산업재해보상보험법상 구상권의 본질과 제3자로서의 공무원 -대법원 2003. 12. 26. 선고 2003다13307 판결을 중심으로- = The essence of subrogating right and a public officer as the third party in the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act is enacted to ensure the welfare of the employees and their families who were injured because of his work. Unlike other social insurance systems, the employer pay the entire insurance premium. This is a representation of the damage function in the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act In case an employee is injured by a third party in the process of working, Korea Labor Welfare Corporation pays the worker for industrial insurance benefits and subrogates the right of the worker to file a damage claim against the third party within the limits of the benefit amount based on the article 87 of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act.
Thought the article 87 of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act is stipulated in the name of the right to demand a reimbursement, the essence of the article 87 is the subrogating right. the coverage of the third party as the requisite for claim for reimbursement should be studied for the exercise of the right to demand a reimbursement.
The Supreme Court hold that a civil servant is not included in this coverage of the third party in the subrogating right but local government is included in that.
It is studied that the verdict of the Supreme Court is wrong because local government is not included and civil servant is included in that.
The ground of theory is that the verdict conflict with the principle of liability insurance as the legal nature of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 최성경, "채무이행에 사용되는 제3자의 분류와 채무자책임감경" 한국민사법학회 (27) : 87-132, 2005

2 문원주, "실무 산업재해보상보험법" 법원사 1994

3 김영문, "산업재해보상보험법상의 구상권" 한국노동법학회 (10) : 2000

4 유충권, "산업재해보상보험법상 보험자대위와 제3자의 범위" 비교법학연구소 24 : 73-92, 2007

5 한경식, "사회보험법상 보험자의 구상권" 한국비교노동법학회 16 : 153-176, 2009

6 한삼인, "사용자책임의 본질과 그 면책의 법적 의미" 법학연구소 22 (22): 181-216, 2011

7 장석천, "사용자책임에 있어서 구상권 제한의 법리" 한양법학회 23 (23): 433-453, 2012

8 김효신, "보험법의 법리" 경북대학교출판부 2005

9 김효신, "보증보험에서 보험자의 대위권과 구상권" 경북대학교 법학연구원 18 : 2002

10 이영준, "민법총칙" 박영사 2007

11 강태성, "민법총칙" 대왕출판사 2003

12 김형배, "민법강의" 박영사 2006

13 박지순, "동료근로자의 가해행위로 인한 업무상 재해와 산업재해보상보험법상의 구상권" 한국노동법학회 (22) : 365-350, 2006

14 정하중, "국가배상법의 문제점과 개선방향" 서강대학교 법학연구소 9 : 2007

15 서봉석, "구상권과 3자관계의 권리조정" 한국민사법학회 (42) : 459-492, 2008

16 정남철, "國家賠償訴訟과 先決問題 -특히 構成要件的 效力, 旣判力 그리고 違法槪念을 중심으로-" 한국법학원 (116) : 102-132, 2010

17 송희성, "國家賠償法上 몇 가지 問題點" 한국비교공법학회 4 (4): 209-223, 2002