 4 : 2022

    8 William James, "실용주의" 아카넷 119-125, 2018

    9 전태영, "세금 이야기"

    10 이태수, "선(先)조세정의, 후(後)보편증세라는 단계적 전략이 필요하다" 9-13, 2015

    1 방승주, "헌법과 조세정의" 한국헌법학회 15 (15): 1-41, 2009

    2 Joan Williams, "초예측" 웅진 지식하우스 192-, 2019

    3 홍순만, "조세와 재정의 미래:지속가능한 복지를 위한 증세방향" 문우사 118-198, 2021

    4 M.Sandel, "정의란 무엇인가" 김영사 364-, 2010

    5 박지현, "재산세․종합부동산세의 역할 정립을 위한 보유세제 재설계 방향" 한국지방세연구원 73-123, 2021

    6 유호림, "우리나라의 조세정의(租稅正義)에 관한 고찰" 한국조세연구포럼 19 (19): 267-296, 2019

    7 김빛마로, "우리나라 법인세율 체계 개편 필요성 검토 : 해외 주요국 정책동향을 중심으로" 4 : 2022

    8 William James, "실용주의" 아카넷 119-125, 2018

    9 전태영, "세금 이야기"

    10 이태수, "선(先)조세정의, 후(後)보편증세라는 단계적 전략이 필요하다" 9-13, 2015

    11 B. Russell, "서양철학사" 집문당 375-391, 2010

    12 고준예, "배분적 정의와 세법상 응능부담원칙" 법과정책연구원 12 (12): 1-28, 2020

    13 J. Haidt, "바른 마음" 웅진지식하우스 248-254, 2015

    14 장동익, "로버트 노직, 무정부 국가 유토피아" 컴뮤니케이션북스 47-65, 2017

    15 J. Rachels, "도덕철학의 기초" 나눔의 집 195-, 2020

    16 J. Rawls, "도덕철학사 강의" 이학사 501-, 2020

    17 J. Bentham, "도덕과 입법의 원리서설" 나남 28-36, 2018

    18 유영성, "기본소득형 국토보유세 도입과 세제개편에 관한 연구" 경기연구원 54-55, 2020

    19 I. Kant, "굿윌:도덕 형이상학의 기초" 이소노미아 133-137, 2018

    20 이범웅, "공동체주의의 시민성의 성격과 시민성 함양에 대한 연구" 한국초등도덕교육학회 (70) : 219-249, 2020

    21 Sandel. M. J., "공동체주의와 공공성" 철학과 현실사 259-289, 2008

    22 이당영, "租稅正義 具現을 위한 租稅政策 方向에 관한 硏究" 가천대학교 대학원 2014

    23 MAURO CARDOSO SIMÕES, "rule utilitarianism" 8 (8): 49-, 2009

    24 Hidehiko Takahashi, "When Your Gain Is My Pain and Your Pain Is My Gain:Neural Correlates of Envy and Schadenfreude" 323 : 937-938, 2009

    25 Peter Vallentyne, "University of Missouri Taxation:Philosophical Perspectives" Oxford University Press 98-110, 2018

    26 M. Sandel, "The Tyranny of Merit" Penguin 212-, 2021

    27 Richard A. Westin, "The Historical Origins of Progressive Taxation" 23 (23): 203-, 2014

    28 Sagit Leviner, "THE NORMATIVE UNDERPINNINGS OF TAXATION" 13 : 111-112, 2012

    29 D. Bell, "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" 1-, 2020

    30 R. Dworkin, "Sovereign Virtue:The Theory and Practice of Equality" Harvard University Press 97-, 2000

    31 D. Duff, "Philosophical Foundation of Tax Law" Oxford University Press 176-185, 2017

    32 B. Watson, "Liberal Communitarianism as Political Theory" 28 (28): 211-, 2010

    33 Peter Vallentyne, "Left Libertarianism and Its Critics:The Contemporary Debate" Palgrave Publishers Ltd 1-20, 2000

    34 Sangwand, T-Kay, "KULA:Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies" University of Victoria Libraries

    35 Hospers, "Justice:Alternative Political Perspectives" Wadsworth Publishing Company 24-34, 1974

    36 J. Rawls, "Justice as Fairness: A Restatement" Harvard University Press 179-, 2001

    37 Smith, "Exploring the when and why of Schadenfreude" 3 (3): 530-546, 2009

    38 Joel B. Slemrod, "DOES ATLAS SHRUG? THE ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF TAXING THE RICH" 3-, 2000

    39 Robert Nozick, "Anarchy, State, and Utopia"

    40 R. Brandt, "A Theory of the Right and the Good" Clarendon Press 194-, 1979

    41 Michigan Law Review, "A Theory of the Good and the Right" 79 : 830-, 1981

    42 T. Piketty, "21세기 자본" 글항아리 703-, 2014

    43 기획재정부, "2022 조세특례 심층평가(2) 중소기업에 대한 특별세액감면" 71-76, 2022

    44 J. Peterson, "12가지 인생법칙" 메이븐 278-385, 2018

    45 C.Darwin, "(photo reproduction of 1871 edition), The descent of man and selection in relation to sex"

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼