RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Rising Extreme Poverty: Social Exclusion of Welfare Families in Georgia, U.S.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103540461

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    One of the most widely debated issues in welfare reform has been whether welfare families achieve economic well being via employment. Although this question has greatly advanced our understanding of welfare recipients, it has neglected the aspect of poverty that comes from diverse exclusive social relationships. This study raises the question of social exclusion in the prediction of poverty, and applies three dimensions to answer this question: labor market, informal networks, and welfare support system. Using the data from Georgia Welfare Reform Research, we found that extreme poverty rates among former welfare families increased steadily after 1999, leading to one out of four families having nodisposable income. The results show that high levels of extreme poverty are concentrated among families with a nonworking single parent, disabled child or parent, those families who are members of a distrust group and those who do not attend church. The most powerful policy effect came from SSL, whereas other public assistance programs were not effective at preventingextreme poverty. Our findings suggest that poverty can be approached through a process of social integration that establishes partnerships with local nonprofits, neighborhood initiatives, and public programs. Establishing supportive environments for the extremely poor is the key to reducing poverty and facilitating the transition from welfare to work.
    번역하기

    One of the most widely debated issues in welfare reform has been whether welfare families achieve economic well being via employment. Although this question has greatly advanced our understanding of welfare recipients, it has neglected the aspect of p...

    One of the most widely debated issues in welfare reform has been whether welfare families achieve economic well being via employment. Although this question has greatly advanced our understanding of welfare recipients, it has neglected the aspect of poverty that comes from diverse exclusive social relationships. This study raises the question of social exclusion in the prediction of poverty, and applies three dimensions to answer this question: labor market, informal networks, and welfare support system. Using the data from Georgia Welfare Reform Research, we found that extreme poverty rates among former welfare families increased steadily after 1999, leading to one out of four families having nodisposable income. The results show that high levels of extreme poverty are concentrated among families with a nonworking single parent, disabled child or parent, those families who are members of a distrust group and those who do not attend church. The most powerful policy effect came from SSL, whereas other public assistance programs were not effective at preventingextreme poverty. Our findings suggest that poverty can be approached through a process of social integration that establishes partnerships with local nonprofits, neighborhood initiatives, and public programs. Establishing supportive environments for the extremely poor is the key to reducing poverty and facilitating the transition from welfare to work.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Purpose
    • III. Welfare Reform : Winners and Losers
    • IV. Georgia Welfare Reform Studies
    • Abstract
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Purpose
    • III. Welfare Reform : Winners and Losers
    • IV. Georgia Welfare Reform Studies
    • V. Methods
    • VI. Results
    • VII. Discussion
    • References
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼