RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Didaktik의 교육과정적 함의 = Implications of Didaktik for curriculum and teaching

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100032668

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This research aims to introduce the unfamiliar notion of Didaktik, and to clarify insights about the curriculum studies. Didaktik has to be understood in terms of the educational theory that includes all aspects of the teaching-learning process. According to Klafki, a teacher considers five questions, in terms of didactic analysis. First, what is the more general or fundamental meaning that the content exemplifies and opens up to students? Second, what kinds of meaning do these contents provide for students who are learning right now? Third, what constitutes the topic`s significance for the students` futures? Fourth, how can these contents be structured? Fifth, can these contents contribute to the internalization of students, as a vital human possession? These considerations implies much with regard to our curriculum studies. The explanation and verification of the content, which we have long neglected in our curriculum theory, are obviously included in Didaktik. According to Didaktik, in order to perform teaching properly, much analysis and consideration of various meaning-layers of the content are required. This is particularly true for the discussion of the content of each subjectmatter, and a general yet inclusive discussion about the content must be recommended on behalf of the curriculum theory.
      번역하기

      This research aims to introduce the unfamiliar notion of Didaktik, and to clarify insights about the curriculum studies. Didaktik has to be understood in terms of the educational theory that includes all aspects of the teaching-learning process. Accor...

      This research aims to introduce the unfamiliar notion of Didaktik, and to clarify insights about the curriculum studies. Didaktik has to be understood in terms of the educational theory that includes all aspects of the teaching-learning process. According to Klafki, a teacher considers five questions, in terms of didactic analysis. First, what is the more general or fundamental meaning that the content exemplifies and opens up to students? Second, what kinds of meaning do these contents provide for students who are learning right now? Third, what constitutes the topic`s significance for the students` futures? Fourth, how can these contents be structured? Fifth, can these contents contribute to the internalization of students, as a vital human possession? These considerations implies much with regard to our curriculum studies. The explanation and verification of the content, which we have long neglected in our curriculum theory, are obviously included in Didaktik. According to Didaktik, in order to perform teaching properly, much analysis and consideration of various meaning-layers of the content are required. This is particularly true for the discussion of the content of each subjectmatter, and a general yet inclusive discussion about the content must be recommended on behalf of the curriculum theory.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Herbart, J. F., "일반교육학" 연세대학교출판부 1988

      2 김창환, "독일 교수학(Didaktik)의 역사" 한독교육학회 1-24, 2007

      3 Comenius, J. A., "대교수학" 교육과학사 1987

      4 김영래, "교육적 수업이론으로서의 일반교수학" 한독교육학회 25-38, 2007

      5 Kansanen, P., "The deutche diadaktik" 27 (27): 347-352, 1995

      6 Gudmundsdottir, S., "Teaching as a reflective practice: The German didaktik tradition" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers 319-334, 2000

      7 Hopmann, S., "Starting a dialogue: Issues in a beginning conversation between Didaktik and the curriculum tradition" 27 (27): 3-12, 1995

      8 Uljens, M., "School didactics and learning" Psychology Press 1997

      9 Hudson, B., "Holding complexity and searching for meaning: Teaching as reflective practice" 34 (34): 43-57, 2002

      10 Menck, P., "Diadactic as construction of content" 27 (27): 353-371, 1995

      1 Herbart, J. F., "일반교육학" 연세대학교출판부 1988

      2 김창환, "독일 교수학(Didaktik)의 역사" 한독교육학회 1-24, 2007

      3 Comenius, J. A., "대교수학" 교육과학사 1987

      4 김영래, "교육적 수업이론으로서의 일반교수학" 한독교육학회 25-38, 2007

      5 Kansanen, P., "The deutche diadaktik" 27 (27): 347-352, 1995

      6 Gudmundsdottir, S., "Teaching as a reflective practice: The German didaktik tradition" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers 319-334, 2000

      7 Hopmann, S., "Starting a dialogue: Issues in a beginning conversation between Didaktik and the curriculum tradition" 27 (27): 3-12, 1995

      8 Uljens, M., "School didactics and learning" Psychology Press 1997

      9 Hudson, B., "Holding complexity and searching for meaning: Teaching as reflective practice" 34 (34): 43-57, 2002

      10 Menck, P., "Diadactic as construction of content" 27 (27): 353-371, 1995

      11 Klafki, W., "Diadactic analysis as the core of preparation of instruction" 27 (27): 13-30, 1995

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Curriculum Studies KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.81 2.81 2.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.65 2.69 3.561 0.48
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼