RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한일협력과 역사문제-갈등을 넘어 화해로 = Korea and Japan`s Reconciliation over the Historical Conflict with Bilateral Cooperation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101968523

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    South Korea and Japan were not able to reach a willingly agreeable solution to their historical problems that stem from experiences during Japanese colonial rule. Nonetheless, the two countries put an effort into the relief of Korean victims and succeeded in some parts. At the time of normalization of Japan-South Korea diplomatic relations in 1965, Japan lacked in apologizing and reflective historical awareness regarding the Japanese invasion and occupation of Korea. However, starting from the 90s Japan demonstrated remarkable progress in enhancing historical awareness. Japan clarified its position of apologies and regrets for the past invasions and occupations, and provided diverse aids in the name of humanitarian purposes to Korean victims, such as Korean atomic bomb survivals, Sakhalin Koreans, and “comfort women.“ Such changes in attitude results from persistent demands of victims and activists who support them, but efforts of two governments to introduce their demands as a diplomatic agenda and to solve it through negotiations should be considered into account. Moreover, researchers, teachers, and journalists also played their roles throughout the process by identifying the essence of historical problems and leading public opinions toward the solution of problems. Thus, the half-century process of incorporating and solving historical problems as a diplomatic agenda between Korea and Japan could be understood along with the general developmental track of Korea-Japan relations. South Korea and Japan are neighbors that should expand their national interests through both competition and cooperation. They are destined to such position regardless of remaining hatred or hostility. So it is desirable for the two countries to overcome historical conflicts and accomplish a reconciliation. However, the pathway toward the historial reconciliation is challenging and requires mutual reflection and concession. Nevertheless, it is a possible future with the commitment of two countries. There is almost no precedent of historical reconciliation between an imperial aggressor state and a former colonial state. Therefore, the accomplishment of historical reconciliation through mutual efforts between Korea and Japan will present a new vision to the history of humankind as a significant achievement. Hence, it is necessary for the two countries to believe in historical reconciliation rather than conflict by developing and executing joint projects. For instance, the establishment of Korea-Japan’s Future Foundation or Korea-Japan’s Friendship and Trust Foundation for a comprehensive approach to historical problems and for a business toward the improvement of historical awareness could be one of possible methods. At the end, Korea and Japan will encounter a reality in which the future already arranged the past and will discover themselves with higher dignities as those who led the world into a new horizon of civilization.
    번역하기

    South Korea and Japan were not able to reach a willingly agreeable solution to their historical problems that stem from experiences during Japanese colonial rule. Nonetheless, the two countries put an effort into the relief of Korean victims and succe...

    South Korea and Japan were not able to reach a willingly agreeable solution to their historical problems that stem from experiences during Japanese colonial rule. Nonetheless, the two countries put an effort into the relief of Korean victims and succeeded in some parts. At the time of normalization of Japan-South Korea diplomatic relations in 1965, Japan lacked in apologizing and reflective historical awareness regarding the Japanese invasion and occupation of Korea. However, starting from the 90s Japan demonstrated remarkable progress in enhancing historical awareness. Japan clarified its position of apologies and regrets for the past invasions and occupations, and provided diverse aids in the name of humanitarian purposes to Korean victims, such as Korean atomic bomb survivals, Sakhalin Koreans, and “comfort women.“ Such changes in attitude results from persistent demands of victims and activists who support them, but efforts of two governments to introduce their demands as a diplomatic agenda and to solve it through negotiations should be considered into account. Moreover, researchers, teachers, and journalists also played their roles throughout the process by identifying the essence of historical problems and leading public opinions toward the solution of problems. Thus, the half-century process of incorporating and solving historical problems as a diplomatic agenda between Korea and Japan could be understood along with the general developmental track of Korea-Japan relations. South Korea and Japan are neighbors that should expand their national interests through both competition and cooperation. They are destined to such position regardless of remaining hatred or hostility. So it is desirable for the two countries to overcome historical conflicts and accomplish a reconciliation. However, the pathway toward the historial reconciliation is challenging and requires mutual reflection and concession. Nevertheless, it is a possible future with the commitment of two countries. There is almost no precedent of historical reconciliation between an imperial aggressor state and a former colonial state. Therefore, the accomplishment of historical reconciliation through mutual efforts between Korea and Japan will present a new vision to the history of humankind as a significant achievement. Hence, it is necessary for the two countries to believe in historical reconciliation rather than conflict by developing and executing joint projects. For instance, the establishment of Korea-Japan’s Future Foundation or Korea-Japan’s Friendship and Trust Foundation for a comprehensive approach to historical problems and for a business toward the improvement of historical awareness could be one of possible methods. At the end, Korea and Japan will encounter a reality in which the future already arranged the past and will discover themselves with higher dignities as those who led the world into a new horizon of civilization.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정재정, "歷史에서 본 韓日關係와 文明轉換" 역사교육연구회 (128) : 299-337, 2013

    2 정재정, "한일회담 · 한일협정, 그 후의 한일관계" 동북아역사재단 2015

    3 정재정, "한일의 역사갈등과 역사대화"

    4 정재정, "한일관계의 위기와 극복을 향한 오디세이-영토와 역사를 둘러싼 갈등을 중심으로" 5 : 4-37, 2013

    5 정재정, "한국은 100년전 고래들 속 새우 아니다...돌고래 정도로 성장"

    6 Diamond, Jared, "총.균.쇠" 문학사상사 1998

    7 정재정, "주제와 쟁점으로 읽는 20세기 한일관계사" 역사비평사 2014

    8 정재정, "역사문제 해결할 ‘한일미래재단’ 만들자"

    9 장박진, "미완의 청산-한일회담 청구권 교섭의 세부 과정" 역사공간 2014

    10 유의상, "대일 외교의 명분과 실리-대일 청구권 교섭 과정의 복원" 역사공간 2016

    1 정재정, "歷史에서 본 韓日關係와 文明轉換" 역사교육연구회 (128) : 299-337, 2013

    2 정재정, "한일회담 · 한일협정, 그 후의 한일관계" 동북아역사재단 2015

    3 정재정, "한일의 역사갈등과 역사대화"

    4 정재정, "한일관계의 위기와 극복을 향한 오디세이-영토와 역사를 둘러싼 갈등을 중심으로" 5 : 4-37, 2013

    5 정재정, "한국은 100년전 고래들 속 새우 아니다...돌고래 정도로 성장"

    6 Diamond, Jared, "총.균.쇠" 문학사상사 1998

    7 정재정, "주제와 쟁점으로 읽는 20세기 한일관계사" 역사비평사 2014

    8 정재정, "역사문제 해결할 ‘한일미래재단’ 만들자"

    9 장박진, "미완의 청산-한일회담 청구권 교섭의 세부 과정" 역사공간 2014

    10 유의상, "대일 외교의 명분과 실리-대일 청구권 교섭 과정의 복원" 역사공간 2016

    11 黒澤文貴, "歴史と和解" 東京大学出版会 2011

    12 材村幹, "日韓歷史認識問題とは何か 歴史敎斗書·『慰安帰』·ポピュリズム』に 対して" ミネノレヴァ書房 2014

    13 花房俊雄, "日韓「合意」に思う一「合意」の実施にあたって被害者への直接謝罪を日 本政府に訴える" 岩波書店 882 : 2016

    14 정재정, "日韓 <歷史對立>と<歴史対話>-「歴史認識問通和解の道を考える" 新泉社 2015

    15 和田春樹, "慰安婦問題の解決ために" 平凡社 2015

    16 服部竜二, "外交ドキュメント歴史認識" 岩波書店 2015

    17 임홍빈, "‘한일 쌍둥이론’의 의미"

    18 アクティブ · ミュージアム「女たちの戦争と平和資料館」, "wamだより vol. 32" ア クティブ·ミュージアム「女たちの戦争と平和資料館」(wam)事務局 2016

    19 小倉紀蔵, ""日韓関係の争点". 藤原書店" 藤原書店 2014

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-05-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal for Japanese Studies -> The Korea Journal of Japanese Studies KCI등재
    2019-04-22 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Association For Japanese Studies -> The Korean Association of Contemporary Japanese Studies KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2016-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-05-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 日本硏究論叢 -> 일본연구논총 KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼