RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      확률 기반 설계법을 위한 코드 변환과 시스템 신뢰도에 대한 고찰 = The study on the system reliability and code conversion for the probability based design

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104332733

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Because PBD was started as a design tool for steel construction and concrete construction, it was able to applied to the post and beam method of wooden building constructions. But, it may not suitable to light frame wooden construction that is becoming popular in domestic construction market due to the economical efficiency and the constructive simplification. Owing to the share effects between member and sheathing material or among structural members, light frame wooden construction is different from post and beam construction that use a single structural member. Therefore, consideration on the system analysis and system design are urgently needed to use in actual life and inspect the reliability of structures from the system view.
      With this in mind, code conversion from ASD to PBD that is pressing issue in domestic wooden building construction was studied, also various countries status about PBD were considered and then approaching methods on the system reliability were referred. Finally, several considerations for the development of PBD were explored.
      PBD should be considered as, not only a new structural design process that select sizes of structural member, but a industrial tool that can lead a development of more reliable wood products. A strongest point of PBD is independent of various construction materials and construction types.
      번역하기

      Because PBD was started as a design tool for steel construction and concrete construction, it was able to applied to the post and beam method of wooden building constructions. But, it may not suitable to light frame wooden construction that is becomin...

      Because PBD was started as a design tool for steel construction and concrete construction, it was able to applied to the post and beam method of wooden building constructions. But, it may not suitable to light frame wooden construction that is becoming popular in domestic construction market due to the economical efficiency and the constructive simplification. Owing to the share effects between member and sheathing material or among structural members, light frame wooden construction is different from post and beam construction that use a single structural member. Therefore, consideration on the system analysis and system design are urgently needed to use in actual life and inspect the reliability of structures from the system view.
      With this in mind, code conversion from ASD to PBD that is pressing issue in domestic wooden building construction was studied, also various countries status about PBD were considered and then approaching methods on the system reliability were referred. Finally, several considerations for the development of PBD were explored.
      PBD should be considered as, not only a new structural design process that select sizes of structural member, but a industrial tool that can lead a development of more reliable wood products. A strongest point of PBD is independent of various construction materials and construction types.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Because PBD was started as a design tool for steel construction and concrete construction, it was able to applied to the post and beam method of wooden building constructions. But, it may not suitable to light frame wooden construction that is becoming popular in domestic construction market due to the economical efficiency and the constructive simplification. Owing to the share effects between member and sheathing material or among structural members, light frame wooden construction is different from post and beam construction that use a single structural member. Therefore, consideration on the system analysis and system design are urgently needed to use in actual life and inspect the reliability of structures from the system view.
      With this in mind, code conversion from ASD to PBD that is pressing issue in domestic wooden building construction was studied, also various countries status about PBD were considered and then approaching methods on the system reliability were referred. Finally, several considerations for the development of PBD were explored.
      PBD should be considered as, not only a new structural design process that select sizes of structural member, but a industrial tool that can lead a development of more reliable wood products. A strongest point of PBD is independent of various construction materials and construction types.
      번역하기

      Because PBD was started as a design tool for steel construction and concrete construction, it was able to applied to the post and beam method of wooden building constructions. But, it may not suitable to light frame wooden construction that is becomin...

      Because PBD was started as a design tool for steel construction and concrete construction, it was able to applied to the post and beam method of wooden building constructions. But, it may not suitable to light frame wooden construction that is becoming popular in domestic construction market due to the economical efficiency and the constructive simplification. Owing to the share effects between member and sheathing material or among structural members, light frame wooden construction is different from post and beam construction that use a single structural member. Therefore, consideration on the system analysis and system design are urgently needed to use in actual life and inspect the reliability of structures from the system view.
      With this in mind, code conversion from ASD to PBD that is pressing issue in domestic wooden building construction was studied, also various countries status about PBD were considered and then approaching methods on the system reliability were referred. Finally, several considerations for the development of PBD were explored.
      PBD should be considered as, not only a new structural design process that select sizes of structural member, but a industrial tool that can lead a development of more reliable wood products. A strongest point of PBD is independent of various construction materials and construction types.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 장상식, "뉴질랜드 목조건축 매뉴얼" 2008

      2 Keith F. Faherty, "Wood Engineering and construction handbook" McGraw-Hill, Inc 1989

      3 Borg Madsen, "Structural behavior of timber" Timber Engineering Ltd 1992

      4 Chen Wai-Fah, "Structural Engineering Handbook" CRC Press LLC 1999

      5 David V. Rosowsky, "Reliability-based system factor for serviceability design of wood floors" 28 (28): 356-368, 1996

      6 R.O. Foschi, "Reliability-based design of wood structures. Structural research series, report No. 34. Dept. of civil engineering" University of British Columbia 1989

      7 Bryan Folz., "Reliability-based design of wood structural systems" 115 (115): 1666-1680, 1988

      8 Ricardo O. Foschi, "Reliability of wood structural systems" 110 (110): 2995-3013, 1984

      9 Ricardo O. Foschi, "Reliability based design in timber engineering" 1990

      10 Andrzej S. Nowak, "Reliability Analysis of Plank Decks for Bridges" 225-231, 1996

      1 장상식, "뉴질랜드 목조건축 매뉴얼" 2008

      2 Keith F. Faherty, "Wood Engineering and construction handbook" McGraw-Hill, Inc 1989

      3 Borg Madsen, "Structural behavior of timber" Timber Engineering Ltd 1992

      4 Chen Wai-Fah, "Structural Engineering Handbook" CRC Press LLC 1999

      5 David V. Rosowsky, "Reliability-based system factor for serviceability design of wood floors" 28 (28): 356-368, 1996

      6 R.O. Foschi, "Reliability-based design of wood structures. Structural research series, report No. 34. Dept. of civil engineering" University of British Columbia 1989

      7 Bryan Folz., "Reliability-based design of wood structural systems" 115 (115): 1666-1680, 1988

      8 Ricardo O. Foschi, "Reliability of wood structural systems" 110 (110): 2995-3013, 1984

      9 Ricardo O. Foschi, "Reliability based design in timber engineering" 1990

      10 Andrzej S. Nowak, "Reliability Analysis of Plank Decks for Bridges" 225-231, 1996

      11 Bruce Ellingwood, "Probability based load criteria:Load factors and load combination" 108 : 978-997, 1982

      12 R.H. Leicester, "On developing an Australian limit states code" 12-20, 1990

      13 David S. Gromala, "Load and Resistant Factor Design for Wood: The New U.S. Wood Design Specification" 311-318, 1990

      14 Andrzej S. Nowak, "Load and Resistance Factor Design Code for Wood Bridges" 351-357, 1995

      15 Joseph F.Murphy, "LRFD for engineered wood construction" ASCE 1988

      16 Canadian Wood Council, "Introduction to wood design"

      17 David S., "Implementation of Load and Resistance Factor Design in the United States" 40-47, 1996

      18 Bob Leicester, "Global harmonization of timber engineering codes and standards"

      19 Keith Crews, "Development of Limit States Design Procedures for Timber Bridges" 292-300, 1996

      20 James R. Goodman, "Code comparisons of Factor Design for Wood" 107 : 1511-1527, 1981

      21 "Australian/New Zealand standard. Timber - structural products - strength and stiffness evaluation. part2:Sawn timber. AS/NZS 4063"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.19 0.19 0.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.23 0.22 0.375 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼